Americans might be mad as hell at Congress — but they’re going to keep taking it.
Consider these two facts:
1: Congressional approval is at 11 percent, as measured by the latest Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor Poll.
2: Exactly zero incumbent candidates — for the Senate or House — have lost a primary race in this midterm cycle. In Tuesday’s congressional primaries, incumbents went 45 for 45, and establishment Republicans won easy victories against their tea-party rivals. Despite how much voters say they hate the current Congress, they still like them better than their primary challengers.
Now, these are just primary elections. Come November, the incumbents could lose out to the other party. That’s especially true for Senate Democrats. As Charlie Cook has explained, “A survey of the national landscape finds that open Democratic seats in South Dakota and, to a lesser extent, West Virginia will be extremely difficult for the party to hold.”
So what gives with these primary results?
Incumbent reelection rates are rarely responsive to public opinion of Congress. Even in years when congressional approval tanks, incumbent turnover holds steady.
For one, overall congressional approval numbers don’t extrapolate well. Voters elect solely their own representatives, and their ballots aren’t necessarily a referendum on the entire legislative body. Last May, when congressional approval was at 13 percent, Gallup found about 46 percent approved of the job their representative was doing. This April, the AP asked a similar question, and found that while just 16 percent approved of Congress, 39 percent said they would like to see their member reelected. Of those who are most politically engaged, that figure was 44 percent.
Also, in recent years districts have become “safer” for political parties due to redistricting, as you can see in the sliding graphic to the right.
What’s becoming apparent now is that even the historically low approval of Congress during the government shutdown — Gallup had it as low as 9 percent — can’t shake this incumbent advantage. House reelection rates, in most cycles, are higher than 90 percent, according to OpenSecrets. For the Senate, those numbers are only slightly lower.
The Senate may very well flip to the Republicans, over a handful of seats, but the majority of the faces in the chamber will be the same.
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.
Republican House leaders are planning on taking up a vote to renew the Iran Sanctions Act as soon as the lame-duck session begins in mid-November. The law, which expires on Dec. 31, permits a host of sanctions against Iran's industries, defense, and government. The renewal will likely pass the House, but its status is unclear once it reaches the Senate, and a spokesman from the White House refused to say whether President Obama would sign it into law.