White House Opposes House Missile-Defense Moves

A Patriot Advanced Capability 3 interceptor is launched from Omelek Island during a test in October 2012. The White House this week rejected several missile-defense initiatives proposed by the Republican-controlled House.
National Journal
Sebastian Sprenger
Add to Briefcase
Sebastian Sprenger
May 21, 2014, 10:03 a.m.

Sev­er­al de­fens­ive and of­fens­ive mis­sile-themed pro­vi­sions that ori­gin­ated in the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled House have drawn op­pos­i­tion from the White House.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion de­cried as too risky and too ex­pens­ive a push by law­makers to ac­cel­er­ate the de­ploy­ment to Po­land of a land-based ver­sion of the Ae­gis mis­sile de­fense sys­tem by some­time in 2016, and short-range an­ti­mis­sile cap­ab­il­it­ies by late 2014.

House mis­sile-de­fense ad­voc­ates had in­ser­ted lan­guage to that ef­fect in­to the fisc­al 2015 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill. The le­gis­la­tion is ex­pec­ted to be con­sidered on the House floor this week.

Meant by its sup­port­ers as a coun­ter­weight to Mo­scow’s re­cent moves, the speedi­er field­ing of de­fens­ive sys­tems would “not change Rus­sia’s se­cur­ity cal­cu­la­tion in Europe,” the White House ar­gued in a Monday state­ment of ad­min­is­tra­tion policy.

U.S. of­fi­cials also fear that short-range an­ti­mis­sile weaponry de­ployed to Po­land would “lim­it the abil­ity of the United States to meet its world­wide op­er­a­tion­al mis­sile de­fense re­quire­ments.”

The White House also op­posed bill lan­guage that would force the Pentagon to keep ex­ist­ing in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­sile silos avail­able for pos­sible use. The pro­vi­sion in ques­tion was spear­headed by law­makers from states host­ing these fa­cil­it­ies.

“While it is the pres­id­ent’s de­term­in­a­tion that 50 of the cur­rent 450 Minute­man 3 silos will re­main in a non-de­ployed — warm — status, this pro­vi­sion would tie the hands of all pres­id­ents with re­spect to force struc­ture through [Feb­ru­ary] 2021,” the state­ment of ad­min­is­tra­tion policy reads.

Of­fi­cials lamen­ted as “pre­ma­ture and po­ten­tially waste­ful” lan­guage to set aside $20 mil­lion for the plan­ning and design of an East Coast mis­sile field of long-range in­ter­cept­ors. Law­makers had in­ser­ted to pro­vi­sion with an eye to­ward boost­ing the de­fens­ive cap­ab­il­ity against a po­ten­tial at­tack from North Korea and else­where.

The Pentagon did not re­quest money for an East Coast site in its fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al. De­fense of­fi­cials have said they re­main un­sure if such a site is ne­ces­sary.

What We're Following See More »
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
3 days ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
3 days ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login