The Interior Department announced Thursday its long-awaited new rules for granting federal recognition to Native American tribes — but some lawmakers are already seeking changes.
Some members of Congress and officials on the state and local levels have been warily bracing for the proposed rules. Many have been worried about how far and wide they might open up new avenues for tribal casinos. They also are worried the rules might erode state tax bases and lead to new battles over historic lands.
The new rules by Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell and Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs Kevin Washburn would represent the reformation of a 35-year-old process by which the Interior officially recognizes Indian tribes.
The federal government already recognizes 566 tribes — but only 17 of those have been recognized under this 35-year-old process, which the proposal is seeking to revise.
And, in fact, the proposed changes announced Thursday keep and incorporate a key feature floated in a draft plan in June to provide recognition to a tribe that can show “community and political influence/authority from 1934 to the present,” rather than from as early as 1789 under existing rules.
The change would also eliminate the need for a petitioner to demonstrate that third parties identify them as a tribe from 1900 to the present.
Specifically, the rule change relates to the “Party 83 process” under Title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Procedures for Establishing That an American Indian Group Exists as an Indian Tribe.
“President Obama believes that reforming the federal acknowledgment process will strengthen our important trust relationship with Indian tribes,” said Jewell in a statement.
But the fear from some lawmakers and state and local politicians was that the new language devised by the Bureau of Indian Affairs could result in federal recognition for literally hundreds of tribes that for years have struggled and failed to receive that status — and could give them all the privileges that come with such recognition.
Connecticut officials were among those who responded in a lukewarm way to Thursday’s announcement. In a joint statement, Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy, Attorney General George Jepsen, U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, and Reps. Rosa DeLauro, John Larson, Joe Courtney, Jim Himes, and Elizabeth Etsy called the proposed revisions “a step in the right direction.”
“However, we believe additional changes and clarifications are necessary to ensure that Connecticut’s interests are protected, and we will continue to work for their inclusion,” they said.
The statement did not specify how they wanted it changed.
The Connecticut officials’ reaction comes amid concerns about its potential impact on the state’s current gambling agreement with the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes — which are already operating casinos there — and could further erode the state’s tax base.
The Eastern Pequot of North Stonington, the Golden Hill Paugussett of Colchester and Trumbull, and the Schaghticoke of Kent are reported to be among the tribes in that state that have been fighting for years to get federal recognition.
Federal recognition establishes the U.S. government as the trustee for tribal lands and resources and makes tribal members and governments eligible for federal budget assistance and program services. In short, this means the federal authorities would protect their sovereign status, their lands and tribal property, and their rights as a dependent nation.
What We're Following See More »
"Nearly a year before Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired senior FBI official Andrew McCabe for what Sessions called a 'lack of candor,'" McCabe launched a federal criminal investigation into whether Sessions withheld information from Congress regarding his contact with Russian operatives. "Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly accused Sessions of misleading them" during his testimony, "and called on federal authorities to investigate." When Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation, "several top Republican and Democratic lawmakers were informed of the probe during a closed-door briefing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and McCabe."
The Senate passed the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act, or SESTA, by a vote of 97-2. The bill now heads to the White House, where President Trump is expected to sign it into law. SESTA lifts federal immunity for internet platforms involved in sex trafficking, "a move that prosecutors, victims and anti-trafficking activists are heralding as an essential step in cracking down on the crime." Opponents of SESTA argue had argued that lifting the immunity could open websites up to lawsuits based on user-generated content, which could lead to a crackdown on free speech.
In a lengthy Facebook post, Mark Zuckerberg responded to reports that Cambridge Analytica had accessed the personal data of 50 million users, and kept the data after being told by the social media company to delete it. "I started Facebook," wrote Zuckerberg, "and at the end of the day I'm responsible for what happens on our platform ... While this specific issue involving Cambridge Analytica should no longer happen with new apps today, that doesn't change what happened in the past." On Monday, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, called for “Mr. Zuckerberg and other CEOs” to testify "about social media manipulation in the 2016 election."
"The White House is backing a $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill despite opposition from some House conservatives ... 'The President and the leaders discussed their support for the bill, which includes more funds to rebuild the military, such as the largest pay raise for our troops in a decade, more than 100 miles of new construction for the border wall and other key domestic priorities, like combatting the opioid crisis and rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure,' White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement." The details of the bill are expected to be released later today.