Senate Bill Would Create Separate Fund for New Trident Submarine

The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming approaches Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Ga., in January 2009. A key Senate defense panel on Thursday approved legislation that would establish a separate fund for financing the construction of a successor fleet.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Oswald
May 27, 2014, 6:26 a.m.

A Sen­ate de­fense pan­el wants to cre­ate a sep­ar­ate fund to un­der­write the na­tion’s new nuc­le­ar-armed sub­mar­ine fleet, a step the House also sup­ports.

The Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee’s mark-up of its an­nu­al de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion le­gis­la­tion calls for the es­tab­lish­ment of a “Na­tion­al Sea-based De­terrence Fund” to fin­ance the con­struc­tion of new sub­mar­ines to re­place today’s Ohio-class bal­list­ic mis­sile ves­sels, ac­cord­ing to a de­tailed pan­el sum­mary of the bill re­leased on Fri­day.

The Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled com­mit­tee ap­proved the le­gis­la­tion on Thursday by a near-un­an­im­ous vote. On the same day, the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled House passed its own ver­sion of the fisc­al 2015 policy-set­ting bill that also in­cluded lan­guage or­der­ing the cre­ation of a spe­cial fund to pay for the new “SSBN(X)” fleet.

The House le­gis­la­tion au­thor­izes the De­fense De­part­ment to trans­fer up to $3.5 bil­lion to the Ohio-class re­place­ment ac­count  from “un­oblig­ated funds” au­thor­ized for fisc­al years 2014 to 2016. Mean­while, the Sen­ate bill would au­thor­ize an ini­tial $100 mil­lion to get the fund go­ing.

Con­gres­sion­al sup­port for cre­at­ing a sep­ar­ate fund for the Ohio-class suc­cessor stems from con­cerns that the sub­mar­ine-build­ing ef­fort could eat up too much of the Navy’s over­all ship­build­ing budget. The pro­ject cur­rently is in the design and de­vel­op­ment stage, with con­struc­tion of the planned 12 new stra­tegic sub­mar­ines ex­pec­ted to start in fisc­al 2021. The ves­sels are to be armed ini­tially with the Navy’s nuc­le­ar-tipped Tri­dent D-5 bal­list­ic mis­sile.

The latest moves in the two cham­bers come on the heels of skep­ti­cism by a key sup­port­er of the sep­ar­ate-fund­ing idea for new sub­mar­ines, Rep­res­ent­at­ive Randy For­bes (R-Va.), who said re­cently that the ap­proach would be un­likely to gain full con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al this year.

Mean­while, the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee also ap­proved boost­ing funds for the Ground-based Mid­course De­fense sys­tem to the tune of $30 mil­lion above the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­quest. The ad­di­tion­al money is to be used “for im­prove­ments in re­li­ab­il­ity and main­ten­ance” of the an­ti­mis­sile pro­gram, ac­cord­ing to the sum­mary re­port.

The GMD pro­gram — com­pris­ing 30 Ground Based In­ter­cept­ors de­ployed in Cali­for­nia and Alaska, plus a net­work of sensors —  is the coun­try’s prin­cip­al line of de­fense against a lim­ited long-range bal­list­ic mis­sile at­tack. However, it has had a num­ber of re­cent test­ing prob­lems that have been so troub­ling that the Pentagon’s Mis­sile De­fense Agency in March an­nounced it would re­design the in­ter­cept­or’s front-end kill vehicle.

This comes as the mil­it­ary is plan­ning to pro­cure an­oth­er 14 in­ter­cept­ors for field­ing in Alaska, in re­sponse to a pos­sible mis­sile threat posed by North Korea.

The draft Sen­ate le­gis­la­tion would or­der the Pentagon to “de­vel­op a ro­bust ac­quis­i­tion plan” for the re­design of the kill vehicle, which uses kin­et­ic en­ergy to des­troy in­com­ing bal­list­ic mis­siles, in or­der “to provide con­fid­ence that it will work in an op­er­a­tion­ally ef­fect­ive man­ner,” the sum­mary states.

The bill also would man­date that the De­part­ment ad­here to the “fly-be­fore-you-buy” ap­proach for af­firm­ing through test­ing the sound­ness of bal­list­ic mis­sile de­fense tech­no­lo­gies be­fore they are pur­chased or de­ployed. The Mis­sile De­fense Agency has come un­der re­peated cri­ti­cism from in­de­pend­ent ex­perts and by Con­gress’ in­tern­al watch­dog for not suf­fi­ciently fol­low­ing this ac­quis­i­tion strategy in its de­vel­op­ment and ex­pan­sion of the Ground-based Mid­course De­fense pro­gram.

What We're Following See More »
ANNOUNCED BY SCARAMUCCI
Sarah Huckabee Sanders Is New Press Secretary
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
SAYS IT WAS “AN HONOR”
Spicer Staying on Through August
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
FIRST IN WEEKS
On-Camera Press Briefing Today at 2
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
HE LASTED SIX MONTHS
Sean Spicer Resigns
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

He resigned this morning, "telling President Trump he vehemently disagreed with the appointment of New York financier Anthony Scaramucci as communications director." Per Politico, "chief of staff Reince Priebus and chief strategist Steve Bannon" were opposed to the appointment, while "Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn, and Deputy National Security Adviser Dina Powell" were supportive..."Another White House official said Spicer was gracious while breaking the news of his departure, offered some praise for Scaramucci, while saying he would help with a transition."

Source:
STAFF IS PUSHING BACK
Trump Wants Scaramucci to Helm WH Communications
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump is expected to announce that Wall Street financier Anthony Scaramucci will be White House communications director, according to two sources familiar with the planning. Trump has left the role open since Mike Dubke resigned in May, and the President has vented frequently to his friends about the performance of his press operation." According to NBC News, Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus are resisting the move.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login