Are Your Menstrual Products Poisoning You?

Legislation introduced this week would increase research and regulation of potentially harmful ingredients in feminine-hygiene products.

NEW YORK - OCTOBER 19: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals activist Jen Huls stands dressed as a tampon outside of Columbia University during a protest October 19, 2004 in New York. PETA staged a protest alleging that Columbia researchers are conducting cruel menstrual tests on primates and subjecting them to painful conditions. (Photo by Chris Hondros/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
May 28, 2014, 2:22 p.m.

There may be even more reas­on for wo­men to dread that time of the month.

Fem­in­ine-hy­giene products like tam­pons and pads have been found to con­tain cer­tain in­gredi­ents that could be harm­ful to wo­men’s health, but con­sumers are left largely in the dark about po­ten­tial risks of the products they are us­ing.

Many men­stru­al-hy­giene products con­tain di­ox­in, syn­thet­ic fibers, chlor­ine, and fra­grances, but the amount of these in­gredi­ents — and the health risk they pose when used in these products — re­mains a bit of a ques­tion mark.

A re­port from Wo­men’s Voices for the Earth — a non­profit that seeks to elim­in­ate tox­ic chem­ic­als — links these in­gredi­ents to health prob­lems like en­do­crine dis­rup­tion, can­cer, and re­pro­duct­ive harm. The ex­tent of the risks as­so­ci­ated with fem­in­ine-hy­giene products are woe­fully un­der-re­searched, wo­men’s health ad­voc­ates say, but the fact that they are used on an ex­tremely ab­sorb­ent and per­meable area of the body raises the level of con­cern.

Rep. Car­o­lyn Malo­ney in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion Wed­nes­day that aims to cla­ri­fy these un­knowns. The Robin Daniel­son Act — named after a vic­tim of Tox­ic Shock Syn­drome from tam­pon use — would re­quire the Na­tion­al In­sti­tutes of Health to con­duct or sup­port re­search in­to these in­gredi­ents, en­cour­age the Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion to look more heav­ily in­to the risks of a vari­ety of men­stru­al products, in­crease over­sight of com­pany data sub­mit­ted to NIH and FDA, and re­quire pub­lic dis­clos­ure of the in­form­a­tion.

The de­gree to which these products are mon­itored by the FDA de­pends on their clas­si­fic­a­tion and level of risk, ac­cord­ing to an in­dustry spokes­per­son. Tam­pons and pads are clas­si­fied as med­ic­al devices and sub­ject to more reg­u­la­tion — par­tic­u­larly tam­pons be­cause of the threat of Tox­ic Shock Syn­drome. Oth­er fem­in­ine-hy­giene products like douche solu­tions and de­odor­izers are clas­si­fied as over-the-counter drugs or as cos­met­ics, de­pend­ing on the claims be­ing made, and they are sub­ject to less reg­u­la­tion. These are not gen­er­ally re­viewed by the FDA pri­or to mar­ket­ing.

The FDA does routinely mon­it­or di­ox­in levels in tam­pons, and the agency says con­cerns are largely un­foun­ded. While the agency has found trace di­ox­in levels in these products, the risk of neg­at­ive health im­pacts is “neg­li­gible,” it says.

Man­u­fac­tur­ers also main­tain that their products are se­cure. “The safety of wo­men is the found­a­tion of everything we do,” Mandy Cic­carella, a rep­res­ent­at­ive for Procter and Gamble — which owns Tam­pax and Al­ways brands — wrote in an email. “We share our fem­in­ine care product in­form­a­tion with in­de­pend­ent ex­perts — in­clud­ing med­ic­al con­sult­ants, uni­versity sci­ent­ists, and the FDA — so that wo­men can use our fem­in­ine-hy­giene products with con­fid­ence.”

But ad­voc­ates worry that even these small amounts of chem­ic­als could have a cu­mu­lat­ive ad­verse ef­fect, with thou­sands used over a life­time on an ex­tremely per­meable part of the body.

This is not the first time Rep. Malo­ney has in­tro­duced this kind of le­gis­la­tion; she’s been try­ing to pass it for more than a dec­ade. The New York Demo­crat first in­tro­duced tam­pon-safety le­gis­la­tion in 1997, in­tro­duced the first ver­sion of the Robin Daniel­son Act in 1999, and pushed sub­sequent ver­sions of the bill again in 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2011. The 2014 bill is dif­fer­ent in that it fo­cuses more on the reg­u­la­tion of oth­er types of fem­in­ine-hy­giene products be­sides tam­pons, said Rep. Malo­ney’s of­fice.

The biggest hurdle has been the un­will­ing­ness of law­makers to broach what could be con­sidered an un­com­fort­able sub­ject, ac­cord­ing to her of­fice.

“This is not ex­actly something con­gresspeople want go to the floor and talk about,” a spokes­per­son said.

What We're Following See More »
“PROFOUNDLY DANGEROUS”
Clinton Rips Into Trump
39 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.

SEVEN-POINT LEAD IN A FOUR-WAY
Quinnipiac Has Clinton Over 50%
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.

Source:
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
MIGHT STILL ACCEPT FOREIGN AND CORPORATE MONEY
Chelsea to Stay on Board of Clinton Foundation
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."

Source:
INTERCEPT IN MIDDLE EAST
Navy Calls Iranian Ships’ Actions Dangerous, Unprofessional
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.

Source:
×