During a testy and at times emotional four-hour hearing late Wednesday night, an official with the Veterans Affairs Department told the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee that reports of secret waiting lists at the Phoenix Health Care System are false.
“I was not able to identify any lists that I thought were secret,” the VA’s Assistant Deputy Undersecretary for Health for Clinical Operations, Dr. Thomas Lynch, told members Wednesday.
Lynch went on to explain that the lists were actually produced automatically by the VA’s data system when an appointment was canceled so that it could be rescheduled. Once a new appointment was made, the lists were destroyed, Lynch said, because they contained “patient-identifying information,” including Social Security numbers. Several members asked Lynch for the names of those responsible for destroying the documents, but he said he did not know.
In all of those cases, Lynch told reporters after the hearing, the appointments were canceled and rescheduled due to either clerical issues or the staff’s determination that they could see the veteran on an earlier date.
A preliminary report issued by the VA’s inspector general earlier on Wednesday found evidence of inappropriate scheduling tactics at the Phoenix VA that resulted in long delays and placed some of the blame on the fact that the department ties low wait times to staffers’ bonuses. Several media outlets have reported that those long lines for service resulted in at least 40 deaths, although the IG has not yet confirmed those figures.
Lynch agreed that the association between low wait times and bonus checks had led to problems at facilities across the country, but he added that intentions at the Phoenix facility were good. “I think that the management in Phoenix were making an honest effort to try to improve veterans’ access. I think they were trying to improve the timeliness in which care was being provided,” he said.
Lynch testified that he has been to the Phoenix facility three times in the past two months, where he met with officials, including the director and several schedulers. But he added that he did not meet with any of the whistle-blowers in the case, a statement that caused an uproar among members on both sides of the aisle on the House committee.
Lynch also said that he brought his wife with him on the first trip so that the two could celebrate Easter weekend together, which Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., called inappropriate. “I would just ask you, Doctor, to tell me how you could have possibly thought it was appropriate to turn such a critical, serious mission into a personal holiday?” she asked.
House Veterans Affairs’ Committee Chairman Jeff Miller, R-Calif., said after the hearing that he isn’t buying Lynch’s argument. “There are secret lists. There are multiple lists at some facilities that we have found.”¦ So this whole idea that this is a misunderstanding is a red herring. To try to claim that what they were doing was trying to provide quicker health care for veterans, let the facts speak for themselves. Veterans were not getting health care in a timely fashion,” Miller said.
Lynch did say that he agrees with the inspector general’s initial report, which was released earlier Wednesday and showed that the Phoenix Health Care System grossly overreported how quickly veterans were receiving care. That investigation found that, on average, a subsample of veterans waited 115 days for an initial appointment, while the Phoenix department reported that the average was 24 days. The VA recommends to its health care facilities that veterans wait no more than 14 days for an appointment.
The same report showed that 1,700 veterans at the Phoenix facility were still on a waiting list. Lynch told the committee Wednesday that each of those veterans would receive a call by Friday to schedule an appointment, or would be referred to an outside medical facility (where care would be paid for by the department) if their local VA system lacked room to see them. The department is currently conducting an inventory of wait lists nationwide and will make similar outreach efforts in the next few weeks, he added.
The hearing capped off a difficult day for relations between the Veterans Affairs Department and Capitol Hill, as a waterfall of members called for Secretary Eric Shinseki’s resignation, including a growing number of Democrats.
And members of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee were no friendlier. Democrats and Republicans on the committee expressed increasing frustration that their subpoena for documents related to the wait-list issues has not been fulfilled, adding a level of strain to the proceedings. Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo., even went so far as to add the names of all three department officials who testified Wednesday to the list of those who should step down from their jobs.
Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., got particularly colorful, telling Lynch: “What I don’t understand is, as a veteran, as a doctor, as a practitioner, how you can stand in a mirror and look at yourself in a mirror and shave in the morning and then not throw up knowing that you’ve got people out there “¦ [who] can’t get in.”
The officials vowed Wednesday to make an audit available to members of Congress concerning facilities located in their home districts in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, the Office of the Inspector General is expected to issue a full report on issues at the Veterans Affairs Department sometime in June.
What We're Following See More »
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.
Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."
In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."