Even as the number of Americans who support same-sex marriage reaches an all-time high, the ratio of Americans who believe that sexual orientation is innate to those who believe it is environmentally determined has remained relatively unchanged since the year 2000.
A Gallup Poll conducted earlier this month showed that 37 percent of Americans believe that being gay or lesbian is “due to factors such as upbringing and environment”; 42 percent think that people are born with their sexual orientation.
There is no consensus on the issue in today’s scientific community. “Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles,” the American Psychological Association writes. “Most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.”
There is evidence of physical differences between homosexual and heterosexual brains: A research project at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm found that “the brains of gay men and women in some aspects are similar to the brains of those of the opposite sex.” But those differences probably did not arise from environmental or genetic circumstances alone. Another study from the same institute examined differences between identical and fraternal twins in Sweden. It found that both genetic effects and the non-shared environment — that is, environmental differences in each twin’s upbringing — had moderate effects on determining sexual orientation.
But perhaps the question of nature versus nurture is not the question we — or Gallup — should be asking. “It’s not worthy of debate, necessarily,” said Ellen Kahn, director of the Human Rights Campaign’s Children, Youth & Families Program. “What your beliefs are is less relevant because we’re familiar, more and more, with gay and lesbian people. Why doesn’t matter as much.” This view is borne out by the data: Even as beliefs on the origins of sexual orientation remain the same, acceptance is steeply increasing every year.
The more pernicious question, Kahn said, has to do with malleability of sexual orientation. “We have to continue to point to volumes of scientific evidence that you cannot change your sexual orientation; the only thing you can do is choose to acknowledge it and share it.” A comprehensive 2009 APA review of journal literature on sexual-orientation change efforts found that attempts to alter a person’s orientation are “unlikely to be successful and involve some risk of harm.”
Perhaps, then, we should stop considering the nature-versus-nurture question altogether. Jamie Tabberer wrote in The Independent earlier this year, “For me, a resolution will come when people stop asking about it — because acceptance shouldn’t depend on the answer.”
What We're Following See More »
"Congress is considering attaching a narrow background check bill for gun purchases to a must-pass government funding package before the end of the week, when thousands of high school students are expected to congregate in Washington for the March to End Gun Violence. Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Tuesday said leadership was talking to its members about adding the background legislation, even as news broke of a new school shooting on Tuesday morning in Maryland."
"The House likely will not vote until Thursday on an omnibus spending bill, according to numerous lawmakers who attended a GOP conference meeting this morning. Some two dozen issues are still outstanding, members were told. The $1.3 trillion fiscal 2018 measure must be passed before government funding runs out Friday."
"President Trump is preparing to impose a package of $60 billion in annual tariffs against China, following through on a long-time threat that he says will punish China for intellectual property infringement and create more American jobs. The tariff package, which Trump plans to unveil by Friday, was confirmed by four senior administration officials. Senior aides had presented Trump with a $30 billion tariff package that would apply to a range of products, but Trump directed them to roughly double the scope of the new trade levies."
"President Trump’s attorneys have provided the special counsel’s office with written descriptions that chronicle key moments under investigation in hopes of curtailing the scope of a presidential interview, according to two people familiar with the situation. Trump’s legal team recently shared the documents in an effort to limit any session between the president and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to a few select topics" on order to "minimize his exposure. ... The lawyers are worried that Trump, who has a penchant for making erroneous claims, would be vulnerable in an hours-long interview."
White House Lawyer Ty Cobb said that President Trump not considering firing special counsel Robert Mueller. Speculation swirled after Trump attacked the investigation on Twitter, and called out Mueller directly for the first time. “In response to media speculation and related questions being posed to the Administration," Cobb said, "...the President is not considering or discussing the firing of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Several members of Congress, "including some top Republicans, warned Trump to not even think about terminating Mueller."