Classified Briefing on Bergdahl Trade Doesn’t Answer Questions for Critics

Administration officials showed senators video of Bergdahl to support claims that his health was failing.

A sign showing support for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl hangs outside Zaney's coffee shop where Bergdahl worked as a teenager on June 2, 2014 in Hailey, Idaho.
National Journal
June 4, 2014, 3:28 p.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion gave sen­at­ors a clas­si­fied brief­ing Wed­nes­day night on just what think­ing went in­to the pris­on­er trade to re­cov­er Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl from Afgh­anistan. But that won’t end ques­tions from Con­gress.

“This gen­tle­man needs to be looked in­to, quite ex­tens­ively,” said Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., fol­low­ing the brief­ing, re­fer­ring to ques­tions about wheth­er Ber­g­dahl deser­ted the mil­it­ary.

Dur­ing the clas­si­fied brief­ing, sen­at­ors were shown a roughly minute-and-a-half-long “proof of life” video of Ber­g­dahl, which the Taliban had provided, in which the sol­dier “didn’t look good,” said Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill.

A few sen­at­ors, in­clud­ing Manchin, ar­gued that the video could just as eas­ily have shown Ber­g­dahl un­der the in­flu­ence of drugs giv­en to him by his captors. Moreover, Manchin ar­gued, the video was giv­en to the ad­min­is­tra­tion in Decem­ber and wasn’t re­flect­ive of Ber­g­dahl’s state at the time of the trade. “His health was not a crit­ic­al factor,” a vis­ibly frus­trated Manchin told re­port­ers.

Sev­er­al Demo­crats who had already been sup­port­ive of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision emerged from the meet­ing with more con­fid­ence. Both Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Whip Dick Durbin and Sen. Mark Be­gich said they were sat­is­fied with the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­sponse, though Be­gich ad­ded that he still had some ques­tions.

“I think it was a very hard de­cision…. I might’ve come to the same con­clu­sion,” Durbin said.

When asked wheth­er he had con­fid­ence that the five Taliban mem­bers re­leased won’t kill any­more Amer­ic­ans, Durbin re­spon­ded: “How can you say that? How can I say that any­body in­ter­view­ing me is not go­ing to kill an Amer­ic­an? I will just tell you that when it comes down to it, they have been mem­bers of the Taliban, they were our en­emies, and that’s why they were de­tained. We have taken some steps to try to mon­it­or their con­duct through Qatar for at least one year, and that’s where we are. Thats why I don’t think this was an easy call. There’s the oth­er side of this equa­tion.”

But while of­fi­cials laid out de­tails on the terms of the pris­on­er ex­change and the con­di­tions of their re­lease, that did little to sway law­makers, mostly Re­pub­lic­ans, who had already been crit­ic­al of the deal.

“My con­cern from the be­gin­ning about this, I’ve not been re­as­sured, is the five high-risk Taliban de­tain­ees will not get back and reen­gage in the fight against us and our al­lies,” said Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. “And I was not sat­is­fied from the brief­ing that I re­ceived today that the con­di­tions that they’ve agreed upon are suf­fi­cient to en­sure that they won’t reen­gage back in the fight against us and threaten either Amer­ic­ans or our al­lies in some way.”

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Mc­Cain of Ari­zona said he at­ten­ded the meet­ing largely be­cause ques­tions would have been asked had he not ap­peared. These clas­si­fied brief­ings, he said, are nev­er pro­duct­ive. “Nev­er have I been to one that is,” he said.

An­oth­er ques­tion that came up dur­ing the brief­ing: wheth­er Ber­g­dahl was, in­deed, a desert­er. That’s one that Kirk says the ad­min­is­tra­tion ducked.

What We're Following See More »
8 SCHOOLS INCLUDING YALE, STANFORD, GEORGETOWN
Dept. of Education Opens Probe into College Admissions Scandal
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
HAD BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY
House Intel Postpones Testimony by Felix Sater
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
PASSED 420-0 IN THE HOUSE
McConnell Blocks Vote on Making Mueller Report Public
13 hours ago
THE LATEST
CITES "VERY CONCERNING DISCREPANCIES"
Nadler Intends to Call Barr to Testify
21 hours ago
THE LATEST
PICTURE IS CLOUDIER ON OBSTRUCTION
Mueller: No Evidence of Collusion
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr. The summary also said that the special counsel’s team lacked sufficient evidence to establish that President Trump illegally obstructed justice, but added that Mr. Mueller’s team stopped short of exonerating Mr. Trump." Read Barr's summary here.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login