The deep freeze between the United States and Cuba is really putting a damper on science.
Strained political relations make it difficult for scientists from both nations to collaborate on research — and the disconnect could have dangerous public-health consequences, scientists say.
Three scientists are making a plea for a change in policy in an editorial published Thursday in the journal Science, written by the heads of the American Association for the Advancement of Science: President Gerald Fink, CEO Alan Leshner, and Chief International Officer Vaughan Turekian.
Over a century ago, interactions between a Cuban scientist, Carlos Finlay, and a U.S. scientist, Jesse Lazear, led to an understanding of the role of the mosquito in transmitting yellow fever and to the development of effective countermeasures. Today, new infectious diseases confront both Cuba and the United States, but a longstanding diplomatic breach between the two nations now makes such valuable joint research more complicated, if not impossible.
It is time for both governments to reconsider the rules that stand in the way of scientific collaboration, before a potentially deadly outbreak spreads through both countries and beyond.
The scientists call for expanding the language regarding licenses under the Treasury Department’s Cuban Assets Control Regulations. The legislation currently allows civilian U.S. scientists to travel to Cuba to conduct research, but the scientists say it does not recognize joint U.S.-Cuba scientific conferences and workshops.
Scientists from both countries could put their heads together to monitor and research two highly infectious diseases: dengue, which has been reported in Cuba, and chikungunya, which is nearing the country’s shores via Haiti. Right now, no drugs or vaccines exist to combat them, in Cuba or the U.S. The AAAS scientists say that Cuba’s proximity to the U.S. mainland — just 90 miles south — and the number of Americans that regularly travel there create the risk for a stateside outbreak.
U.S. and Cuban scientists have recently tried to bridge the political divide. In April, members from the AAAS and the Cuban Academy of Sciences met in Havana, where they signed an agreement to cooperate in research on infectious and neurological diseases, cancer, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In May, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D”“R.I., an advocate of ocean science research, hosted a meeting between U.S. and Cuban marine scientists. The goal of the gathering was to make it easier for U.S. scientists to get government licenses to work in Cuba, and for scientific equipment to be shipped between the two countries.
“Getting scientific equipment to Cuba is very challenging because of the embargo, but also because Cuba is on the [U.S.] list of terrorist nations,” marine scientist David Guggenheim said back then.
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.