Hillary Clinton Steers Clear of Keystone Pipeline in New Book

Hillary Clinton’s memoir appears to completely ignore the controversial pipeline.

Protesters against the proposed Keystone XL pipeline hold placards across the street from where US President Barack Obama attends a Democratic Party fundraising event in San Francisco, California, on November 25, 2013. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
June 9, 2014, 8:15 a.m.

Fans and op­pon­ents wait­ing to hear Hil­lary Clin­ton’s po­s­i­tion on the con­tro­ver­sial Key­stone XL pipeline will have to keep bid­ing their time as her new book, des­pite stretch­ing to some 600 pages, doesn’t men­tion the pro­ject.

Key­stone is nowhere in the de­tailed in­dex of the book, Hard Choices, a mem­oir of her time as sec­ret­ary of State, which comes out Tues­day. And the pipeline goes un­men­tioned in a chapter de­voted to cli­mate change and second one on jobs and en­ergy, ac­cord­ing to sec­tions ob­tained by the Na­tion­al Journ­al.

Be­cause the pipeline, which would run from Al­berta, Canada to re­finer­ies on the Gulf Coast, crosses an in­ter­na­tion­al bor­der, Clin­ton’s State De­part­ment had pur­view over its ap­prov­al.

Her book’s 32-page-long in­dex, which con­tains hun­dreds of entries ran­ging from hot-but­ton top­ics like “Ber­g­dahl, Bowe” to ob­scure ones like the “My­it­sone Dam pro­ject” in Burma skips from “Key, John” to “Khal­ifa, Sheikh Khal­id bin Ahmed al” with no men­tion of Key­stone.

Chapter 21, titled “Cli­mate Change: We’re All in This To­geth­er,” de­tails Clin­ton’s com­mit­ment to ad­dress­ing glob­al warm­ing, which she writes is both a “sig­ni­fic­ant na­tion­al se­cur­ity threat and a ma­jor test of Amer­ic­an lead­er­ship.” In Chapter 22, called “Jobs and En­ergy: A Level Play­ing Field,” Clin­ton writes that the U.S. needs to be a glob­al lead­er in clean en­ergy. Neither chapter men­tions the con­tro­ver­sial pipeline.

Clin­ton’s spokes­per­son did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment.

Dur­ing a March speak­ing ap­pear­ance in Van­couver, former Ca­na­dian Am­bas­sad­or to the United States Frank McK­enna tried to ask Clin­ton about the pipeline. “No com­ment,” she replied, ex­plain­ing that it would be im­prop­er for her to com­ment on a de­cision still pending be­fore State.

As sec­ret­ary of State, Clin­ton mostly stayed quiet on the pro­ject while it was mak­ing its way through the form­al ap­prov­al pro­cess. But in Oc­to­ber 2010, just as en­vir­on­ment­al groups were step­ping up their fight against Key­stone, Clin­ton told the Com­mon­wealth Club of San Fran­cisco that State was “in­clined” to ap­prove the pipeline “for sev­er­al reas­ons.” Un­til the U.S. can scale up clean-en­ergy al­tern­at­ives, she ex­plained, “we’re either go­ing to be de­pend­ent on dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada.”

Clin­ton’s State De­part­ment urged against ap­prov­al in Janu­ary of 2012, but cited the short ap­prov­al time frame Con­gress im­posed on the de­part­ment rather than the un­der­ly­ing mer­its of the pro­ject. After nu­mer­ous delays, Clin­ton stepped down from State be­fore the pipeline was ap­proved, and it is still pending be­fore Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry’s de­part­ment today.

Even be­fore her book came out, Clin­ton came un­der pres­sure from green groups to come out against the pipeline. A co­ali­tion of 30 groups fight­ing Key­stone, which they be­lieve would con­trib­ute to cli­mate change, wrote an open let­ter last month ask­ing the former sec­ret­ary of State to join their ef­forts. “Giv­en your long-stand­ing ad­vocacy for the en­vir­on­ment and the im­port­ance of bat­tling the cli­mate crisis, your in­volve­ment would lend an im­port­ant voice to the struggle against this dan­ger­ous pipeline.”

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login