Opinion

STEM Education Is a Civil-Rights Issue

Advocating for equal access to STEM education isn’t merely a new feel-good fad.

Wade Henderson is the President and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more than 200 national civil rights and human rights organizations.
National Journal
Wade Henderson
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Wade Henderson
June 10, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

New data show­ing that Google’s pool of em­ploy­ees is 2 per­cent black, 3 per­cent His­pan­ic, and 30 per­cent fe­male are get­ting lots of at­ten­tion. While Google should be cred­ited for be­ing the first tech com­pany to re­lease its num­bers, the lack of di­versity at com­pan­ies like Google is just a symp­tom of our na­tion’s fail­ure to provide equal ac­cess to the kinds of sci­ence, tech­no­logy, en­gin­eer­ing, and math classes (of­ten called STEM) that pre­pare stu­dents for highly skilled, highly tech­nic­al jobs and ca­reers.

It’s time to ex­am­ine where and how we are los­ing so many chil­dren along the K-16 STEM pipeline and to ac­cel­er­ate pro­gress in clos­ing both op­por­tun­ity and achieve­ment gaps. We can’t be­gin to level the play­ing field without do­ing so.

Re­cent data from the Col­lege Board and the Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment’s Civil Rights Data Col­lec­tion make clear that we’re send­ing our chil­dren of col­or to schools that are not pre­par­ing them for our high-tech eco­nomy. In 2013, no Afric­an-Amer­ic­an stu­dents took the Ad­vanced Place­ment ex­am in com­puter sci­ence in 11 state. The same was true for Latino stu­dents in eight states. Shame­fully, one-quarter of high schools with the highest per­cent­age of black and Latino stu­dents don’t even of­fer Al­gebra II, and one-third of them don’t of­fer chem­istry. How can we pos­sibly ex­pect our chil­dren to com­pete ef­fect­ively in the glob­al job mar­ket without tak­ing chem­istry?

The prob­lem isn’t lim­ited to the na­tion’s rap­idly ex­pand­ing minor­ity pop­u­la­tion. In 2013, only 20 per­cent of AP com­puter sci­ence test-takers were fe­male. Wo­men already com­prise the ma­jor­ity of stu­dents on our col­lege cam­puses and also make up about 46 per­cent of the work­force. Why then do they rep­res­ent less than 20 per­cent of bach­el­or’s de­grees awar­ded in fields like com­puter sci­ence and en­gin­eer­ing, and hold less than one-quarter of STEM jobs?

These fig­ures are un­con­scion­able. Un­til we start to mean­ing­fully ad­dress this crisis, we will con­tin­ue to ex­clude people of col­or and wo­men from the new high-skilled eco­nomy.

Em­ploy­ment in STEM-re­lated oc­cu­pa­tions is pro­jec­ted to cre­ate about 1 mil­lion jobs — ex­pand­ing the sec­tor to in­clude more than 9 mil­lion po­s­i­tions — between 2012 and 2022, ac­cord­ing to the Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics. Fed­er­al data also show that work­ers in STEM oc­cu­pa­tions earned a me­di­an an­nu­al wage that was more than double the me­di­an wage for all work­ers in May 2013. And even though a gender wage gap still ex­ists in STEM oc­cu­pa­tions, it is smal­ler than the gender wage gap in oth­er fields.

In short: Ac­cess to STEM jobs is an on-ramp to high­er than av­er­age wages in ex­pand­ing fields where jobs are ex­pec­ted to be plen­ti­ful.

In late May, the Lead­er­ship Con­fer­ence Edu­ca­tion Fund joined with the Edu­ca­tion­al Test­ing Ser­vice to con­vene a sym­posi­um at the Na­tion­al Academy of Sci­ences to dis­cuss equal ac­cess to STEM edu­ca­tion as a crit­ic­al civil-rights con­cern and to ex­am­ine ways to ad­dress the dis­par­it­ies. At the same time that ex­perts from a range of sec­tors at our sym­posi­um ac­know­ledged STEM in­equit­ies, bright young minds were gath­er­ing at the White House for its an­nu­al sci­ence fair — an event that this year placed spe­cial fo­cus on wo­men and girls who are ex­cel­ling in STEM.

Pres­id­ent Obama also an­nounced sev­er­al up­com­ing ini­ti­at­ives, in­clud­ing a $35 mil­lion Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment com­pet­i­tion, an ex­pan­sion of STEM Ameri­Corps. It will provide STEM learn­ing op­por­tun­it­ies for 18,000 low-in­come stu­dents this sum­mer, and a na­tion­al STEM ment­or­ing ef­fort in­volving tech­no­logy and me­dia com­pan­ies, non­profits, and oth­ers work­ing to con­nect more stu­dents to STEM.

These are im­port­ant steps. But we also need pro­grams like Race to the Top for Equity and Op­por­tun­ity, which would in­vest $300 mil­lion in proven ap­proaches across the K-12 pipeline, such as pla­cing our best teach­ers in high-need schools, ex­pand­ing ac­cess to AP and col­lege-prep classes, and equal­iz­ing spend­ing between every school dis­trict’s rich and poor schools.

The new Race to the Top would also fund pos­it­ive be­ha­vi­or sup­ports and fair dis­cip­line policies, and help to fin­ance ex­pan­ded learn­ing hours. Dur­ing her key­note ad­dress at our May sym­posi­um, Cath­er­ine Lhamon, the as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary at Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment’s Of­fice for Civil Rights, called this ini­ti­at­ive the Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment’s highest pri­or­ity in the budget.

It’s this type of change — change in­ten­ded to knock down sys­tem­ic edu­ca­tion­al and eco­nom­ic bar­ri­ers — that should be ad­op­ted by states and school dis­tricts across the coun­try. The policies and fund­ing that will do this work na­tion­ally should also rank among the top pri­or­it­ies of Con­gress.

Ad­voc­at­ing for STEM edu­ca­tion and equal ac­cess to it isn’t merely a new feel-good fad. It’s crit­ic­al that we make sure that its op­por­tun­it­ies are equally avail­able to every child so that they may be full par­ti­cipants in our dy­nam­ic and con­stantly chan­ging world.

Wade Hende­r­son is the pres­id­ent and CEO of the Lead­er­ship Con­fer­ence on Civil and Hu­man Rights, a co­ali­tion of more than 200 na­tion­al civil-rights and hu­man-rights or­gan­iz­a­tions.

HAVE AN OPIN­ION ON POLICY AND CHAN­GING DEMO­GRAPH­ICS? The Next Amer­ica wel­comes op-ed pieces that ex­plore the polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic and so­cial im­pacts of the pro­found ra­cial and cul­tur­al changes fa­cing our na­tion, par­tic­u­larly rel­ev­ant to edu­ca­tion, eco­nomy, the work­force and health. Email Jan­ell Ross at jross@na­tion­al­journ­al.com. Please fol­low us on Twit­ter and Face­book.

What We're Following See More »
ABSENT FROM LIST: GENNIFER FLOWERS
Most Trump Guests Have Military Ties
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
TOP OF MIND
Trending on Google: ‘Why Should Trump Not Be President’
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS
WHO PLAYED THE DONALD?
Longtime Clinton Aide Played Trump in Mock Debates
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

After keeping the information private for most of the lead-up to the debate on Monday, it has been revealed that longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines has been playing the role of Donald Trump in her debate prep. Reines knows Clinton better than most, able to identify both her strengths and weaknesses, and his selection for a sparring partner shows that Clinton is preparing for the brash and confrontational Donald Trump many have come to expect.

Source:
WEEKEND POLLING ROUNDUP
New Polls Still Show Razor-Thin Margins
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
  • A national Washington Post/ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Trump by just two points among likely voters, 46% to 44%.
  • A national Bloomberg poll out Monday morning by Selzer & Co. has Clinton and Trump tied at 46% in a two-way race, and Trump ahead 43% to 41% in a four-way race.
  • A CNN/ORC poll in Colorado shows likely voters’ support for Trump at 42%, 41% for Clinton, and a CNN/ORC poll in Pennsylvania has Clinton at 45% and Trump at 44%.
  • A Portland Press Herald/UNH survey in Maine has Clinton leading Trump in ME-01 and Trump ahead in ME-02.
THE QUESTION
How Many Times Has the Trump Campaign Emailed Ted Cruz’s Supporters?
5 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 30 times, in the case of some donors. Long before Cruz endorsed Trump—and before he even snubbed the nominee at the Republican National Convention—"the senator quietly began renting his vast donor email file to his former rival, pocketing at least tens of thousands of dollars, and more likely hundreds of thousands, that can be used to bankroll the Texan’s own political future."

Source:
×