White House Knew Bergdahl Swap Would Go Through a Day Before It Happened

A top Senate Democrat says there was no time for the Obama administration to notify Congress 30 days in advance of the trade.

National Journal
Michael Catalin and Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin Elahe Izadi
June 10, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

One reas­on the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion may have not aler­ted Con­gress 30 days in ad­vance of the Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dal swap: It made the de­cision right be­fore it took place.

“They knew a day ahead of time that the trans­fer was go­ing to take place. They knew an hour ahead of time where it was go­ing to take place,” the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Demo­crat, Dick Durbin, told a small group of re­port­ers Tues­day.

Pres­id­ent Obama has said that the swap re­quired quick ac­tion: “We had to act fast in a del­ic­ate situ­ation that re­quired no pub­li­city,” Obama said Fri­day on NBC Nightly News.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has also ar­gued that it put Con­gress “on no­tice” back in Decem­ber 2013, via a sign­ing state­ment from Obama re­lat­ing spe­cific­ally to a re­quire­ment that the ad­min­is­tra­tion no­ti­fy Con­gress 30 days in ad­vance of re­leas­ing any pris­on­ers from Guantanamo Bay. Ad­di­tion­ally, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials point out that they had pre­vi­ously briefed law­makers on the idea of swap­ping these five Taliban lead­ers.

Durbin says it was “im­possible” for the pres­id­ent to strike the deal and then wait 30 days, say­ing it could have “en­dangered the man’s life” by wait­ing.

“So we have a pro­vi­sion in the law about 30-day no­ti­fic­a­tion which doesn’t square with real­ity. Could he, could any­one have con­tac­ted Con­gress soon­er? Per­haps,” Durbin said. “But this no­tion of 30 days, I can’t be­lieve any­body’s ar­guing, ‘Well as soon as we knew there was a trans­fer we had to wait for Con­gress to think it over for 30 days.’ That is not in the best in­terests.”

But that ar­gu­ment doesn’t sat­is­fy every­one on Cap­it­ol Hill. A num­ber of law­makers, par­tic­u­larly Re­pub­lic­ans, emerged from a closed Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee brief­ing Tues­day still crit­ic­al of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision to make the swap without more of a heads-up to Con­gress.

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Tim Kaine of Vir­gin­ia said the 30-day no­tice is­sue is one out­stand­ing prob­lem for him. “I’m still troubled by wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion met the 30-day re­quire­ment and I’m dig­ging in­to that fur­ther,” he said.

Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Carl Lev­in said ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials presen­ted some ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion that was not in­cluded in last week’s all-sen­at­ors closed brief­ing. On Tues­day, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials fo­cused more on “the leg­al reas­on” for why the 30-day no­tice was not needed, namely point­ing to Art­icle II of the Con­sti­tu­tion, which spe­cifies the pres­id­ent’s role as com­mand­er-in-chief.

Lev­in later said that of­fi­cials knew of the de­tailed loc­a­tion “a few hours” be­fore the swap and that the deal had come to­geth­er in just “a mat­ter of days.”

This story was up­dated at 12:15 with fur­ther com­ment from Sen. Lev­in.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
×