White House Knew Bergdahl Swap Would Go Through a Day Before It Happened

A top Senate Democrat says there was no time for the Obama administration to notify Congress 30 days in advance of the trade.

National Journal
Michael Catalin and Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin Elahe Izadi
June 10, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

One reas­on the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion may have not aler­ted Con­gress 30 days in ad­vance of the Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dal swap: It made the de­cision right be­fore it took place.

“They knew a day ahead of time that the trans­fer was go­ing to take place. They knew an hour ahead of time where it was go­ing to take place,” the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Demo­crat, Dick Durbin, told a small group of re­port­ers Tues­day.

Pres­id­ent Obama has said that the swap re­quired quick ac­tion: “We had to act fast in a del­ic­ate situ­ation that re­quired no pub­li­city,” Obama said Fri­day on NBC Nightly News.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has also ar­gued that it put Con­gress “on no­tice” back in Decem­ber 2013, via a sign­ing state­ment from Obama re­lat­ing spe­cific­ally to a re­quire­ment that the ad­min­is­tra­tion no­ti­fy Con­gress 30 days in ad­vance of re­leas­ing any pris­on­ers from Guantanamo Bay. Ad­di­tion­ally, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials point out that they had pre­vi­ously briefed law­makers on the idea of swap­ping these five Taliban lead­ers.

Durbin says it was “im­possible” for the pres­id­ent to strike the deal and then wait 30 days, say­ing it could have “en­dangered the man’s life” by wait­ing.

“So we have a pro­vi­sion in the law about 30-day no­ti­fic­a­tion which doesn’t square with real­ity. Could he, could any­one have con­tac­ted Con­gress soon­er? Per­haps,” Durbin said. “But this no­tion of 30 days, I can’t be­lieve any­body’s ar­guing, ‘Well as soon as we knew there was a trans­fer we had to wait for Con­gress to think it over for 30 days.’ That is not in the best in­terests.”

But that ar­gu­ment doesn’t sat­is­fy every­one on Cap­it­ol Hill. A num­ber of law­makers, par­tic­u­larly Re­pub­lic­ans, emerged from a closed Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee brief­ing Tues­day still crit­ic­al of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision to make the swap without more of a heads-up to Con­gress.

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Tim Kaine of Vir­gin­ia said the 30-day no­tice is­sue is one out­stand­ing prob­lem for him. “I’m still troubled by wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion met the 30-day re­quire­ment and I’m dig­ging in­to that fur­ther,” he said.

Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Carl Lev­in said ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials presen­ted some ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion that was not in­cluded in last week’s all-sen­at­ors closed brief­ing. On Tues­day, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials fo­cused more on “the leg­al reas­on” for why the 30-day no­tice was not needed, namely point­ing to Art­icle II of the Con­sti­tu­tion, which spe­cifies the pres­id­ent’s role as com­mand­er-in-chief.

Lev­in later said that of­fi­cials knew of the de­tailed loc­a­tion “a few hours” be­fore the swap and that the deal had come to­geth­er in just “a mat­ter of days.”

This story was up­dated at 12:15 with fur­ther com­ment from Sen. Lev­in.

What We're Following See More »
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
$1.6 BILLION SET ASIDE FOR WALL
House Freedom Caucus Chair: Shutdown Over Wall Funding Unlikely
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login