White House Knew Bergdahl Swap Would Go Through a Day Before It Happened

A top Senate Democrat says there was no time for the Obama administration to notify Congress 30 days in advance of the trade.

National Journal
Michael Catalin and Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin Elahe Izadi
June 10, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

One reas­on the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion may have not aler­ted Con­gress 30 days in ad­vance of the Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dal swap: It made the de­cision right be­fore it took place.

“They knew a day ahead of time that the trans­fer was go­ing to take place. They knew an hour ahead of time where it was go­ing to take place,” the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Demo­crat, Dick Durbin, told a small group of re­port­ers Tues­day.

Pres­id­ent Obama has said that the swap re­quired quick ac­tion: “We had to act fast in a del­ic­ate situ­ation that re­quired no pub­li­city,” Obama said Fri­day on NBC Nightly News.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has also ar­gued that it put Con­gress “on no­tice” back in Decem­ber 2013, via a sign­ing state­ment from Obama re­lat­ing spe­cific­ally to a re­quire­ment that the ad­min­is­tra­tion no­ti­fy Con­gress 30 days in ad­vance of re­leas­ing any pris­on­ers from Guantanamo Bay. Ad­di­tion­ally, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials point out that they had pre­vi­ously briefed law­makers on the idea of swap­ping these five Taliban lead­ers.

Durbin says it was “im­possible” for the pres­id­ent to strike the deal and then wait 30 days, say­ing it could have “en­dangered the man’s life” by wait­ing.

“So we have a pro­vi­sion in the law about 30-day no­ti­fic­a­tion which doesn’t square with real­ity. Could he, could any­one have con­tac­ted Con­gress soon­er? Per­haps,” Durbin said. “But this no­tion of 30 days, I can’t be­lieve any­body’s ar­guing, ‘Well as soon as we knew there was a trans­fer we had to wait for Con­gress to think it over for 30 days.’ That is not in the best in­terests.”

But that ar­gu­ment doesn’t sat­is­fy every­one on Cap­it­ol Hill. A num­ber of law­makers, par­tic­u­larly Re­pub­lic­ans, emerged from a closed Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee brief­ing Tues­day still crit­ic­al of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision to make the swap without more of a heads-up to Con­gress.

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Tim Kaine of Vir­gin­ia said the 30-day no­tice is­sue is one out­stand­ing prob­lem for him. “I’m still troubled by wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion met the 30-day re­quire­ment and I’m dig­ging in­to that fur­ther,” he said.

Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Carl Lev­in said ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials presen­ted some ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion that was not in­cluded in last week’s all-sen­at­ors closed brief­ing. On Tues­day, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials fo­cused more on “the leg­al reas­on” for why the 30-day no­tice was not needed, namely point­ing to Art­icle II of the Con­sti­tu­tion, which spe­cifies the pres­id­ent’s role as com­mand­er-in-chief.

Lev­in later said that of­fi­cials knew of the de­tailed loc­a­tion “a few hours” be­fore the swap and that the deal had come to­geth­er in just “a mat­ter of days.”

This story was up­dated at 12:15 with fur­ther com­ment from Sen. Lev­in.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
19 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
21 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
22 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login