Beijing and Washington are studying multiple paths for restarting frozen nuclear negotiations with North Korea, a South Korean diplomat said on Tuesday.
“South Korea, the U.S. and China have been seeking various options to resume a meaningful dialogue on denuclearization [with North Korea],” South Korea’s senior negotiator to the paralyzed six-party talks, Hwang Joon-kook, told the Yonhap News Agency.
Hwang was speaking in Beijing, where he was scheduled to discuss the North Korean nuclear impasse with his Chinese opposite at the six-nation negotiations, Wu Dawei.
The multinational aid-for-denuclearization negotiations involving China, the two Koreas, Japan, Russia and the United States have been at a standstill since 2008. While Pyongyang has voiced interest in returning to the negotiating table, it has balked at taking any initial steps demanded by Washington to end its nuclear arms activities as a condition of the talks resuming. Beijing has argued against placing any preconditions on future talks.
Elsewhere, Japanese officials are slated to visit Sandia National Laboratories later this week as part of an Extended Deterrence Dialogue with the United States, the U.S. State Department said in a Monday press release.
The visit to the U.S. nuclear weapons complex in New Mexico is intended to “deepen [Japanese] understanding of the strategic weapons systems that support U.S. extended deterrence guarantees,” the department said. Japan is under the U.S. nuclear umbrella.
Separately, U.S. and South Korean airmen late last month conducted an exercise at Kunsan Air Base involving the response to a weapon of mass destruction, according to a Monday U.S. Pacific Command press release. In addition to its nuclear program, the North is assumed to have active chemical and biological weapons programs that officials fear could be used in attacks against South Korea.
Meanwhile, Singapore on Tuesday announced the filing of charges against a merchant firm, Chinpo Shipping Company, for allegedly helping to facilitate an illegal arms deal between Cuba and North Korea that was uncovered last summer, Reuters reported. U.N. Security Council sanctions outlaw all weapons commerce with Pyongyang.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."