Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz: Careful Critics of Obama’s Bergdahl Swap

The 2016 contenders won’t box themselves in on the president’s use of the controversial “signing statement.”

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 16: U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) speaks after meeting with Republican senators regarding a bipartisan solution for the pending budget and debt limit impasse at the U.S. Capitol October 16, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Senate announced that it had reached a bipartisan deal on funding the federal government and the extending the nation's debt limit after 16 days of a government shutdown.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
Clara Ritger
June 10, 2014, 2:53 p.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans are out­raged that Pres­id­ent Obama ig­nored U.S. law and re­leased Taliban sus­pects from Guantanamo without first no­ti­fy­ing Con­gress. This, even as the “sign­ing state­ment” that Obama at­tached to the law fore­told his in­ten­tion.

But guess whose pique is a little more nu­anced.

“There have been mul­tiple pres­id­ents who have used sign­ing state­ments for dif­fer­ent pur­poses, so it is wrong to speak of sign­ing state­ments in blanket terms,” said Sen. Ted Cruz as a pre­amble to his ro­bust cri­ti­cism of the pres­id­ent’s de­cision to swap Taliban sus­pects for Amer­ic­an pris­on­er of war Bowe Ber­g­dahl.

An­oth­er lead­ing 2016 pres­id­en­tial hope­ful, Marco Ru­bio, offered a bit of the same. He dodged the ques­tion of the sign­ing state­ment al­to­geth­er, im­ply­ing that pres­id­ents do in­deed have the au­thor­ity to do what’s ne­ces­sary to en­sure U.S. se­cur­ity.

“Most of these laws have a na­tion­al se­cur­ity waiver built in­to them,” he said. “The more im­port­ant is­sue here is not wheth­er Con­gress re­ceived a heads-up. The most im­port­ant is­sue is that five ex­tremely dan­ger­ous anti-Amer­ic­an ter­ror­ists have been re­leased, and I think a pre­ced­ent has been set.”

Many pres­id­ents have at­tached sign­ing state­ments to le­gis­la­tion, but their use as tools by the ex­ec­ut­ive branch to shape laws star­ted un­der the Re­agan ad­min­is­tra­tion, when then-law­yer, now-Su­preme Court Justice Samuel Alito is­sued a memo en­cour­aging the ex­pan­sion of ex­ec­ut­ive power through such state­ments.

Pres­id­ent George W. Bush is­sued more than 150 sign­ing state­ments that de­clared how he in­ten­ded to en­force the law, and he claimed con­sti­tu­tion­al au­thor­ity to make changes or dis­reg­ard parts of the law if ne­ces­sary, a con­tro­ver­sial prac­tice that promp­ted the Amer­ic­an Bar As­so­ci­ation to study its con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity and ul­ti­mately is­sue re­com­mend­a­tions against it.

Obama said dur­ing his first cam­paign for the White House that he would not use state­ments to nul­li­fy con­gres­sion­al in­struc­tions, and while he has is­sued re­l­at­ively few sign­ing state­ments com­pared with his pre­de­cessor, the one he is us­ing now to de­fend the Ber­g­dahl swap ap­pears to vi­ol­ate that cam­paign prom­ise.

There’s one Re­pub­lic­an on the 2016 lead­er board who hasn’t shied away from dir­ectly ad­dress­ing the use of sign­ing state­ments. That’s Rand Paul, of­ten the most vo­ci­fer­ous crit­ic of not only Obama but the ex­pan­sion of ex­ec­ut­ive power.

“I ob­jec­ted to Bush’s sign­ing state­ments, I ob­jec­ted to this pres­id­ent’s sign­ing state­ments,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “That would be akin to the pres­id­ent le­gis­lat­ing. It’s un­equi­voc­ally un­con­sti­tu­tion­al.”

Elahe Izadii contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
3 days ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
3 days ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login