Alaska Senate Candidate Wants to Ban Outside Money — but Only in Alaska

Dan Sullivan, a Republican Senate candidate, proposed a pledge to limit outside spending in his race against Mark Begich.

National Journal
Andrea Drusch
Add to Briefcase
Andrea Drusch
June 10, 2014, 1:06 p.m.

Former Alaska Attorney General and current Senate candidate Dan Sullivan supports outside groups spending big money on political campaigns — just not in his state.

Sullivan on Tuesday asked his Democratic opponent, Sen. Mark Begich, to sign a pledge stopping third-party groups from airing TV ads in Alaska. The proposed agreement, which Sullivan said he delivered to a Begich campaign office Tuesday, would stipulate that if any group runs ads in Alaska after July 4, the benefiting candidate’s campaign would have to make a contribution to charity worth half the amount of the ad buy. (Party committees, such as the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, would be excluded from the agreement.)

It’s a move reminiscent of the “People’s Pledge” in 2012, a deal struck between Democrat Elizabeth Warren and then-Sen. Scott Brown, a Republican, to limit outside influence on their Massachusetts Senate race. And it comes in a state that outside groups have made a top target in 2014 — collectively, they’ve already reserved $20 million worth of TV ads there, an enormous sum for a state with a sparse population.

“This is nothing new; it has been done, it works,” Sullivan said in a conference call with reporters. “All it takes now to work in Alaska is to have Mark Begich’s signature on it.”¦ This is one point on which we should see eye to eye.”

The Democrat hasn’t yet offered up a position on the pledge. But the Republican was less ready to answer whether such outside spending should be allowed in other states.

Asked by National Journal whether Sullivan supported the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which contributed to the rise of powerful outside groups such as American Crossroads and Senate Majority PAC, Sullivan demurred, saying he very much supports “strong free speech.” The pledge, he said, was not a reference to Citizens United.

Sullivan failed to directly answer two follow-up questions about Citizens United from local media in Alaska, one of which asked whether all states shouldn’t have the privilege of elections free from outside influence.

“This is not about Citizen United, this is not about legislation pending or looking to be introduced in Congress,” Sullivan said. “This is about the way we think this race should be conducted in Alaska to give our citizens voice.”¦This is an unprecedented sum of third-party special-interest money.”

In a follow-up call after the conversation, campaign spokesman Mike Anderson gave the first affirmative support for the decision. “At the end of the day, Dan does support Citizens United,” Anderson said.

This is the first time Sullivan has voiced his opinion on the decision, but he wrote in a response to the Associated Press in June that “Sen. Begich has had more than five years to address the influence of outside groups in elections” and still hadn’t accomplished anything.

Sullivan is still in the midst of a three-way race for the Republican nomination. He will take on Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell and 2010 Senate candidate Joe Miller on Aug. 14.

Sullivan said Treadwell and Miller had not been asked to sign the pledge because they hadn’t yet been hit by outside ads.

Begich’s campaign fired back with a response that afternoon criticizing Sullivan’s hesitation on the question.

“Sullivan again tried to tell Alaskans one thing, but then quickly revealed the truth today — he supports allowing corporations to engage in unlimited spending in our elections,” said Susanne Fleek-Green, campaign manager for Alaskans for Begich. “If Dan Sullivan makes it out of his competitive primary, it will be a stark contrast between his put-corporations-first position and Senator Begich’s support for real campaign finance reform, including support of a constitutional amendment throwing out Citizens United.

What We're Following See More »
ARGUE FOR DISTRICT-BASED ALLOCATION
Boies Heads Legal Team Challenging Electoral Vote Allocation
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A coalition of law firms led by Boies Schiller Flexner and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) announced Wednesday they filed lawsuits in four states challenging the winner-take-all method used to allocate electors in presidential elections. The lawsuits—filed in two Democratic-leaning states, Massachusetts and California, and two traditionally Republican states, South Carolina and Texas—claim the winner-take-all system violates the constitutional rights to free association, political expression and equal protection."

Source:
LOAN IN EXCHANGE FOR WHITE HOUSE JOB?
Investigators Looking at More Manafort Shenanigans
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
FORMER TRUMP AIDE
Mueller To Interview Sam Nunberg Tomorrow
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
CITES CLIMATE CHANGE AND HEALTH IMPACTS
Hundreds of Mayors Oppose Reversal of Clean Power Plan
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

236 mayors, representing cities in 47 states and territories, signed a letter to the EPA opposing the Trump administration's move to roll back the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan (CPP)." The letter says a roll back would have "devastating health and economic impacts on their communities." The EPA has been considering a plan to repeal the Clean Power Plan since at least October.

Source:
UNANIMOUS RULING
SCOTUS Narrows Whistleblower Protections Under Dodd-Frank
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday narrowed the scope of whistleblower protection under the Dodd-Frank Act, ruling unanimously that employees must first report alleged securities violations to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The decision in Digital Realty v. Somers stated that simply complaining of wrongdoing within the employee’s company does not trigger the protections of the law."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login