Alaska Senate Candidate Wants to Ban Outside Money — but Only in Alaska

Dan Sullivan, a Republican Senate candidate, proposed a pledge to limit outside spending in his race against Mark Begich.

National Journal
Andrea Drusch
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Andrea Drusch
June 10, 2014, 1:06 p.m.

Former Alaska At­tor­ney Gen­er­al and cur­rent Sen­ate can­did­ate Dan Sul­li­van sup­ports out­side groups spend­ing big money on polit­ic­al cam­paigns — just not in his state.

Sul­li­van on Tues­day asked his Demo­crat­ic op­pon­ent, Sen. Mark Be­gich, to sign a pledge stop­ping third-party groups from air­ing TV ads in Alaska. The pro­posed agree­ment, which Sul­li­van said he de­livered to a Be­gich cam­paign of­fice Tues­day, would stip­u­late that if any group runs ads in Alaska after Ju­ly 4, the be­ne­fit­ing can­did­ate’s cam­paign would have to make a con­tri­bu­tion to char­ity worth half the amount of the ad buy. (Party com­mit­tees, such as the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, would be ex­cluded from the agree­ment.)

It’s a move re­min­is­cent of the “People’s Pledge” in 2012, a deal struck between Demo­crat Eliza­beth War­ren and then-Sen. Scott Brown, a Re­pub­lic­an, to lim­it out­side in­flu­ence on their Mas­sachu­setts Sen­ate race. And it comes in a state that out­side groups have made a top tar­get in 2014 — col­lect­ively, they’ve already re­served $20 mil­lion worth of TV ads there, an enorm­ous sum for a state with a sparse pop­u­la­tion.

“This is noth­ing new; it has been done, it works,” Sul­li­van said in a con­fer­ence call with re­port­ers. “All it takes now to work in Alaska is to have Mark Be­gich’s sig­na­ture on it.”¦ This is one point on which we should see eye to eye.”

The Demo­crat hasn’t yet offered up a po­s­i­tion on the pledge. But the Re­pub­lic­an was less ready to an­swer wheth­er such out­side spend­ing should be al­lowed in oth­er states.

Asked by Na­tion­al Journ­al wheth­er Sul­li­van sup­por­ted the Su­preme Court’s 2010 Cit­izens United de­cision, which con­trib­uted to the rise of power­ful out­side groups such as Amer­ic­an Cross­roads and Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC, Sul­li­van de­murred, say­ing he very much sup­ports “strong free speech.” The pledge, he said, was not a ref­er­ence to Cit­izens United.

Sul­li­van failed to dir­ectly an­swer two fol­low-up ques­tions about Cit­izens United from loc­al me­dia in Alaska, one of which asked wheth­er all states shouldn’t have the priv­ilege of elec­tions free from out­side in­flu­ence.

“This is not about Cit­izen United, this is not about le­gis­la­tion pending or look­ing to be in­tro­duced in Con­gress,” Sul­li­van said. “This is about the way we think this race should be con­duc­ted in Alaska to give our cit­izens voice.”¦This is an un­pre­ced­en­ted sum of third-party spe­cial-in­terest money.”

In a fol­low-up call after the con­ver­sa­tion, cam­paign spokes­man Mike An­der­son gave the first af­firm­at­ive sup­port for the de­cision. “At the end of the day, Dan does sup­port Cit­izens United,” An­der­son said.

This is the first time Sul­li­van has voiced his opin­ion on the de­cision, but he wrote in a re­sponse to the As­so­ci­ated Press in June that “Sen. Be­gich has had more than five years to ad­dress the in­flu­ence of out­side groups in elec­tions” and still hadn’t ac­com­plished any­thing.

Sul­li­van is still in the midst of a three-way race for the Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­a­tion. He will take on Lt. Gov. Mead Tread­well and 2010 Sen­ate can­did­ate Joe Miller on Aug. 14.

Sul­li­van said Tread­well and Miller had not been asked to sign the pledge be­cause they hadn’t yet been hit by out­side ads.

Be­gich’s cam­paign fired back with a re­sponse that af­ter­noon cri­ti­ciz­ing Sul­li­van’s hes­it­a­tion on the ques­tion.

“Sul­li­van again tried to tell Alaskans one thing, but then quickly re­vealed the truth today — he sup­ports al­low­ing cor­por­a­tions to en­gage in un­lim­ited spend­ing in our elec­tions,” said Susanne Fleek-Green, cam­paign man­ager for Alaskans for Be­gich. “If Dan Sul­li­van makes it out of his com­pet­it­ive primary, it will be a stark con­trast between his put-cor­por­a­tions-first po­s­i­tion and Sen­at­or Be­gich’s sup­port for real cam­paign fin­ance re­form, in­clud­ing sup­port of a con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment throw­ing out Cit­izens United.

What We're Following See More »
TOOTHLESS?
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
34 minutes ago
THE LATEST
HAD SOUGHT INFO ON LOBBYISTS IN ADMINISTRATION
White House Snubs OGE’s Request for Info on Waivers
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."

Source:
NIKKI HALEY HEADING FOR ANKARA
Turkey Summons U.S. Ambassador
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
THOMAS JOINS COURT’S LIBERALS
Court Rules Against NC Voting Districts, Says They Were Racially Motivated
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."

Source:
UNANIMOUS DECISION
SCOTUS Rules Against Venue Shopping in Patent Cases
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login