You’ve heard academia referred to as a snake pit. You’ve heard tales of academic infighting, and maybe even read about the time earlier this year when one liberal-arts-school professor, who was accused of plotting to kill a colleague, sued the accuser for defamation. More often, faculty members’ political battles revolve around more mundanely nefarious things, such is how to oust their own dean.
Now imagine that two professors at one of said colleges are actually running for Congress against one another. It sounds like the plot of a bad reality show, but at Randolph-Macon College, a small liberal-arts college in Ashland, Va., that’s precisely the situation.
David Brat, who just ousted House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in what has been widely reviewed on the Internet as a shocking and historic Republican primary loss, is a tea-party-loving professor of economics who already has Washington talking fearfully about the coming populist revolution. On Rate My Professor, he has a 3.5 out of 5.0 rating for overall quality and a glowing chili pepper to signal a high level of physical attractiveness.
Particularly notable, however, is that even the students who gave him poor ratings seemed to be in awe of him. “Brat changes assignments all the time, but he’s so charming you forget to be mad at him,” said one student, after rating him “poor quality” with a frowny face. Another who rated him poorly seemed to be criticizing teaching as a profession: “Great guy, but almost too smart to teach.” Said another who gave him bad ratings, “He’s an amazing teacher, his classes are very interesting and he knows how to catch students’ attention.” Too bad no one taught that latter student how to use the website.
Brat’s Democratic opponent, Jack Trammell, is a professor of sociology who until Tuesday had been rated only twice on Rate My Professor since 2008 (fortunately he’s been rated three more times in the last 12 hours). Like Brat, he has a glowing chili pepper to signal physical attractiveness and earned a 4.2 for overall quality.
The campus is likely crawling with reporters already, but until they file their dispatches, we bloggers will have to make due with social media. Take for instance, Trammell’s colorful personal Twitter page and Brat’s recent musings on how Hitler’s rise could happen again. No word yet on how this will affect their syllabi, but it’s going to be a colorful semester at Randolph-Macon College.
What We're Following See More »
"It was obvious he wasn't prepared." “He only mentioned her email scandal once." "I think he took things a little too personal and missed a lot of opportunities to make very good debate points." That's just a smattering of the reactions of some elected Republicans to Donald Trump's debate performance.
The conventional wisdom is already emerging that Donald Trump opened last night's debate well, but that he faded badly down the stretch. And most viewers apparently witnessed it. "The early Nielsen data confirms that viewership stayed high the entire time. Contrary to some speculation, there was not a big drop-off after the first hour of the 98-minute debate." Final data is still being tallied, but "Monday's face-off may well have been the most-watched debate in American history. CNN and other cable news channels saw big increases over past election years. So did some of the broadcast networks."
As Congress continues to bicker on riders to a continuing resolution, federal agencies have started working with the Office of Management and Budget to prepare for a government shutdown, which will occur if no continuing resolution is passed by 11:59 p.m. on Friday night. The OMB held a call with agencies on Sept. 23, one that is required one week before a possible shutdown. The government last shut down for 16 days in 2013, and multiple shutdowns have been narrowly avoided since then. It is expected that Congress will reach a deal before the clock strikes midnight, but until it does, preparations will continue.