People Who Want Immigration Reform Say: Forget Eric Cantor, Just Look at Lindsey Graham

Two primaries allow you to draw whatever lessons best suit your agenda.

Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) during a markup session for the immigration reform legislation in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill May 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elahe Izadi
June 11, 2014, 10:22 a.m.

House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor’s shock­ing primary de­feat to a col­lege pro­fess­or who cas­ted Can­tor as a “pro-am­nesty” con­gress­man has left im­mig­ra­tion-re­form ad­voc­ates on the de­fense.

And so when you bring up Can­tor’s de­feat, they re­spond with: Yes, but what of Lind­sey Gra­ham?

The Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or, an au­thor of the up­per cham­ber’s com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion bill, is a pro­ponent of a path­way to cit­izen­ship. And he coas­ted through his South Car­o­lina primary Tues­day night, beat­ing back six tea-party chal­lengers.

“To some­how as­sume this was a ver­dict on im­mig­ra­tion re­form, I think some­how you’d have to jus­ti­fy Sen­at­or Gra­ham’s suc­cess,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Mc­Cain. “It’s a lot more com­plic­ated than just the is­sue of im­mig­ra­tion.”

Or just ask a Demo­crat. Top Demo­crat­ic lead­ers, such as Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, who said Re­pub­lic­ans “should fol­low the lead of Lind­sey Gra­ham.”

“He nev­er backed down, backed up. He kept go­ing for­ward on this is­sue. And South Car­o­lina is not known as a very pro­gress­ive state,” Re­id said, adding that Wash­ing­ton tends to “over­ana­lyze.”

In­deed, the out­comes of both races are ac­tu­ally due to a num­ber of factors, and to pin one’s loss or an­oth­er’s suc­cess solely on im­mig­ra­tion re­form would be an ex­er­cise in over­sim­pli­fic­a­tion.

“If you don’t want to do something, any ex­cuse will do,” said the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Demo­crat, Dick Durbin.

That doesn’t mean Can­tor’s loss won’t put the scare in the House Re­pub­lic­ans who are open to re­form but haven’t been push­ing for it this year. Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mario Diaz-Bal­art, an ad­voc­ate for re­form, said “per­cep­tion be­comes real­ity.”

“This clearly doesn’t help our cause “¦ it throws a wrench in­to it,” he said, later adding, “This is a ma­jor dis­rup­tion. This is a huge tsunami in this le­gis­lat­ive pro­cess that fur­ther com­plic­ates everything.”

To the left of the is­sue are im­mig­ra­tion-re­form ad­voc­ates who are frus­trated with the White House delay­ing ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion on de­port­a­tions. They are us­ing Can­tor’s de­feat to bol­ster their ar­gu­ment that there is no more time to delay.

“Eric Can­tor’s de­feat at the [hands of a tea-party ex­trem­ist proves] what many of us have been say­ing for quite some time: Im­mig­ra­tion re­form is dead in this Re­pub­lic­an Con­gress,” said, an on­line Latino ad­vocacy group. “We urge Pres­id­ent Obama to face the facts, stand up to the xeno­phobic and hate­ful forces in Amer­ica, and take ac­tion to stop de­port­a­tions im­me­di­ately. Any­thing less is un­ac­cept­able to Lati­nos across the coun­try.”

Demo­crat­ic Rep. Lu­is Gu­ti­er­rez, Con­gress’s most vo­cal pro­ponent of strong ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion on de­port­a­tions, said on the House floor Wed­nes­day that it’s still on House Re­pub­lic­ans to move on im­mig­ra­tion re­form — but that the most real­ist­ic win­dow for it to hap­pen is still between now and Ju­ly 4, primary or not. And ab­sent le­gis­la­tion, the White House will move, Gu­ti­er­rez said.

“Im­mig­ra­tion re­form is not dead. It might just be mov­ing to the White House for ac­tion if none comes from this House,” Gu­ti­er­rez said.

Either way you cut it, the stakes are high for the GOP, par­tic­u­larly come 2016: “If we don’t en­act im­mig­ra­tion re­form, it’d be very dif­fi­cult to win a na­tion­al elec­tion,” Mc­Cain said.

Po­ten­tial 2016 pres­id­en­tial con­tenders Sens. Marco Ru­bio and Rand Paul aren’t in a rush to draw big les­sons from Can­tor’s de­feat. Ru­bio — who said Can­tor’s op­pon­ent Dav­id Brat sounds “very im­press­ive. He ac­tu­ally has an agenda with clear ideas” — was an au­thor of the Sen­ate’s com­pre­hens­ive bill (he con­cedes that he and Brat dif­fer on how they “talk” about that is­sue).

“Im­mig­ra­tion has nev­er been an is­sue that is a polit­ic­ally pop­u­lar one,” Ru­bio said. “There’s le­git­im­ate con­cerns about rule of law. I think those have only be ex­acer­bated by this ad­min­is­tra­tion’s un­will­ing­ness to en­force the law. I don’t know about the oth­ers, I knew that go­ing in. I just le­git­im­ately feel this is an is­sue that’s hurt­ing Amer­ica and needs to be ad­dressed.”

Paul said he “didn’t fol­low the race closely enough to say it’s about one is­sue or not.” But he did say that there is a path to mak­ing im­mig­ra­tion re­form hap­pen.

“If you put your head in the sand and say you don’t want any­thing done, then you’re ac­know­ledging you don’t want any­thing done,” Paul said. “El­ev­en mil­lion people have come over here il­leg­ally over the past couple dec­ades. If you do noth­ing an­oth­er 11 mil­lion come, so do­ing noth­ing really is not a great an­swer.”

As to what les­sons to draw from the Can­tor loss and the Gra­ham vic­tory, one re­form ad­voc­ate (and Can­tor sup­port­er) say he’s not ready to make that de­term­in­a­tion: “I don’t know what mes­sage this sends, what mes­sage Lind­sey Gra­ham’s vic­tory sends. It’s in­ter­est­ing, we po­ten­tially have con­flict­ing mes­sages here,” Diaz-Bal­art said.

Michael Catalini contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Bill Murray Crashes White House Briefing Room
4 hours ago

In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.

CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
7 hours ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
7 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
9 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
9 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.