John Boehner’s Fond Farewell to Eric Cantor

National Journal
Marina Koren
June 11, 2014, 1:44 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are really sad to see House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor go.

“He’s a be­loved per­son,” said one. “My heart is broken,” said an­oth­er. Speak­er John Boehner ap­par­ently even got choked up as he de­livered a trib­ute to Can­tor dur­ing a spe­cial meet­ing Wed­nes­day with the Re­pub­lic­an caucus, be­fore Can­tor an­nounced to the pub­lic that he will step down as ma­jor­ity lead­er fol­low­ing his Tues­day primary loss.

Here’s how Boehner bid his col­league farewell from lead­er­ship, ac­cord­ing to ex­cerpts of his pre­pared re­marks:

This is a speech I nev­er ex­pec­ted to give. I want to start by of­fer­ing a heart­felt thanks to Eric and his staff for their ser­vice to our con­fer­ence, our in­sti­tu­tion and our coun­try.

We’ve been through a lot to­geth­er. When I was elec­ted ma­jor­ity lead­er eight and a half years ago, Eric was there, as the chief deputy whip. He’s al­ways been there. There’s no one who works harder, or puts more thought, in­to ad­van­cing our prin­ciples and the solu­tions we want to en­act for the Amer­ic­an people.

Win­ston Churchill once fam­ously said: “Suc­cess is not fi­nal, fail­ure is not fatal: it is the cour­age to con­tin­ue that counts.” As one who suffered a tough de­feat my­self in 1998, I can tell you there’s plenty of wis­dom in that state­ment.

Eric, we sa­lute you, and we thank you, and your amaz­ing staff as well. We’re los­ing a lead­er, but you’ll nev­er stop be­ing our col­league and our friend.

This is the time for unity; the time for fo­cus — fo­cus on the thing we all know to be true: the fail­ure of Barack Obama’s policies and our ob­lig­a­tion to show the Amer­ic­an people we of­fer them not just a vi­able al­tern­at­ive, but a bet­ter fu­ture.

For oth­er House Re­pub­lic­ans, however, this is the time to start hust­ling: The race for the next ma­jor­ity lead­er has already be­gun.

What We're Following See More »
“PROFOUNDLY DANGEROUS”
Clinton Rips Into Trump
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.

SEVEN-POINT LEAD IN A FOUR-WAY
Quinnipiac Has Clinton Over 50%
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.

Source:
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
MIGHT STILL ACCEPT FOREIGN AND CORPORATE MONEY
Chelsea to Stay on Board of Clinton Foundation
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."

Source:
INTERCEPT IN MIDDLE EAST
Navy Calls Iranian Ships’ Actions Dangerous, Unprofessional
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.

Source:
×