Yes, Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s primary loss was a huge upset, a shocker, literally historic in nature. And Cantor must be, to say the very least, down in the dumps about it. His colleagues have been speaking in language of death and mourning. House Speaker John Boehner said Tuesday night that his “thoughts are with him and Diana and their kids tonight.”
But once everything settles and Cantor figures out what exactly he wants to do after his term in Congress ends, one option remains exceedingly attractive and absurdly lucrative: K Street. If he chooses that route, he’d be following in the footsteps of many other high-profile congressmen who have traded legislation for lobbying.
It’s a very common path. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, 31 representatives out of 97 who left after the 112th Congress are now employed in lobbying or are clients of lobbying firms. (See a list of representatives from the 112th Congress now on K Street here.) Depending on the representatives’ tenure and committee appointments, salaries can reach the millions. The Hill recently reported that House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp could fetch $1 million on K Street after he leaves Congress.
“So the question is, how rich does Eric Cantor want to be?”
Cantor could be the most powerful member of Congress out of a job next year, meaning he would command a very high salary.
Career opportunities outside of K Street can also be very lucrative for former members of Congress. Jim DeMint was one of the poorest senators in 2010, worth only around $40,000. Now, as the president of the conservative Heritage Foundation, he likely makes more than $1 million a year. Chris Dodd, former Senate Banking Committee chairman and presidential candidate, makes $2.4 million as CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America.
Former Rep. Jo Ann Emerson of Missouri, who served on the House Appropriations Committee, resigned from Congress in January 2013 to head up the National Rural Electric Cooperative. Although not technically a lobbyist, her group does lobby, and her predecessor (also a former congressman) earned more than $1.7 million in 2011.
But Cantor could potentially eclipse all of them. One former House GOP leadership aide who is now on K Street puts it this way: He’d demand a “generously high” six- to low-seven-figure salary.
“Cantor has the freshest and strongest relationships with both leadership and rank-and-file members than any lobbyist downtown,” the source adds. “He’s also hugely admired and respected by Wall Street.”
Indeed. His top three campaign contributors for the 2013-14 cycle are from huge financial firms: the Blackstone Group, Scoggin Capital Management, and Goldman Sachs. In all, the securities and investment industry gave him $2.8 million over the course of his 15-year congressional career. In turn, he’s defended Wall Street interests in Congress. During the debt-ceiling showdown of 2011, Cantor fought the White House on changes to the tax code that would cost the financial-services industry $20 billion over 10 years. His wife, Diana, has close ties to Wall Street as well, having worked at Goldman Sachs as a vice president.
Those connections also mean he’ll be a trusted figure that industry executives would want.
One other factor that will play into how much Cantor could command on K Street: his remaining relationships on Capitol Hill. Recall that Boehner and Cantor didn’t always have the warmest of relationships, so if Boehner stays on as speaker, it’s an open question how much Boehner will restrict Cantor’s access on the Hill.
But, as another former senior Republican Hill aide with K Street experience said, Cantor’s relationships with committee chairmen, and how much he’s helped them get their posts, will make him more valuable.
“The trick with K Street, though, is that sometimes all it takes is one major relationship to make a lot of money. For instance, there are plenty lobbyists who easily make seven digits just because they have one relationship with one committee chair,” the GOP source said. “So the question is, how rich does Eric Cantor want to be?”
Future earning potential aside, Cantor is already independently wealthy. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Cantor’s net worth is between $2.1 million and $7.7 million. His wife has most recently served as director at Domino’s Pizza. According to National Journal‘s Shane Goldmacher, as of June 2013, the Cantors earned more than $3 million in Domino’s stock and income. In 2013, Diana Cantor made $231,444 in compensation at Domino’s, on top of $371,752 she made from work at Revlon, the Universal Corporation, and Media General.
As for the majority leader, he said any plans beyond Congress are “between my wife and me and I will be looking to see how I can best serve, how I can best be a part of what we really have been about here with the agenda called, an America that works.”
If Cantor does go to K Street, he would be no different from many, many other members of Congress. That’s the expected job trajectory. It’s just that Tuesday night’s loss expedited his opportunity to cash out.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."