Eric Cantor’s Loss Could Be the Best Thing That’s Happened to Him

OK, seriously though, he stands to make a lot of money.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) speaks to the media during a news conference on Capitol Hill, May 20, 2014 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Brian Resnick and Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick and Elahe Izadi
June 11, 2014, 5:28 p.m.

Yes, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor’s primary loss was a huge up­set, a shock­er, lit­er­ally his­tor­ic in nature. And Can­tor must be, to say the very least, down in the dumps about it. His col­leagues have been speak­ing in lan­guage of death and mourn­ing. House Speak­er John Boehner said Tues­day night that his “thoughts are with him and Di­ana and their kids to­night.”

But once everything settles and Can­tor fig­ures out what ex­actly he wants to do after his term in Con­gress ends, one op­tion re­mains ex­ceed­ingly at­tract­ive and ab­surdly luc­rat­ive: K Street. If he chooses that route, he’d be fol­low­ing in the foot­steps of many oth­er high-pro­file con­gress­men who have traded le­gis­la­tion for lob­by­ing.

It’s a very com­mon path. Ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics, 31 rep­res­ent­at­ives out of 97 who left after the 112th Con­gress are now em­ployed in lob­by­ing or are cli­ents of lob­by­ing firms. (See a list of rep­res­ent­at­ives from the 112th Con­gress now on K Street here.) De­pend­ing on the rep­res­ent­at­ives’ ten­ure and com­mit­tee ap­point­ments, salar­ies can reach the mil­lions. The Hill re­cently re­por­ted that House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dave Camp could fetch $1 mil­lion on K Street after he leaves Con­gress.

“So the ques­tion is, how rich does Eric Can­tor want to be?”

Can­tor could be the most power­ful mem­ber of Con­gress out of a job next year, mean­ing he would com­mand a very high salary.

Un­der cur­rent law, rep­res­ent­at­ives have to wait a year be­fore be­ing able to lobby Con­gress (though there are loop­holes).

Ca­reer op­por­tun­it­ies out­side of K Street can also be very luc­rat­ive for former mem­bers of Con­gress. Jim De­Mint was one of the poorest sen­at­ors in 2010, worth only around $40,000. Now, as the pres­id­ent of the con­ser­vat­ive Her­it­age Found­a­tion, he likely makes more than $1 mil­lion a year. Chris Dodd, former Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee chair­man and pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate, makes $2.4 mil­lion as CEO of the Mo­tion Pic­ture As­so­ci­ation of Amer­ica.

Former Rep. Jo Ann Emer­son of Mis­souri, who served on the House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee, resigned from Con­gress in Janu­ary 2013 to head up the Na­tion­al Rur­al Elec­tric Co­oper­at­ive. Al­though not tech­nic­ally a lob­by­ist, her group does lobby, and her pre­de­cessor (also a former con­gress­man) earned more than $1.7 mil­lion in 2011.

But Can­tor could po­ten­tially ec­lipse all of them. One former House GOP lead­er­ship aide who is now on K Street puts it this way: He’d de­mand a “gen­er­ously high” six- to low-sev­en-fig­ure salary.

“Can­tor has the freshest and strongest re­la­tion­ships with both lead­er­ship and rank-and-file mem­bers than any lob­by­ist down­town,” the source adds. “He’s also hugely ad­mired and re­spec­ted by Wall Street.”

In­deed. His top three cam­paign con­trib­ut­ors for the 2013-14 cycle are from huge fin­an­cial firms: the Black­stone Group, Scog­gin Cap­it­al Man­age­ment, and Gold­man Sachs. In all, the se­cur­it­ies and in­vest­ment in­dustry gave him $2.8 mil­lion over the course of his 15-year con­gres­sion­al ca­reer. In turn, he’s de­fen­ded Wall Street in­terests in Con­gress. Dur­ing the debt-ceil­ing show­down of 2011, Can­tor fought the White House on changes to the tax code that would cost the fin­an­cial-ser­vices in­dustry $20 bil­lion over 10 years. His wife, Di­ana, has close ties to Wall Street as well, hav­ing worked at Gold­man Sachs as a vice pres­id­ent.

Those con­nec­tions also mean he’ll be a trus­ted fig­ure that in­dustry ex­ec­ut­ives would want.

One oth­er factor that will play in­to how much Can­tor could com­mand on K Street: his re­main­ing re­la­tion­ships on Cap­it­ol Hill. Re­call that Boehner and Can­tor didn’t al­ways have the warmest of re­la­tion­ships, so if Boehner stays on as speak­er, it’s an open ques­tion how much Boehner will re­strict Can­tor’s ac­cess on the Hill.

But, as an­oth­er former seni­or Re­pub­lic­an Hill aide with K Street ex­per­i­ence said, Can­tor’s re­la­tion­ships with com­mit­tee chair­men, and how much he’s helped them get their posts, will make him more valu­able.

“The trick with K Street, though, is that some­times all it takes is one ma­jor re­la­tion­ship to make a lot of money. For in­stance, there are plenty lob­by­ists who eas­ily make sev­en di­gits just be­cause they have one re­la­tion­ship with one com­mit­tee chair,” the GOP source said. “So the ques­tion is, how rich does Eric Can­tor want to be?”

Fu­ture earn­ing po­ten­tial aside, Can­tor is already in­de­pend­ently wealthy. Ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics, Can­tor’s net worth is between $2.1 mil­lion and $7.7 mil­lion. His wife has most re­cently served as dir­ect­or at Dom­ino’s Pizza. Ac­cord­ing to Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Shane Gold­mach­er, as of June 2013, the Can­tors earned more than $3 mil­lion in Dom­ino’s stock and in­come. In 2013, Di­ana Can­tor made $231,444 in com­pens­a­tion at Dom­ino’s, on top of $371,752 she made from work at Re­vlon, the Uni­ver­sal Cor­por­a­tion, and Me­dia Gen­er­al.

As for the ma­jor­ity lead­er, he said any plans bey­ond Con­gress are “between my wife and me and I will be look­ing to see how I can best serve, how I can best be a part of what we really have been about here with the agenda called, an Amer­ica that works.”

If Can­tor does go to K Street, he would be no dif­fer­ent from many, many oth­er mem­bers of Con­gress. That’s the ex­pec­ted job tra­ject­ory. It’s just that Tues­day night’s loss ex­ped­ited his op­por­tun­ity to cash out.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
9 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×