Rep. Steve Scalise is close to clinching enough support to sew up the race for majority whip, allies of the Louisiana Republican said Thursday, aggressively dismissing the impact of Rep. Marlin Stuzman’s entrance into the race hours earlier.
Stutzman, a third-term lawmaker from Indiana, is popular in the conference and especially well-liked by the young conservatives who comprised the classes of 2010 and 2012. He also enjoys good relations with powerful conservative groups outside the Capitol.
Scalise was thought to be the favorite going head-to-head with Chief Deputy Whip Peter Roskam, who also has declared for the race. But Stutzman’s sudden candidacy complicates the math for Scalise. Stutzman has built a solid reputation in conservative circles, and could be a more attractive option to the younger Republican Study Commiitee members than Scalise, whose leadership of the group — some call it a “debate society” — has drawn grumbles from some members looking for a more assertive approach.
Stutzman, according to a Republican source, also will highlight this year’s vote on a flood insurance — a bill that Scalise advocated for his Bayou constituents, but many conservatives opposed. Scalise, for his part, made no apologies for the flood insurance push. And his friends pushed back Thursday on the “debate society” argument, pointing out that Scalise’s RSC has consistently moved legislation to the floor through regular order.
It’s not clear that Stutzman can win — odds are, he probably can’t — but if he successfully splinters the conservative vote, Roskam could claim the whip’s office with a coalition of moderates and establishment-friendly conservatives.
Indeed, a Roskam aide disputed that Scalise is close to clinching the post. The winner must grab the backing of at least a majority of the 233 House Republicans who will show up to vote in closed-door balloting set for Thursday. “The numbers being floated out there are low,” said Stephanie Kittredge of the amount of support she says is lining up behind her own boss. She declined to give a number.
Kittredge acknowledged that the argument made by Scalise forces that “red states” need to be representated on the House leadership team may be persuasive. But she argued that it was not relevant for this job: “The whip’s job is to round up and count votes — and not just southern votes.”
Scalise and his team are focused on Stutzmam; they are already hitting him hard. One ally of the current RSC chairman pointed out that Stutzman, who was thought to be interested in the job back in 2012, didn’t show up for his interview with the committee’s founding members.
“Steve is close to hitting the magic number of votes he’ll need,” the source said, adding that Scalise hopes to have the race wrapped up by Thursday evening when lawmakers leave town for the weekend.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."