President Obama took aim Saturday at the trend of Republicans citing their absence of scientific credentials as a reason to avoid questions about global warming.
Obama even compared them unfavorably to the many other Republicans who reject the overwhelming verdict of scientists that human-induced climate change is real.
“Today’s Congress … is full of folks who stubbornly and automatically reject the scientific evidence about climate change. They’ll tell you it is a hoax, or a fad,” Obama said at a commencement address at the University of California (Irvine).
“Now, their view may be wrong — and a fairly serious threat to everybody’s future — but at least they have the brass to say what they actually think. There are some who also duck the question. They say — when they’re asked about climate change, they say, ‘Hey, look, I’m not a scientist.’ And I’ll translate that for you. What that really means is, ‘I know that man-made climate change really is happening, but if I admit it, I’ll be run out of town by a radical fringe that thinks climate science is a liberal plot, so I’m not going to admit it,’” Obama said.
Obama didn’t name-check any specific lawmakers. But his comments arrive two weeks after House Speaker John Boehner deflected a question about whether climate change is a problem by saying, “Listen, I’m not qualified to debate the science over climate change.” Boehner then alleged that EPA rules to curb power plants’ carbon emissions would hurt the economy.
Boehner’s comment arrived a couple days after GOP Florida Gov. Rick Scott said, “I’m not a scientist” in deflecting a question about whether human-induced climate change is real.
The “not a scientist” line isn’t entirely new, however. Sen. Marco Rubio, who has recently spoken a fair amount about his climate skepticism, used it as far back as 2009, before he was elected.
Obama, in his speech Saturday, also announced the National Disaster Resilience Competition.
Under the roughly $1 billion program, communities that have been hit with natural disasters can compete for money to “help them rebuild and increase their resilience to future disasters,” according to a White House summary.
The money will be made available through the Housing and Urban Development Department using existing funds.
The White House said that $820 million will be available for states and local governments that were struck by a “presidentially declared major disaster” in 2011, 2012, or 2013. States specifically affected by Hurricane Sandy can compete for a separate pot of around $180 million to address “critical housing needs,” the White House said.
- 1 Views of Homosexuality Differ Greatly by Region
- 2 Congress Passed a Cell-Phone Unlocking Bill. But It Won’t Do Much.
- 3 The Fight for a Smaller, Stronger Republican Study Committee
- 4 Wednesday Q+A with Ann Selzer
- 5 Smart Ideas: The Debate as a Microcosm of 2016, the Demise of North Korea, and the Libertarian Party’s Ceiling
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.