Two weeks ago, President Obama warned Russian President Vladimir Putin that Russia would face “additional costs” if it didn’t stop fanning the separatist fire in eastern Ukraine.
Then on Friday, Russia sent tanks, rocket launchers, and other weapons to separatists in eastern Ukraine, according to the State Department. The day after, Russian-backed militants shot down a Ukrainian military plane, killing the 49 people aboard — the deadliest event since unrest began February.
And on Monday, Russia cut off its gas supply to Ukraine.
The Ukraine crisis has quickly escalated in a matter of days — yet again. But whether the recent events are enough for more U.S. action against Russian provocation in the coming weeks remains unclear.
A National Security Council spokeswoman said Monday that the U.S. continues to urge Russia to pull its support from separatist groups and stop the flow of arms across the border. For now, it looks as if the Obama administration is sticking to its usual tactic in this crisis — playing the wait-and-see game as Putin makes promises to disengage from the region.
“The mere fact that some of the Russian soldiers have moved back from the border and that Russia is now destabilizing Ukraine through surrogates, rather than overtly and explicitly, does not mean that we can afford three months, or four months, or six months, of continued violence and conflict in eastern Ukraine,” Obama said during the G-7 summit at the beginning of this month.
But talk of sanctions is especially unlikely to come in the immediate weeks. All eyes are on the deteriorating situation in Iraq right now, a reality that buys Russia time. With the administration distracted by events in the Middle East, Putin may be thinking he has additional wiggle room for more meddling in Ukraine.
- 1 Views of Homosexuality Differ Greatly by Region
- 2 Congress Passed a Cell-Phone Unlocking Bill. But It Won’t Do Much.
- 3 The Fight for a Smaller, Stronger Republican Study Committee
- 4 Wednesday Q+A with Ann Selzer
- 5 Smart Ideas: The Debate as a Microcosm of 2016, the Demise of North Korea, and the Libertarian Party’s Ceiling
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.