The Right to Lie in Campaigns Is Safe, for Now.

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a First Amendment case over “false” ads can continue.

The United States Supreme Court announced a ruling in the case Hall v. Florida, finding that the state had adopted too rigid a cutoff in deciding who is eligible to be spared the death penalty because of intellectual disabilities, May 27, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sam Baker
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sam Baker
June 16, 2014, 7:11 a.m.

Add an­oth­er wrinkle to the in­san­ity that is the 2014 midterms: Courts will still be de­cid­ing wheth­er states have the right to re­strict “false” cam­paign ads.

The Su­preme Court on Monday ducked the biggest ques­tions in a po­ten­tially sig­ni­fic­ant First Amend­ment case about polit­ic­al at­tack ads and how state gov­ern­ments can reg­u­late them. But it said those is­sues should con­tin­ue to play out in lower courts.

This all star­ted with an anti-Obama­care bill­board in 2010. The Susan B. An­thony List, an anti-abor­tion-rights group, wanted to put up a bill­board at­tack­ing then-Rep. Steve Driehaus over his vote for the Af­ford­able Care Act.  “Shame on Steve Driehaus! Driehaus voted FOR tax­pay­er-fun­ded abor­tion,” the bill­board read.

Driehaus said the at­tack was false, and his state — Ohio — bans false ads.

SBA List nev­er put up the bill­board in ques­tion, but it chal­lenged the Ohio law as un­con­sti­tu­tion­al. State gov­ern­ments have no busi­ness de­cid­ing what can be said in a polit­ic­al cam­paign, or serving as the ar­bit­ers of what’s true or false, SBA List ar­gued.

A fed­er­al ap­peals court tossed out SBA List’s suit on pro­ced­ur­al grounds. The Su­preme Court re­versed that de­cision in a un­an­im­ous rul­ing Monday, say­ing the suit can pro­ceed.

Fif­teen states have laws sim­il­ar to Ohio’s, all of which could hang in the bal­ance as courts con­tin­ue to ques­tion wheth­er such laws are con­sti­tu­tion­al.

In 2010, Driehaus filed a com­plaint with Ohio’s elec­tion com­mis­sion and also pres­sured the bill­board own­er not to ac­cept SBA List’s ad. Be­cause the ad nev­er went up, the elec­tion com­mis­sion nev­er ruled. And that means SBA List’s at­tack was nev­er ac­tu­ally deemed true or false.

So, to chal­lenge Ohio’s law, SBA List had to ar­gue that the whole mess with Driehaus was chilling its fu­ture speech — that it wants to run sim­il­ar ads in the fu­ture and could face en­force­ment from Ohio’s ban on “false” at­tacks. And of course, SBA List be­lieves its at­tack is en­tirely true, cit­ing the struc­ture of the health care law’s in­sur­ance sub­sidies, which calls in­to ques­tion wheth­er an at­tack like this one could ever be ruled defin­it­ively true or false.

The lower court said SBA List’s ar­gu­ment was too hy­po­thet­ic­al — without an ac­tu­al rul­ing from the elec­tion com­mis­sion, SBA List hadn’t been in­jured, the court said. And if it hadn’t been in­jured, it couldn’t sue.

The Su­preme Court re­jec­ted that reas­on­ing. Justice Clar­ence Thomas, who wrote the un­an­im­ous opin­ion, cited past cases in which the Court al­lowed “pre-en­force­ment” chal­lenges.

When a state law re­stricts activ­ity pro­tec­ted by the Con­sti­tu­tion, the Court has said that the threat of pro­sec­u­tion is enough of an in­jury to sup­port a law­suit, Thomas wrote.

What We're Following See More »
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

DETAILS ARE CLASSIFIED
Brennan Saw Russia Intelligence “Worthy” of Investigation
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

At an open hearing of the House Intelligence Committee, former CIA chief John Brennan said he saw information on Trump-Russia contacts that were worth a further look. "Having been involved in many counterintelligence cases in the past, I know what the Russians do. They try to suborn individuals," Brennan said. "And they try to get individuals, including U.S. persons, to act on their behalf, whether wittingly or unwittingly. And I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons, and so therefore by the time I left office ... I had unresolved questions in my mind."

Source:
STAFF HAS COMPILED A SHORT LIST
Trump Enlisting Help of Outside Counsel
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump is moving rapidly toward assembling outside counsel to help him navigate the investigations into his campaign and Russian interference in last year’s election, and in recent days he and his advisers have privately courted several prominent attorneys to join the effort. By Monday, a list of finalists for the legal team had emerged, according to four people briefed on the discussions."

Source:
MADE REQUESTS TO COATS, ROGERS
Trump Asked Intel Chiefs to Push Back Against FBI Probe
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump asked two of the nation’s top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government, according to current and former officials. Trump made separate appeals to the director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, and to Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, urging them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion during the 2016 election."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login