Should Climate Change Come With a Warning Label?

An enormous iceberg (R) breaks off the Knox Coast in the Australian Antarctic Territory on January 11, 2008. Australia's CSIRO's atmospheric research unit has found the world is warming faster than predicted by the United Nations' top climate change body, with harmful emissions exceeding worst-case estimates. 
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
June 17, 2014, 9:39 a.m.

Air pol­lu­tion could soon come with a warn­ing la­bel.

At least if you live in Berke­ley, Cal­if. The city is weigh­ing a pro­pos­al that re­quires gas-sta­tion own­ers to at­tach air-pol­lu­tion warn­ing la­bels to gas pumps. The la­bels alert cus­tom­ers that gas­ol­ine con­sump­tion re­leases car­bon di­ox­ide, which in turn con­trib­utes to cli­mate change.

And they don’t mince words. “GLOB­AL WARM­ING ALERT!” a mock-up of the la­bels screams in all cap­it­al let­ters.

The pro­posed or­din­ance is the brainchild of the San Fran­cisco Bay Area chapter of grass­roots en­vir­on­ment­al or­gan­iz­a­tion 350.org. It might seem far fetched to some, but it’s gain­ing trac­tion in a city with a pen­chant for pro­gress­ive polit­ics.

“We already re­quire ci­gar­ette packs to in­clude warn­ing la­bels,” Mat­thew Lewis, the co-chair of the Chan­cel­lor’s Ad­vis­ory Com­mit­tee on Sus­tain­ab­il­ity at Berke­ley told the Daily Cali­for­ni­an earli­er this week. “Re­quir­ing la­bels at gas pumps would sim­il­arly keep the harm of burn­ing gas­ol­ine fresh in people’s minds.”

Berke­ley’s Com­munity En­vir­on­ment­al Ad­vis­ory Com­mis­sion ap­proved the plan Thursday. The pro­pos­al now awaits a City Coun­cil vote, which is ex­pec­ted to take place in the next few weeks.

Of course, not every­one is thrilled.

The West­ern States Pet­ro­leum As­so­ci­ation — a trade or­gan­iz­a­tion for pet­ro­leum pro­du­cers and re­finers — had harsh words for the pro­pos­al.

In a let­ter sent to the com­mis­sion last week, as­so­ci­ation pres­id­ent Cath­er­ine Re­he­is-Boyd said the plan would vi­ol­ate free speech by for­cing gas-sta­tion own­ers to af­fix the la­bels to their prop­erty. 

“This is the type of forced speech that the United States Su­preme Court has ruled is ab­so­lutely un­con­sti­tu­tion­al,” Re­he­is-Boyd wrote.

What We're Following See More »
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
12 minutes ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
36 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
38 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
56 minutes ago
THE LATEST
$1.6 BILLION SET ASIDE FOR WALL
House Freedom Caucus Chair: Shutdown Over Wall Funding Unlikely
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login