Obama’s Coded Climate Politics

Did President Obama blow the dog whistle for fossil-fuel-divestment activists?

National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
June 17, 2014, 10:02 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama’s cli­mate speech Sat­urday got plenty of press for its lengthy as­sault on glob­al-warm­ing deni­al. But what ex­cited an ag­gress­ive wing of the cli­mate move­ment were just a few cryptic words else­where in the com­mence­ment ad­dress at the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia (Irvine):

“You need to in­vest in what helps, and di­vest from what harms.”

Act­iv­ists push­ing uni­versit­ies and oth­er in­sti­tu­tions to dump their fin­an­cial hold­ings in coal and oil-and-gas com­pan­ies be­lieve they heard an un­mis­tak­able White House en­dorse­ment. “People are thrilled about it,” Jam­ie Henn of 350.org, one of the groups lead­ing the di­vest­ment move­ment, said of Obama’s com­ments Sat­urday.

“Stu­dents will be tak­ing the pres­id­ent’s mes­sage to their col­lege pres­id­ents and boards of trust­ees,” he said of the fossil-fuel-di­vest­ment cam­paign, which also in­cludes the En­ergy Ac­tion Co­ali­tion, the Re­spons­ible En­dow­ments Co­ali­tion, the Si­erra Stu­dent Co­ali­tion, and groups on spe­cif­ic cam­puses. The founder of 350.org, Bill McK­ib­ben, a high-pro­file cli­mate act­iv­ist, has been a ma­jor di­vest­ment ad­voc­ate.

It’s Obama’s second ap­par­ent nod to the idea. Dur­ing a Geor­getown Uni­versity speech rolling out his second-term cli­mate plan last June, Obama was even briefer, say­ing “In­vest. Di­vest.”

The “in­vest” part of Obama’s speeches is un­re­mark­able. Obama’s cli­mate and en­ergy speeches are of­ten loaded with ad­vocacy of fed­er­al sup­port for green-en­ergy de­vel­op­ment.

If Obama’s en­dors­ing the fossil-fuel-di­vest­ment move­ment, however, it’s a note­worthy stance from a White House that has ap­plauded boom­ing U.S. oil-and-gas pro­duc­tion that’s un­der­taken by some of the very same com­pan­ies that act­iv­ists tar­get in their cam­paign.

En­dors­ing the cam­paign, which draws in­spir­a­tion from the 1970s and 1980s move­ment ur­ging di­vest­ment from apartheid South Africa, would also be a re­turn to Obama’s earli­est polit­ic­al roots.

In re­marks in South Africa last year when the now-de­ceased Nel­son Man­dela was gravely ill, Obama re­called that his first speech, in 1981, was as an Oc­ci­dent­al Col­lege stu­dent at a rally de­mand­ing the school’s di­vest­ment from the apartheid re­gime.

But were Obama’s brief “di­vest” com­ments Sat­urday really a dog whistle for the fossil-fuel-di­vest­ment crowd? The White House won’t say what, ex­actly, Obama meant on Sat­urday.

In an email ex­change Monday morn­ing, White House spokes­man Matt Lehrich de­clined to elab­or­ate on the com­ment. “I don’t have a pars­ing of the state­ment for you,” he said.

Obama’s latest com­ment drew at­tack from the right Monday af­ter­noon, when Stan­ley Kur­tz wrote on the con­ser­vat­ive Na­tion­al Re­view magazine’s web­site that Obama had “de­clared war” on the na­tion’s con­ven­tion­al en­ergy in­dustry.

Kur­tz urged the press to “force Obama in­to the open” by push­ing the White House to ex­pand on the re­marks, and he sim­il­arly called on Cap­it­ol Hill Re­pub­lic­ans to press for cla­ri­fic­a­tion.

Act­iv­ists, however, already see a clear sig­nal of sup­port for their cam­paign, which gen­er­ally tar­gets in­vest­ment by pen­sion funds, uni­versit­ies, found­a­tions, and oth­ers in the 200 largest fossil-fuel com­pan­ies.

The di­vest­ment cam­paign in re­cent years has won vari­ous levels of di­vest­ment com­mit­ments — or at least re­com­mend­a­tions to in­vest­ment man­agers — from about two-dozen cit­ies, roughy a dozen high­er-edu­ca­tion in­sti­tu­tions, and oth­ers.

The highest-pro­file uni­versity has been Stan­ford, which in May said it would no longer in­vest in coal-min­ing com­pan­ies.

Henn said Obama’s re­marks will provide the move­ment with mo­mentum to pres­sure oth­er in­sti­tu­tions.

“I think stu­dents will see that as a clear sign that the [Obama] ad­min­is­tra­tion is on their side in terms of chal­len­ging their uni­versit­ies to take this step,” said Henn, one of the cofounders of 350.org.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×