Making a Move to Counter Unemployment and Boost Social Mobility

In the long run, unemployed Americans moving to better labor markets could also save the federal government serious money.

National Journal
Nancy Cook
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Nancy Cook
June 18, 2014, 4 p.m.

The solu­tion to two of the coun­try’s most press­ing eco­nom­ic woes may come down to a very simple idea: rent­ing a bunch of mov­ing vans. Those vans could help re­lo­cate some of the more than 3 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans who have been out of work for more than six months to states with re­l­at­ively low un­em­ploy­ment rates, such as Texas and North Dakota. Or the vans could trans­port en­tire fam­il­ies to places where low-in­come kids his­tor­ic­ally have a bet­ter chance of mov­ing up the in­come lad­der as they age.

The concept of en­cour­aging un­em­ployed work­ers to move en­joys bi­par­tis­an sup­port. Back in Feb­ru­ary, a tea-party Re­pub­lic­an from South Car­o­lina and a Cali­for­nia Demo­crat in­tro­duced a House bill to give the long-term un­em­ployed vouch­ers worth up to $10,000 to move at least 60 miles away from home for ser­i­ous job of­fers. The main con­di­tion? The new loc­a­tion would need to have an un­em­ploy­ment rate much lower than the area the per­son left.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, a mem­ber of the Sen­ate GOP lead­er­ship, sup­ports a sim­il­ar idea. He wants the Labor De­part­ment to award low-in­terest re­lo­ca­tion loans to the long-term un­em­ployed. “There is a bar­ri­er be­cause people who are un­em­ployed don’t have the re­sources to be able to re­lo­cate, and this is something that would al­low them to do that,” Thune said in Janu­ary dur­ing a press call.

(Mike Mc­Quade)Giv­ing long-term un­em­ployed work­ers sub­sidies to move is, in part, the brainchild of con­ser­vat­ive eco­nom­ist Mi­chael Strain of the Amer­ic­an En­ter­prise In­sti­tute. “A lot of the long-term un­em­ployed are in really bad shape. They could use some help, be­cause the policies we have aren’t work­ing,” Strain says. “It’s a threat to the ef­fi­ciency of the labor mar­ket when the work­ers live one place and good jobs are else­where.”

A 2010 pa­per from the Hamilton Pro­ject at Brook­ings es­tim­ates that re­lo­ca­tion sub­sidies would cost the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment less than $1 bil­lion a year and would res­ult in as many as 62,000 matches between work­ers and new jobs. (In the long run, un­em­ployed Amer­ic­ans mov­ing to bet­ter labor mar­kets could also save the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment ser­i­ous money on pro­grams such as food stamps, Medi­caid, and state-sponsored chil­dren’s health in­sur­ance.)

Mov­ing may help those just start­ing out their lives, too. Two prom­in­ent Har­vard eco­nom­ists, Raj Chetty and Nath­aniel Hendren, are work­ing on a study, tent­at­ively due out this later this year, that will look at the value of re­lo­cat­ing to a dif­fer­ent area as a way of in­creas­ing so­cial mo­bil­ity for kids. Mov­ing, and mov­ing alone, could in­crease the like­li­hood that a child at the bot­tom 20 per­cent of the in­come-dis­tri­bu­tion lad­der even­tu­ally rises to the top 20 per­cent, says Hendren.

Hendren and Chetty’s hy­po­thes­is fol­lows on the heels of their re­cent much-buzzed-about work, which found that where people live af­fects their fam­il­ies’ eco­nom­ic chances. Low-in­come chil­dren in cit­ies such as Bo­ston, New York, Pitt­s­burgh, Salt Lake City, San Jose, Seattle, and Wash­ing­ton en­joy much high­er rates of in­come mo­bil­ity than those in places such as At­lanta, Cin­cin­nati, Colum­bus, In­di­ana­pol­is, Mem­ph­is, and Raleigh. (The first group of cit­ies share some com­mon char­ac­ter­ist­ics, in­clud­ing so­cioeco­nom­ic­ally di­verse neigh­bor­hoods, high rates of civic en­gage­ment, and good schools.)

Mov­ing to where the jobs are dur­ing tough eco­nom­ic times — or where low-in­come kids have more op­por­tun­it­ies — may seem like an easy fix. Yet few­er Amer­ic­ans move today than did be­fore the re­ces­sion. Eco­nom­ists can­not agree on the reas­on every­one is stay­ing put. All they know for cer­tain is that, if Amer­ic­ans star­ted rent­ing mov­ing vans en masse, it would be a very good thing. 

For more on how chan­ging demo­graph­ics are re­shap­ing the na­tion, go to Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Next Amer­ica web­site.

What We're Following See More »
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
1 days ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
BRITISH PUBLICIST CONNECTED TO TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Source:
SPEAKING ON RUSSIAN STATE TV
Kislyak Says Trump Campaign Contacts Too Numerous to List
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak said on Wednesday that it would take him more than 20 minutes to name all of the Trump officials he's met with or spoken to on the phone. ... Kislyak made the remarks in a sprawling interview with Russia-1, a popular state-owned Russian television channel."

Source:
“BLOWING A SURE THING”
Sabato Moves Alabama to “Lean Democrat”
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login