Iraq Could Split, Says Former CIA Head

Mike Morell thinks a democratic, unified Iraq is unlikely to emerge from current chaos.

National Journal
Kaveh Waddell
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Kaveh Waddell
June 18, 2014, 10:14 a.m.

The cur­rent con­flict in Ir­aq may have already in­flic­ted ir­re­vers­ible dam­age on the coun­try, lead­ing either to par­ti­tion or to an Ir­an-backed dic­tat­or­ship.

That’s ac­cord­ing to Mike Mo­rell, the former act­ing dir­ect­or of the Cent­ral In­tel­li­gence Agency, in an in-depth in­ter­view with Charlie Rose on Tues­day. A mil­it­ant group called the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia has made sub­stan­tial ad­vances in Ir­aq in the past sev­er­al weeks, and is with­in strik­ing dis­tance of Bagh­dad.

Mo­rell said this con­flict rep­res­ents “the most ser­i­ous set of cir­cum­stances in the Middle East” since the Ar­ab-Is­raeli war in 1973.

The former deputy dir­ect­or en­vi­sioned three pos­sible scen­ari­os for Ir­aq’s im­me­di­ate fu­ture. The first pos­sib­il­ity is par­ti­tion. This would be the blood­i­est scen­ario and would stir up sec­tari­an vi­ol­ence, ac­cord­ing to Mo­rell, and will likely come true in the ab­sence of any out­side in­ter­ven­tion. In this scen­ario, Mo­rell said, “there will be an aw­ful lot of blood. There will be hu­man­it­ari­an crises.”

This would also mean that the mil­it­ants could use the ter­rit­ory they’ve taken over “as a safe haven from which to at­tack West­ern Europe and from which to at­tack the home­land.” And the con­flict could also “spill over in­to the rest of the re­gion.”

In an­oth­er scen­ario, Ir­aq could re­main in­tact, but sig­ni­fic­ant Ir­a­ni­an in­ter­ven­tion would turn  it in­to a “Shi’a dic­tat­or­ship” and a de facto pup­pet state. This would leave the coun­try in just as bad a situ­ation as it was be­fore the Amer­ic­an in­va­sion in 2003. “In es­sence, what hap­pens is, you have an Ir­aq as you did un­der Sad­dam [Hus­sein], but the lead­er is a Shi’a,” he said.

There is third pos­sib­il­ity, however. The ideal out­come would be if Ir­aq comes to­geth­er in a new demo­cracy un­der a new gov­ern­ing co­ali­tion. This would re­quire the in­volve­ment of the U.S., Ir­an, and mod­er­ate Sunni states, and the ouster of Ir­aqi Prime Min­is­ter Nouri al-Ma­liki.

Mo­rell was not op­tim­ist­ic about the chances of reach­ing a demo­crat­ic solu­tion. He ranked the three scen­ari­os above in des­cend­ing or­der of like­li­hood: a par­ti­tioned Ir­aq, an Ir­a­ni­an pup­pet state, then a uni­fied demo­cracy. Spe­cific­ally, he said that the ideal, demo­crat­ic out­come is un­likely be­cause of the twin chal­lenges of get­ting Ma­liki to step down and of find­ing someone to suc­ceed him who will be sup­por­ted by both Ir­aqi Sun­nis and Shi’a Ir­an.

As IS­IS ad­vances on Bagh­dad, Ir­aq’s fate re­mains un­clear. Any of these three scen­ari­os is pos­sible, but the only one that is re­motely at­tract­ive to the U.S. — and the one that is most prom­ising for Ir­aqi cit­izens — is the least likely.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×