Editor’s Note: About the Redesigned National Journal Magazine

National Journal
Richard Just
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Richard Just
June 18, 2014, 4 p.m.

Nation­al Journ­al magazine has a stor­ied his­tory, and if you live and breathe policy and polit­ics, then you know why. Scru­pu­lously non­par­tis­an, in­tel­lec­tu­ally hon­est, genu­inely ser­i­ous about gov­ern­ment and about ideas, Na­tion­al Journ­al has al­ways been a pub­lic­a­tion that every­one in D.C. could trust.

Those are the es­sen­tial val­ues that we wanted to take for­ward in­to the new Na­tion­al Journ­al. But we also knew that a lot about the magazine had to change. So many of the things that Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s print magazine was long known for are now be­ing done on our highly suc­cess­ful web­site — in great­er volume and with great­er speed than the magazine ever could have man­aged.

Yet we didn’t, and don’t, think the In­ter­net has made print ob­sol­ete. It has simply chal­lenged magazine ed­it­ors to ask them­selves: What is print still for?

(Harry Camp­bell)We’ve come up with a few an­swers to that ques­tion. A print magazine, we be­lieve, is for nar­rat­ive writ­ing that is beau­ti­fully craf­ted and deeply re­por­ted. It’s for journ­al­ism that takes big ideas ser­i­ously. It’s for long pieces that feel short be­cause they’re truly fun to read. It’s for telling stor­ies that are com­plic­ated and nu­anced — as al­most all stor­ies worth know­ing are. It’s for de­scrib­ing the char­ac­ters, fam­ous or un­known, who shape Amer­ic­an demo­cracy — and for un­der­stand­ing their agen­das, their mo­tiv­a­tions, their flaws, their strengths. It’s for pub­lish­ing es­tab­lished, bril­liant writers, and also for dis­cov­er­ing the next gen­er­a­tion of storytelling stars.

Fi­nally, we be­lieve that es­sen­tial to the ex­per­i­ence of read­ing a great print magazine is a beau­ti­ful design — el­eg­ant fonts, strik­ing il­lus­tra­tions, ex­cel­lent pho­to­graphy. Joseph Heroun bril­liantly re­con­ceived the magazine’s over­all look and cre­ated the stun­ning designs that fill the pages of our first is­sue. At the same time, we also wanted to re­ima­gine how we present our magazine pieces on­line. Jenny Mazer did a fant­ast­ic job of de­vis­ing an eye-catch­ing new di­git­al format for these pieces.

There are plenty of magazines that use the ap­proach to journ­al­ism we are now em­phas­iz­ing — that fo­cus on long-form writ­ing and great storytelling and out­stand­ing art. But there are no magazines that use this ap­proach to re­lent­lessly fo­cus on the world of policy and polit­ics — and that are broadly trus­ted across the polit­ic­al spec­trum. That is the kind of pub­lic­a­tion we aim to pro­duce.

For our first is­sue, we wanted to tell the stor­ies of some of the char­ac­ters and ideas that are likely to define the 2016 elec­tion. We hope you won’t miss any of these fea­ture pieces:

A Uni­fied The­ory of Hil­lary: To un­der­stand what kind of pres­id­ent she would be, con­sider that her greatest suc­cesses and worst fail­ures have the same ex­plan­a­tion. By Peter Bein­art

He Shall Not Be Moved: There’s no ob­vi­ous reas­on that Scott Walk­er should be pres­id­ent. And yet. By Tim Al­berta

“I’m Right and Every­body Else Is Wrong. Clear About That?” Bernie Sanders will likely rep­res­ent the hard-line Left in 2016. Will he help or hurt the move­ment? By Si­mon van Zuylen-Wood

Rand Paul’s New Con­fid­ant: Why the Ken­tucky sen­at­or and Nate Mor­ris be­came fast friends. By Shane Gold­mach­er

The Gonzo Op­tion: Bri­an Sch­weitzer is a one-man chal­lenge to the scrip­ted nature of mod­ern polit­ics. But just how much can you run your mouth while run­ning for pres­id­ent? By Mar­in Cogan

1952 All Over Again: It’s been more than six dec­ades since Re­pub­lic­an non­in­ter­ven­tion­ists were this in­flu­en­tial. They lost the battle to con­trol the party then — and chances are, they’re go­ing to lose this time, too. By Mi­chael Ger­son

In ad­di­tion, make sure to check out our short­er polit­ic­al nar­rat­ives, which we are fea­tur­ing in our new front-of-the-book sec­tion, The In­ner Loop:

The De­mise of Dixville Notch: And the un­cer­tain fu­ture of an odd polit­ic­al tra­di­tion. By Alex Seitz-Wald

The Biden Dyn­asty: What you can learn about Joe from get­ting to know Beau. By Nora Ca­plan-Brick­er

Why is Rick San­tor­um run­ning a movie stu­dio? By Kev­in Lin­coln

To pro­duce a ter­rif­ic magazine 32 times a year will be no easy task, but we are lucky to have some of the best magazine minds in the busi­ness steer­ing the ship — es­pe­cially our deputy ed­it­or, An­die Coller, and our man­aging ed­it­or, Aman­da Cormi­er. All of us are look­ing for­ward to cre­at­ing the new Na­tion­al Journ­al week after week for our mem­bers and sub­scribers. The magazine we are build­ing is one that we think Wash­ing­ton needs. More than any­thing, we hope it’s a magazine you en­joy.

Richard Just

Ed­it­or, Na­tion­al Journ­al magazine

What We're Following See More »
STRIKES DOWN NEW HAMPSHIRE BAN
Court: Selfies in Voting Booth Now OK
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
WILL LEAD U.S. DELEGATION
Obama to Travel to Israel for Peres’s Funeral
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS
FOUR-POINT LEAD IN FOUR-WAY RACE
Reuters/Ipsos Shows Clinton Ahead by 6
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

In one of the first polls released since Monday night's debate, a Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump 44%-38%. When third-party candidates are thrown into the mix, Clinton's share of the vote drops to 42%, with Gary Johnson picking up 7% and Jill Stein at 2%.

Source:
NO SHUTDOWN
Senate Votes to Fund Government
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Senate voted on Wednesday 72-26 on a bill to fund the government through Dec. 9, averting a looming shutdown. The legislation will now go to the House, where it could be voted on as early as Wednesday. After this legislation is approved by the House, Congress will recess until the lame-duck session following elections.

FIRST OVERRIDE OF HIS PRESIDENCY
House Completes Override of Obama Veto
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Congress voted Wednesday to override President Obama for the first time in his eight-year tenure, as the House followed the Senate in rejecting a veto of legislation allowing families of terrorist victims to sue Saudi Arabia. The House easily cleared the two-thirds threshold to push back against the veto. The final tally was 348-77, with 18 Republicans and 59 Democrats voting no."

Source:
×