Supreme Court Slightly Weakens EPA Global-Warming Program

The decision does not address EPA’s new proposals to set carbon-emissions standards for power plants.

Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2.1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
June 23, 2014, 6:54 a.m.

The Su­preme Court on Monday slightly weakened the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s power to force in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources to curb green­house-gas emis­sions as a con­di­tion of their Clean Air Act per­mits.

The de­cision does not ad­dress EPA’s re­cent sweep­ing pro­pos­al to set car­bon-emis­sions stand­ards for power plants, which is a center­piece of Pres­id­ent Obama’s second-term cli­mate agenda. Nor does it chal­lenge EPA’s un­der­ly­ing au­thor­ity to reg­u­late heat-trap­ping emis­sions.

In­stead, the rul­ing ad­dresses an ex­ist­ing per­mit­ting pro­gram launched sev­er­al years ago.

The high court ruled 5-4 that EPA may only re­quire newly built or mod­i­fied in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources — such as power plants, re­finer­ies and factor­ies — to lim­it green­house gases if those same sources must already ob­tain per­mits for their so-called con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants. 

In prac­tice, that means only a slight change in the num­ber of big in­dus­tri­al pol­luters that would be cap­tured by the ex­ist­ing, case-by-case green­house-gas per­mit­ting pro­gram at is­sue in the case de­cided Monday. The per­mit­ting pro­gram it­self was not struck down.

The per­mit­ting pro­gram re­quires pol­luters to use so-called best avail­able con­trol tech­no­logy, which for green­house gases has largely meant in­creased en­ergy ef­fi­ciency thus far, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion noted when de­fend­ing the pro­gram be­fore the Court in Feb­ru­ary.

Lim­it­ing the pro­gram to fa­cil­it­ies that must already get per­mits for their con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants (such as emis­sions that cause smog) ad­dresses the sources of 83 per­cent of U.S. green­house-gas emis­sions from in­dus­tri­al pol­luters, com­pared with 86 per­cent without that re­stric­tion, ac­cord­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

“EPA is get­ting al­most everything it wanted in this case,” Justice Ant­on­in Scalia said from the bench in an­noun­cing the rul­ing Monday, ac­cord­ing to press ac­counts.

However, there will be plenty of tea-leaves read­ing about what this por­tends for the sweep­ing power-plant stand­ards that EPA is plan­ning to fi­nal­ize next June, es­pe­cially about wheth­er con­ser­vat­ive justices will take a nar­row view of the scope of EPA’s dis­cre­tion in craft­ing that reg­u­la­tion.

EPA called the rul­ing a vic­tory.

“The Su­preme Court’s de­cision is a win for our ef­forts to re­duce car­bon pol­lu­tion be­cause it al­lows EPA, states, and oth­er per­mit­ting au­thor­it­ies to con­tin­ue to re­quire car­bon-pol­lu­tion lim­its in per­mits for the largest pol­lu­tion sources,” the agency said in a state­ment.

However, the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute, one of an ar­ray of in­dustry lob­by­ing groups to chal­lenge EPA’s per­mit­ting rules, saw good news as well.

“It is a stark re­mind­er that the EPA’s power is not un­lim­ited,” said Harry Ng, the group’s gen­er­al coun­sel.

What We're Following See More »
$618 BILLION IN FUNDING
By a Big Margin, House Passes Defense Bill
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."

Source:
SUCCEEDS UPTON
Walden to Chair Energy and Commerce Committee
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.

Source:
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
Senators Looking to Limit Deportations Under Trump
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.

Source:
REQUIRES CHANGE IN LAW
Trump Taps Mattis for Defense Secretary
3 days ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.

Source:
MEASURE HEADED TO OBAMA
Senate OKs 10-Year Extension of Iran Sanctions
3 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login