Supreme Court Slightly Weakens EPA Global-Warming Program

The decision does not address EPA’s new proposals to set carbon-emissions standards for power plants.

Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2.1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
June 23, 2014, 6:54 a.m.

The Su­preme Court on Monday slightly weakened the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s power to force in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources to curb green­house-gas emis­sions as a con­di­tion of their Clean Air Act per­mits.

The de­cision does not ad­dress EPA’s re­cent sweep­ing pro­pos­al to set car­bon-emis­sions stand­ards for power plants, which is a center­piece of Pres­id­ent Obama’s second-term cli­mate agenda. Nor does it chal­lenge EPA’s un­der­ly­ing au­thor­ity to reg­u­late heat-trap­ping emis­sions.

In­stead, the rul­ing ad­dresses an ex­ist­ing per­mit­ting pro­gram launched sev­er­al years ago.

The high court ruled 5-4 that EPA may only re­quire newly built or mod­i­fied in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources — such as power plants, re­finer­ies and factor­ies — to lim­it green­house gases if those same sources must already ob­tain per­mits for their so-called con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants. 

In prac­tice, that means only a slight change in the num­ber of big in­dus­tri­al pol­luters that would be cap­tured by the ex­ist­ing, case-by-case green­house-gas per­mit­ting pro­gram at is­sue in the case de­cided Monday. The per­mit­ting pro­gram it­self was not struck down.

The per­mit­ting pro­gram re­quires pol­luters to use so-called best avail­able con­trol tech­no­logy, which for green­house gases has largely meant in­creased en­ergy ef­fi­ciency thus far, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion noted when de­fend­ing the pro­gram be­fore the Court in Feb­ru­ary.

Lim­it­ing the pro­gram to fa­cil­it­ies that must already get per­mits for their con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants (such as emis­sions that cause smog) ad­dresses the sources of 83 per­cent of U.S. green­house-gas emis­sions from in­dus­tri­al pol­luters, com­pared with 86 per­cent without that re­stric­tion, ac­cord­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

“EPA is get­ting al­most everything it wanted in this case,” Justice Ant­on­in Scalia said from the bench in an­noun­cing the rul­ing Monday, ac­cord­ing to press ac­counts.

However, there will be plenty of tea-leaves read­ing about what this por­tends for the sweep­ing power-plant stand­ards that EPA is plan­ning to fi­nal­ize next June, es­pe­cially about wheth­er con­ser­vat­ive justices will take a nar­row view of the scope of EPA’s dis­cre­tion in craft­ing that reg­u­la­tion.

EPA called the rul­ing a vic­tory.

“The Su­preme Court’s de­cision is a win for our ef­forts to re­duce car­bon pol­lu­tion be­cause it al­lows EPA, states, and oth­er per­mit­ting au­thor­it­ies to con­tin­ue to re­quire car­bon-pol­lu­tion lim­its in per­mits for the largest pol­lu­tion sources,” the agency said in a state­ment.

However, the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute, one of an ar­ray of in­dustry lob­by­ing groups to chal­lenge EPA’s per­mit­ting rules, saw good news as well.

“It is a stark re­mind­er that the EPA’s power is not un­lim­ited,” said Harry Ng, the group’s gen­er­al coun­sel.

What We're Following See More »
Obamacare Premiums Set to Soar Next Year
44 minutes ago

The "benchmark" Obamacare silver plan—"upon which federal subsidies are based—will cost an average of $296 a month next year," an increase of 22% over current averages. That figure, however, "masks wide variation among the states. In Arizona, the benchmark plan's average premium will increase 116% in 2017. Arizona had the lowest rates of any state this year, said Kathryn Martin, an acting assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. In Indiana, the benchmark plan will be 3% cheaper."

Ron Klain in Line to Be Clinton’s Chief of Staff?
45 minutes ago

Sources tell CNN that longtime Democratic operative Ron Klain, who has been Vice President Biden's chief of staff, is "high on the list of prospects" to be chief of staff in a Clinton White House. "John Podesta, the campaign chairman, has signaled his interest in joining the Cabinet, perhaps as Energy secretary."

Uphill Battle for AT&T/Time Warner Deal
45 minutes ago

"AT&T Inc.’s $85.4 billion deal to buy Time Warner Inc. sails toward two cresting waves of opposition: resurgent antitrust enforcement in Washington and politicians fired by a new bipartisan populist rage. It is too early to know how regulators will treat the AT&T-Time Warner deal. But after several quiet years, President Barack Obama’s antitrust team has switched into high gear in response to a recent spurt of deal-making," a trend that's likely to continue into the next administration. The Obama Justice Department has scuttled 43 mergers, "more than double the mergers blocked by the preceding Bush Justice Department."

CNN/ORC Has Clinton Up 5 Points
14 hours ago

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 49%-44% in a new CNN/ORC poll out Monday afternoon. But it's Gary Johnson's performance, or lack thereof, that's the real story. Johnson, who had cleared 10% in some surveys earlier this fall, as he made a bid to qualify for the debates, is down to 3% support. He must hit 5% nationwide for the Libertarian Party to qualify for some federal matching funds in future elections.

McCarthy, Pelosi Team Up on National Guard Bonuses
17 hours ago

The majority and minority leader of the House are both saying "California's veterans are not to blame for being mistakenly overpaid, after a Los Angeles Times story revealed that officials are trying to claw back millions in bonuses from California National Guardsmen. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the efforts to recoup the money 'disgraceful,' and asked for the Department of Defense to waive the repayments soldiers would be forced to make if they inappropriately received re-enlistment bonuses for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she's looking for a "legislative fix" in the lame-duck session.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.