Supreme Court Slightly Weakens EPA Global-Warming Program

The decision does not address EPA’s new proposals to set carbon-emissions standards for power plants.

Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2.1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
June 23, 2014, 6:54 a.m.

The Su­preme Court on Monday slightly weakened the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s power to force in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources to curb green­house-gas emis­sions as a con­di­tion of their Clean Air Act per­mits.

The de­cision does not ad­dress EPA’s re­cent sweep­ing pro­pos­al to set car­bon-emis­sions stand­ards for power plants, which is a center­piece of Pres­id­ent Obama’s second-term cli­mate agenda. Nor does it chal­lenge EPA’s un­der­ly­ing au­thor­ity to reg­u­late heat-trap­ping emis­sions.

In­stead, the rul­ing ad­dresses an ex­ist­ing per­mit­ting pro­gram launched sev­er­al years ago.

The high court ruled 5-4 that EPA may only re­quire newly built or mod­i­fied in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources — such as power plants, re­finer­ies and factor­ies — to lim­it green­house gases if those same sources must already ob­tain per­mits for their so-called con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants. 

In prac­tice, that means only a slight change in the num­ber of big in­dus­tri­al pol­luters that would be cap­tured by the ex­ist­ing, case-by-case green­house-gas per­mit­ting pro­gram at is­sue in the case de­cided Monday. The per­mit­ting pro­gram it­self was not struck down.

The per­mit­ting pro­gram re­quires pol­luters to use so-called best avail­able con­trol tech­no­logy, which for green­house gases has largely meant in­creased en­ergy ef­fi­ciency thus far, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion noted when de­fend­ing the pro­gram be­fore the Court in Feb­ru­ary.

Lim­it­ing the pro­gram to fa­cil­it­ies that must already get per­mits for their con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants (such as emis­sions that cause smog) ad­dresses the sources of 83 per­cent of U.S. green­house-gas emis­sions from in­dus­tri­al pol­luters, com­pared with 86 per­cent without that re­stric­tion, ac­cord­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

“EPA is get­ting al­most everything it wanted in this case,” Justice Ant­on­in Scalia said from the bench in an­noun­cing the rul­ing Monday, ac­cord­ing to press ac­counts.

However, there will be plenty of tea-leaves read­ing about what this por­tends for the sweep­ing power-plant stand­ards that EPA is plan­ning to fi­nal­ize next June, es­pe­cially about wheth­er con­ser­vat­ive justices will take a nar­row view of the scope of EPA’s dis­cre­tion in craft­ing that reg­u­la­tion.

EPA called the rul­ing a vic­tory.

“The Su­preme Court’s de­cision is a win for our ef­forts to re­duce car­bon pol­lu­tion be­cause it al­lows EPA, states, and oth­er per­mit­ting au­thor­it­ies to con­tin­ue to re­quire car­bon-pol­lu­tion lim­its in per­mits for the largest pol­lu­tion sources,” the agency said in a state­ment.

However, the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute, one of an ar­ray of in­dustry lob­by­ing groups to chal­lenge EPA’s per­mit­ting rules, saw good news as well.

“It is a stark re­mind­er that the EPA’s power is not un­lim­ited,” said Harry Ng, the group’s gen­er­al coun­sel.

What We're Following See More »
TO BE VOTED ON NEXT MONTH
Pai Officially Announces Intent to Scrap Net Neutrality Rules
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
SAYS HE’S UNAWARE OF ACCUSATIONS
Conyers Denies Settling Harassment Claims
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
SPEAKER SAYS IN LETTER
Mugabe Resigns, Ending Impeachment Debate
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
HAITIANS TO BE MOST AFFECTED
White House to End TPS Program
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is ending a humanitarian program that has allowed some 59,000 Haitians to live and work in the United States since an earthquake ravaged their country in 2010, Homeland Security officials said on Monday. Haitians with what is known as Temporary Protected Status will be expected to leave the United States by July 2019 or face deportation. ... About 320,000 people now benefit from the Temporary Protected Status program, which was signed into law by President George Bush in 1990."

Source:
MAKES PERMANENT A PREVIOUS INJUNCTION
Federal Judge Blocks Sanctuary Cities Order
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A federal judge on Monday permanently blocked President Donald Trump's executive order to cut funding from cities that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities. U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick rejected the administration's argument that the executive order applies only to a relatively small pot of money and said Trump cannot set new conditions on spending approved by Congress. The judge had previously made the same arguments in a ruling that put a temporary hold on the executive order."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login