Highlights in Obama’s Budget

National Journal
Eliza Krigman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Eliza Krigman
March 4, 2014, 3:16 p.m.

A new Com­merce De­part­ment re­port on U.S. house­holds and ac­cess to high-speed In­ter­net ser­vice has found us­age gaps that fall along ra­cial lines, which of­fi­cials say can­not be ex­plained by in­come and edu­ca­tion levels alone.

“An Afric­an-Amer­ic­an house­hold with the same in­come and edu­ca­tion level as a white house­hold is still less likely to have broad­band ac­cess,” Re­becca Blank, Com­merce’s un­der­sec­ret­ary for eco­nom­ic af­fairs, said today in re­leas­ing the re­port. “That find­ing is quite strik­ing, and it’s not something we ex­pec­ted to see.”

The re­port, “Di­git­al Na­tion II,” is the “most com­pre­hens­ive ana­lys­is of broad­band us­age,” avail­able, Blank said in a con­fer­ence call with re­port­ers. To pro­duce the re­port, the de­part­ment, in col­lab­or­a­tion with the Na­tion­al Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions and In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion, ana­lyzed data from the Census Bur­eau’s In­ter­net Us­age Sur­vey of 54,000 house­holds col­lec­ted in Oc­to­ber 2009.

“What the ana­lys­is shows is that we must have very tar­geted pro­grams for spe­cif­ic pop­u­la­tions,” said Lawrence Strick­ling, as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary for com­mu­nic­a­tions and in­form­a­tion, who par­ti­cip­ated in the call.

When asked what might ex­plain the di­git­al di­vide between races, Blank said that it’s im­port­ant to not en­tirely dis­count the im­pact of edu­ca­tion and in­come, and that a “whole set of his­tor­ic­al reas­ons” may help ex­plain why some groups have little pres­ence on the In­ter­net. Be­ing on the Web is closely re­lated to wheth­er your friends and fam­ily are there, he ad­ded.

Con­trolling for so­cioeco­nom­ic factors, the broad­band ad­op­tion gap between races per­sisted, the re­port said, and also broke along on urb­an and rur­al lines.

The ad­op­tion gap between rur­al and urb­an house­holds is 7 per­cent; between non-His­pan­ic whites and non-His­pan­ic blacks, the fig­ure is 10 per­cent.

Over­all, sev­en of 10 house­holds used the In­ter­net in 2009; nearly one-fourth of all house­holds did not have an In­ter­net user.

Lack of af­ford­ab­il­ity, need, in­terest, ad­equate equip­ment, and avail­ab­il­ity were the primary reas­ons stated for not hav­ing broad­band ac­cess at home. Un­sur­pris­ingly, house­holds that did not use the In­ter­net at home but re­por­ted us­ing it else­where ranked af­ford­ab­il­ity as the primary obstacle to home ad­op­tion. In con­trast, non-In­ter­net users first and fore­most cited lack of need or in­terest.

A macro-view of the data re­vealed that broad­band use is grow­ing rap­idly, of­fi­cials said.

Between 2001 and 2009, In­ter­net use rose sev­en­fold, from 9 per­cent to 64 per­cent of Amer­ic­an house­holds. Some groups with lower-than-av­er­age ad­op­tion rates made sig­ni­fic­ant gains but not enough to close the ad­op­tion gaps with­in demo­graph­ic groups defined by in­come, edu­ca­tion, race, eth­ni­city, and age.

House­holds mak­ing less than $25,000 a year made a twelve­fold leap in broad­band ad­op­tion, from 3 per­cent to 36 per­cent from 2001 to 2009; that’s a much faster clip than among house­holds mak­ing more than $75,000 year, but still not enough to close the con­nectiv­ity gap — 36 per­cent com­pared with 92 per­cent in 2009. That trend per­sisted among oth­er groups, the study found.

Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion Chair­man Ju­li­us Gen­achow­ski praised the NTIA and the Com­merce De­part­ment for their work.

“The NTIA’s new re­port provides an in-depth look at the per­sist­ent gaps between the di­git­al haves and di­git­al have-nots,” Gen­achow­ski said in a state­ment. “Clos­ing these gaps is one of the top pri­or­it­ies of the FCC’s na­tion­al broad­band plan and a key fo­cus of the agency.”

What We're Following See More »
CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
54 minutes ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
1 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
2 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
2 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."

EPA Didn’t Warn Flint Residents Soon Enough
2 hours ago

According to a new report, the Environmental Protection Agency waited too long before informing the residents of Flint, Mich. that their water was contaminated with lead. Written by the EPA's inspector general, it places blame squarely at the foot of the agency itself, saying it had enough information by June 2015 to issue an emergency order. However, the order wasn't issued until the end of January 2016.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.