Cat Litter’s Role in Nuclear Leak Still Unproven

Global Security Newswire Staff
June 30, 2014, 8:35 a.m.

U.S. labor­at­or­ies failed to rep­lic­ate a cat-lit­ter re­ac­tion hy­po­thes­ized to have rup­tured a stor­age drum in an un­der­ground nuc­le­ar-waste dump, Re­u­ters re­ports.

Neither Los Alam­os Na­tion­al Labor­at­ory in New Mex­ico nor any of the na­tion’s oth­er atom­ic re­search cen­ters have pro­duced the type of thermal re­ac­tion tent­at­ively blamed for a Feb­ru­ary con­tam­in­a­tion re­lease at the Waste Isol­a­tion Pi­lot Plant, En­ergy De­part­ment spokes­wo­man Lind­sey Geisler said on Fri­day. The breach was the­or­et­ic­ally caused by a cat-lit­ter and ni­trate-salt pack­ing mix placed in hun­dreds of waste bar­rels at the Los Alam­os fa­cil­ity.

“There’s still a lot we don’t know,” Geisler said. The waste com­plex near Carls­bad has re­mained largely off-lim­its since the re­lease spread ra­dio­act­ive particles to 22 work­ers earli­er this year.

The En­ergy De­part­ment is ex­amin­ing pos­sible al­tern­at­ive meth­ods of deal­ing with ma­ter­i­als pre­vi­ously sched­uled for ship­ment to the re­pos­it­ory, Geisler ad­ded.

Fully re­sum­ing op­er­a­tions at the sub­ter­ranean stor­age site may re­quire up to 36 months, ac­cord­ing to over­sight of­fi­cials. A lengthy re­cov­ery peri­od would raise ques­tions over how to handle waste con­tain­ers pre­vi­ously slated for ship­ment to the fa­cil­ity from Los Alam­os, Idaho Na­tion­al Labor­at­ory and oth­er loc­a­tions, ac­cord­ing to Re­u­ters.

Mean­while, the pos­sib­il­ity of a con­tam­in­a­tion threat from prob­lem­at­ic waste drums has fo­cused new at­ten­tion on a leg­al ac­tion against New Mex­ico’s state gov­ern­ment, the Santa Fe New Mex­ic­an re­por­ted on Fri­day. The South­w­est Re­search and In­form­a­tion Cen­ter’s 2-year-old law­suit chal­lenges New Mex­ico’s de­cision to per­mit use of a new type of waste con­tain­er without first con­sult­ing the pub­lic.

State en­vir­on­ment per­son­nel stood by their ac­tions in court last week, ac­cord­ing to the New Mex­ic­an.

What We're Following See More »
“PROFOUNDLY DANGEROUS”
Clinton Rips Into Trump
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.

SEVEN-POINT LEAD IN A FOUR-WAY
Quinnipiac Has Clinton Over 50%
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.

Source:
PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED
Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
MIGHT STILL ACCEPT FOREIGN AND CORPORATE MONEY
Chelsea to Stay on Board of Clinton Foundation
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."

Source:
INTERCEPT IN MIDDLE EAST
Navy Calls Iranian Ships’ Actions Dangerous, Unprofessional
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.

Source:
×