Even though Speaker John Boehner has announced his intention to have the House sue President Obama for alleged nonenforcement of laws, don’t expect that suit to come to a courthouse near you anytime soon. For now, the threatened litigation will remain a handy punchline for a president scornful of what he sees as a partisan stunt and a heavy promise from a speaker frustrated by what he sees as executive overreach.
In the long run, the suit faces constitutional and legal hurdles almost guaranteed to drag the process out for several years. These include the historic reluctance of the Supreme Court to referee spats between the other two coequal branches of government as well as the always-prickly question of whether Boehner and the Republicans have standing to file the suit.
Boehner has been exploring the possible suit for six months, disclosing it last month to his caucus. In a memo to his fellow Republicans, he argued that the House has standing if the full House authorizes the action, if “harm is being done to the general welfare,” and if “there is no legislative remedy.” Those skeptical of the suit have contended that the House has legislative remedies with its control of the purse strings and its impeachment power.
Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said the measure will first go to the Rules Committee for either a hearing or a markup. “At that point, it will be clear what specific action or actions the lawsuit will target. After that, we’ll have a vote in the full House,” he said. Republicans hope to have that vote in July.
After that, Steel said, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) “will work with the House counsel to file the lawsuit itself.” He stressed that many decisions still must be made before any lawsuit can be crafted.
Despite the “bipartisan” part of BLAG’s name, it is a group ready to do Boehner’s bidding. The panel, created in 1993, consists of the speaker, the majority leader and majority whip, and the minority leader and minority whip—guaranteeing a 3-2 vote to file the suit.
Steel would not commit to a suit being filed before Labor Day. But he vigorously refuted suggestions that talk of the suit is a ploy solely designed to gin up the GOP base prior to the November elections. “That’s simply not true,” he said. The speaker also denied that motivation, telling reporters, “No. This is about defending the institution in which we serve.”
Despite these protestations, that is exactly how the threatened suit is being treated by the White House. Even if a suit is filed, they believe it could not be decided during Obama’s presidency. And they see it in purely political terms. To them, it has become a punchline, with Obama drawing laughs and cheers when he joked, “So sue me.” In Minnesota last week, he said he may “in the heat of the moment” have challenged Republicans to take him to court. But, he added, “I didn’t think they’d take it literally.”
Republicans are not laughing, though, and are increasingly irritated by the president’s response. “I just find it pretty troubling,” said Steel. “This isn’t something that should be treated flippantly.”
What We're Following See More »
The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."
"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.
"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.
Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.