Internal U.S. government standards for determining whether individuals should be added to a terrorism watchlist have been leaked to the media.
The Intercept, an investigative news website, on Wednesday published the government’s “Watchlisting Guidance,” which was current as of March 2013, the New York Times reported. The Intercept indicated that the internal rules were obtained by a source other than former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who is well known for his collaboration with the website.
The watchlist rule book says that incriminating actions that would implicate an individual include traveling to a terrorist training school or having multiple contacts with known terrorists. Practices protected under the First Amendment, such as religious beliefs or communications that malign U.S. policies, are not enough to warrant placement on the no-fly list. However, the rules note that actions that are protected under the First Amendment for U.S. citizens do not apply to foreigners in other countries. Incitement or the encouragement of extremist strikes can be used to suggest someone for inclusion on the watchlist.
In May, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder argued that the watchlist standards should remain confidential. “If the guidance were released, it would provide a clear road map to undermine the government’s screening efforts, a key counterterrorism measure, and thus its disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause significant harm to national security,” Holder said in a court affidavit.
The government entity responsible for deciding who is placed on the terrorism watchlist is the Terrorism Screening Center, a branch of the FBI. The bureau did not return a request for comment.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.