The Senate Intelligence Committee will not make its findings on Bush-era “enhanced interrogation” programs available to the public until the Obama administration can explain why it heavily redacted portions of the panel’s report on CIA torture techniques.
Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein is unsatisfied with the amount of redacted material, saying the report will stay classified until the administration can explain the blackouts.
“After further review of the redacted version of the executive summary, I have concluded the redactions eliminate or obscure key facts that support the report’s findings and conclusions,” the powerful California Democrat said in a statement Tuesday. “Until these redactions are addressed to the committee’s satisfaction, the report will not be made public.”
Last week, the White House returned the so-called “torture report” to the Intelligence Committee, but Feinstein said she would need to review the redactions before deciding whether to make the report public. Other senators blasted the administration for attempting to conceal embarrassing details contained in the panel’s 500-page executive summary of the larger study.
“Redactions are supposed to remove names or anything that could compromise sources and methods, not to undermine the source material so that it is impossible to understand,” said Sen. Martin Heinrich, a New Mexico Democrat, in a statement. “Try reading a novel with 15 percent of the words blacked out. It can’t be done properly.”
In response to the backlash, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper justified the deletions as necessary and noted that half of them were made in the document’s footnotes.
But Feinstein is demanding more answers and is unwilling to release the report as it currently stands.
“I am sending a letter today to the president laying out a series of changes to the redactions that we believe are necessary prior to public release,” Feinstein said. “This process will take some time, and the report will not be released until I am satisfied that all redactions are appropriate.”
She continued: “The bottom line is that the United States must never again make the mistakes documented in this report. … That is why I believe taking our time and getting it right is so important, and I will not rush this process.”
Also on Tuesday, Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, criticized the redactions as “totally unacceptable.” He added that there was “multiple instances where CIA proposes to redact information that has already been publicly disclosed” in a 2009 report on detainee abuse written by the Senate Armed Services Committee, which Levin chairs.
The torture report, some of which has been leaked already, is widely believed to conclude that the CIA’s use of waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation” practices yielded little to no valuable national security information that could not have otherwise been obtained using more traditional intelligence-gathering methods.
On Friday, President Obama referred to the report during a press conference, indicating at the time that its release was imminent. Obama also condemned the interrogation protocol used by the Bush administration, which he banned when he took office.
“In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, we did some things that were wrong,” Obama said. “We did a whole lot of things that were right, but we tortured some folks. We did some things that were contrary to our values.”
Feinstein’s salvo is just the latest in an ongoing feud between her panel and the CIA.
Last week, the CIA admitted it improperly accessed computers used by Senate Intelligence staffers to investigate the spy agency’s detention, rendition, and interrogation practices deployed during George W. Bush’s presidency. CIA Director John Brennan determined that his employees “acted in a manner inconsistent with the common understanding” brokered between his agency and its Senate overseers.
At least three senators, including Heinrich, have asked for Brennan to step down.
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.