The Republican Party Loves Uber

Touting the ride-share service as a beacon of free-market innovation, Republicans launched a “support Uber” petition Wednesday.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Aug. 6, 2014, 8:37 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an Party is in love with Uber, and it wants to pub­licly dis­play its af­fec­tion all over the In­ter­net.

The Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee blas­ted out an email Wed­nes­day en­cour­aging sup­port­ers to sign a new pe­ti­tion in sup­port of “in­nov­at­ive com­pan­ies like Uber,” a pop­u­lar ride-shar­ing ser­vice that has sprung up in more than 160 cit­ies world­wide, much to the chag­rin of more tra­di­tion­al taxi fleets.

“Our cit­ies also de­serve in­nov­at­ive, ef­fi­cient, and safe trans­port­a­tion choices without ex­cess­ive and in­trus­ive bur­eau­crat­ic red tape,” the email, which doubles as a fun­drais­ing pitch, reads. “That’s why our cit­ies need in­nov­at­ive solu­tions like the Uber car ser­vice.”

Uber al­lows those in need of a quick lift to use a mo­bile app to or­der a driver. It and sim­il­ar ride-shar­ing com­pan­ies have be­come hugely pop­u­lar among young urb­an­ites, but they are barred or re­stric­ted in a num­ber of cit­ies. Loc­al of­fi­cials in Seattle passed a law earli­er this year lim­it­ing the num­ber of al­tern­at­ive taxi drivers al­lowed on the road at any giv­en time.

Those sort of laws are de­rided in the email, writ­ten by RNC Fin­ance Dir­ect­or Katie Walsh, as at­tempts “to block Uber from provid­ing ser­vices simply be­cause it’s cut­ting in­to the taxi uni­ons’ profits.”

Wed­nes­day’s pe­ti­tion was as­sembled without Uber’s know­ledge, and the com­pany is for now choos­ing to re­main mum about the GOP’s sud­den em­brace, oth­er than to say in a state­ment: “Every­one loves Uber!”

Boast­ing the vir­tues of Uber is noth­ing new for Re­pub­lic­ans. In March, Sen. Marco Ru­bio gave a speech tout­ing the ride-share com­pany as a dis­rupt­ive tech­no­logy that shouldn’t be lim­ited by big gov­ern­ment.

“What reg­u­la­tion should nev­er be is a way to pre­vent in­nov­a­tion from hap­pen­ing,” Ru­bio, a po­ten­tial 2016 pres­id­en­tial hope­ful, said at the time. “It should nev­er al­low gov­ern­ment … to pro­tect es­tab­lished in­cum­bents at the ex­pense of an in­nov­at­ive com­pet­it­or.”

Once a loud stand­ard-bear­er for im­mig­ra­tion re­form, Ru­bio’s pivot to­ward tech is­sues ap­pears to sig­nal a new strategy with­in the GOP for how to res­on­ate with young, urb­an voters.

Ru­bio’s ad­u­la­tion of Uber fol­lowed a speech he gave at Google’s Wash­ing­ton of­fice, where he noted that ride-shar­ing re­stric­tions were something young voters cared about.

“For the first time, I see young people that po­ten­tially might be friendly to more gov­ern­ment in­volve­ment in our eco­nomy ar­guing against reg­u­lat­ory im­ped­i­ments to an ex­ist­ing busi­ness—in this case, gov­ern­ment crowding them out,” the fresh­man sen­at­or said.

A Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee spokes­wo­man said the pe­ti­tion was cre­ated without con­sult­ing Ru­bio, but the party has ap­par­ently caught wind of the Flor­ida Re­pub­lic­an’s tech-first mes­sage.

Sev­er­al large cit­ies across the coun­try are grap­pling with how, or wheth­er, to change their taxi codes to ad­dress the grow­ing en­croach­ment of al­tern­at­ive trans­port­a­tion com­pan­ies, in­clud­ing Uber, Ly­ft, and Side­car.

The tim­ing of the pe­ti­tion co­in­cides with the GOP’s sum­mer meet­ing in Chica­go, where Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn, a Demo­crat, is weigh­ing le­gis­la­tion on his desk that would cre­ate statewide re­stric­tions on ride-shar­ing com­pan­ies.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login