Exxon Blasts Movement to Divest From Fossil Fuels

The oil giant seeks to counter the campaign that urges investors to dump stock in petroleum and coal companies.

BURBANK, CA - FEBRUARY 01: An Exxon gas station advertises its gas prices on February 1, 2008 in Burbank, California. Exxon Mobil Corp. has posted an annual profit of $40.6 billion, the largest ever by a US company, and set a new US record for the highest quarterly profit, $11.7 billion for the last three months of 2007. The previous annual profit record, $39.5 billion, was set by Exxon in 2006. The company's revenue also rose 30 percent in the fourth quarter, from $90 billion a year ago to $116.6 billion. Yearly sales were up from $377.64 billion in 2006 to a new company record of $404.5 billion. Exxon was particularly benefited by historic crude prices at the end of the year. Exxon Mobil is the world?s largest publicly traded oil company. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
Oct. 13, 2014, 1:38 p.m.

Ex­xon Mo­bil is wield­ing its pub­lic re­la­tions might against the fossil-fuel di­vest­ment move­ment, sig­nal­ing that cli­mate-change act­iv­ists have struck a nerve at the world’s biggest pub­licly traded oil and gas com­pany.

Ex­xon Mo­bil’s blog, titled “Per­spect­ives,” pos­ted a lengthy at­tack Fri­day about the di­vest­ment move­ment, which urges uni­versit­ies, churches, pen­sion funds, and oth­er big in­sti­tu­tion­al in­vestors to dump their shares of oil and coal com­pan­ies as part of the fight against glob­al warm­ing.

But the blog post calls the move­ment “out of step with real­ity,” say­ing it’s at odds with the need for poor na­tions to gain bet­ter ac­cess to en­ergy, as well as the need for fossil fuels to meet glob­al en­ergy de­mand for dec­ades to come.

So far, the cli­mate ad­voc­ates’ pro­gress at get­ting a grow­ing num­ber of in­sti­tu­tions to shed hold­ings in fossil fuel com­pan­ies re­mains pretty small com­pared with the scale of the in­dustry they’re bat­tling.

Con­sider that the roughly 1,700 oil-and-gas and coal com­pan­ies lis­ted on stock ex­changes are worth nearly $5 tril­lion, notes the re­search com­pany Bloomberg New En­ergy Fin­ance.

But the di­vest­ment move­ment has been grow­ing— just last week the Uni­versity of Glas­gow be­came the first European uni­versity to an­nounce di­vest­ment plans. And the move­ment also has a num­ber of high-pro­file ad­her­ents, in­clud­ing Arch­bish­op Des­mond Tutu, the South Afric­an No­bel Prize-win­ning anti-apartheid lead­er. (The fossil fuel di­vest­ment move­ment takes its cues from the 1970s and 1980s move­ment ur­ging di­vest­ment from apartheid South Africa.)

An­oth­er sup­port­er is Chris­ti­ana Figueres, the United Na­tions of­fi­cial shep­herd­ing in­ter­na­tion­al ne­go­ti­ations aimed at reach­ing a new glob­al cli­mate pact in late 2015.

But Ex­xon calls di­vest­ment a mis­placed solu­tion to cli­mate change.

“Di­vest­ment rep­res­ents a di­ver­sion from the real search for tech­no­lo­gic­al solu­tions to man­aging cli­mate risks that en­ergy com­pan­ies like ours are pur­su­ing,” writes Ken Co­hen, Ex­xon’s VP for pub­lic and gov­ern­ment af­fairs.

Co­hen’s post ar­gues that the move­ment ig­nores the scale of glob­al en­ergy de­mand for power, trans­port­a­tion, and oth­er needs, as well as “the in­ab­il­ity of cur­rent re­new­able tech­no­lo­gies to meet it.”

“Al­most every place on the plan­et where there is grind­ing poverty, there is also en­ergy poverty. Wherever there is sub­sist­ence liv­ing, it is usu­ally be­cause there is little or no ac­cess to mod­ern, re­li­able forms of en­ergy,” Co­hen writes.

Di­vest­ment ad­voc­ates will find plenty of ma­ter­i­al to ar­gue about in Ex­xon’s post. In one case, Ex­xon cites es­tim­ates that re­new­able en­ergy’s share of the total glob­al mix will be about 15 per­cent in 2040.

But the act­iv­ists push­ing for di­vest­ment, such as Bill McK­ib­ben’s 350.org, ad­voc­ate for more ag­gress­ive policies that pro­mote low-car­bon en­ergy, and ana­lysts say that would change the glob­al mix a lot more and a lot faster.

While the In­ter­na­tion­al En­ergy Agency has fore­cast that without policy changes, re­new­ables will meet about 15 per­cent of total en­ergy needs in 2035, IEA and oth­er agen­cies have also modeled vari­ous oth­er scen­ari­os in which low-car­bon en­ergy takes a far lar­ger share.

For in­stance, in late Septem­ber, IEA re­leased a “roadmap” of policies ex­plain­ing how sol­ar power alone could be­come the world’s biggest source of elec­tri­city by 2050 or even earli­er.

Di­vest­ment ad­voc­ates have already cri­ti­cized Ex­xon’s post.

“This is the oil in­dustry say­ing ‘please don’t be mean to me’ after bul­ly­ing vul­ner­able com­munit­ies around the globe for dec­ades,” said Ana­stas­ia Schemkes, a cam­paign rep­res­ent­at­ive with the Si­erra Stu­dent Co­ali­tion.

Rev­er­end Fletch­er Harp­er, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the pro-di­vest­ment group Green­Faith, took is­sue with Ex­xon’s as­ser­tions that the di­vest­ment move­ment is out of touch. “Di­vest­ment ad­voc­ates have been clear from the start that the di­vest­ment cam­paign is about call­ing in­to ques­tion the in­dustry’s ‘so­cial li­cense’ to op­er­ate. In this re­gard, di­vest­ment is a highly ap­pro­pri­ate de­bate, and highly real­ity-based,” he said in an email.

Harp­er also said that ad­voc­ates agree with the im­per­at­ive of bring­ing en­ergy to na­tions where ac­cess is now lack­ing. “I be­lieve that these en­ergy needs must be met, to the greatest de­gree pos­sible, with clean, re­new­able en­ergy. The [Ex­xon] blog post does not reck­on with the fact that coal, oil, and gas com­bus­tion are re­spons­ible for a large num­ber of deaths an­nu­ally world­wide,” Harp­er said.

It’s not the first time Ex­xon has tussled with di­vest­ment ad­voc­ates.

In re­sponse to share­hold­er act­iv­ists, Ex­xon re­leased a re­port in late March that re­buts ad­voc­ates’ claims that its fossil fuel re­serves are at risk of be­com­ing “stran­ded as­sets” in a car­bon-con­strained world.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP’S ATTORNEY WAS SET TO TESTIFY ON WEDNESDAY
Senate Intel Postpones Testimony by Cohen
16 hours ago
THE LATEST
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
INTERVIEWED BY COMMITTEE STAFF
Lewandowski Meets with Senate Intelligence Committee
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski appeared on Capitol Hill for a closed-door interview with the Senate intelligence committee Wednesday, according to a source familiar with the matter. Lewandowski is the latest senior official in Trump's orbit who has met with the committee as part of its investigation into Russian election meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign."

Source:
FISHING EXPEDITION
Some Members Seek to Wrap Up Russia Investigations by Year’s End
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"A growing number of key Republicans are sending this message to the leaders of the congressional committees investigating potential Trump campaign collusion with the Russians: Wrap it up soon. In the House and Senate, several Republicans who sit on key committees are starting to grumble that the investigations have spanned the better part of the past nine months, contending that the Democratic push to extend the investigation well into next year could amount to a fishing expedition."

Source:
WROTE LAW THAT WEAKENED OPIOID OVERSIGHT
Trump: Marino Withdrawing Nomination for Drug Czar
3 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login