Rand Paul’s Vaccine Problem

He and Chris Christie are trying to have it both ways.

"Calm down a bit here, Kelly."
National Journal
Feb. 2, 2015, 1:22 p.m.

Sen. Rand Paul thinks vac­cines are great. But that doesn’t mean he thinks people should have to use them.

Ap­pear­ing on CN­BC on Monday, Paul doubled down on com­ments he made to Laura In­gra­ham earli­er in the day say­ing that he thinks vac­cine use is a “per­son­al de­cision.”

“I think vac­cines are one of the greatest med­ic­al break­throughs that we have,” Paul told CN­BC’s Kelly Evans Monday even­ing. “I’m a big fan and a great fan of the his­tory of the de­vel­op­ment of the small­pox vac­cine, for ex­ample. But you know, for most of our his­tory, they have been vol­un­tary. So I don’t think I’m ar­guing for any­thing out of the or­din­ary. We are ar­guing for what most of our his­tory has had.”

By mak­ing this ar­gu­ment in the midst of a measles re­sur­gence, both Paul and New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie are try­ing to have it both ways: to em­phas­ize that, no, they would nev­er dis­pute the sci­ence be­hind vac­cines, while at the same time wink­ing at anti-vaxxers who put a premi­um on hav­ing the choice to not vac­cin­ate their kids.

Un­sur­pris­ingly, the over­all tone of Paul’s CN­BC in­ter­view was fairly com­bat­ive — at one point, while dis­cuss­ing something else, Paul held a fin­ger up to his mouth and lit­er­ally shushed Evans. The two main points of Paul’s ar­gu­ment per­tained to new­born safety and his­tor­ic­al pre­ced­ent — two factors that are not as rel­ev­ant to the vac­cin­a­tion de­bate as they may seem.

Here is Paul’s full reas­on­ing for why he op­poses man­dat­ory vac­cin­a­tion:

“I don’t think there is any­thing ex­traordin­ary about re­sort­ing to free­dom. I’ll give you a good ex­ample. The Hep­at­it­is B vac­cine is now giv­en to new­borns. We some­times give five and six vac­cines all at one time. I chose to have my delayed. I don’t want the gov­ern­ment telling me that I have to give my new­born Hep­at­it­is B vac­cine, which is trans­mit­ted by sexu­ally trans­mit­ted dis­ease and/or blood trans­fu­sions. Do I ul­ti­mately think it is a good idea? Yeah. And so I had my staggered over sev­er­al months. I have heard of many tra­gic cases of walk­ing, talk­ing nor­mal chil­dren who wound up with pro­found men­tal dis­orders after vac­cines. I’m not ar­guing vac­cines are a bad idea. I think they are a good thing, but I think the par­ent should have some in­put. The state doesn’t own your chil­dren. Par­ents own the chil­dren. And it is an is­sue of free­dom and pub­lic health.”

The case against new­born vac­cin­a­tions is a fa­mil­i­ar ar­gu­ment, and one that Paul’s fath­er, Ron Paul, has made be­fore. In 2007, the eld­er Paul ar­gued that “bunch­ing” vac­cines to­geth­er can be dan­ger­ous for in­fants’ health.

“I think the doc­tors have got­ten to the point where they give too many, too of­ten,” Ron Paul said at the time. “They bunch ‘em to­geth­er — four, five of these vac­cines to­geth­er — and they over­whelm the im­mune sys­tem.”

That claim simply does not stand up to scru­tiny. “Nu­mer­ous stud­ies have found no link between get­ting the re­com­men­ded sched­ule of vac­cines and get­ting oth­er dis­eases later in child­hood,” Pop­u­lar Sci­ence re­por­ted. “There’s no cred­ible sci­entif­ic evid­ence that vac­cines are able to “over­load” ba­bies’ im­mune sys­tems. Though im­ma­ture, ba­bies’ sys­tems are pre­pared to handle vac­cines. They already handle nu­mer­ous vir­uses and bac­teria all around them in every­day life.”

The his­tor­ic­al po­s­i­tion­ing would hold more weight, ex­cept for the fact that the anti-vac­cin­a­tion move­ment is a his­tor­ic­al an­om­aly; op­pos­i­tion to­ward what was, un­til re­cently, a total non­is­sue in pub­lic health. And it’s not just per­son­al choice, but laws that af­fect com­pli­ance. An In­sti­tute of Medi­cine study found that in 2011, states with more le­ni­ent vac­cin­a­tion policies saw a 90 per­cent high­er in­cid­ence of whoop­ing cough.

The case of vac­cin­a­tion poses a com­pel­ling philo­soph­ic­al ques­tion for the Re­pub­lic­an Party; it per­fectly cap­tures the ten­sion between the per­son­al freedoms Re­pub­lic­ans cher­ish and the col­lect­ive good they, like any­one, want to up­hold. It’s a mi­cro­cosm of the val­ues that Re­pub­lic­ans must re­con­cile with­in them­selves, and with­in their party.

Up­date: Paul re­leased a state­ment Tues­day push­ing back against crit­ics.

“I did not say vac­cines caused dis­orders, just that they were tem­por­ally re­lated — I did not al­lege caus­a­tion,” Paul said in the state­ment. “I sup­port vac­cines, I re­ceive them my­self and I had all of my chil­dren vac­cin­ated. In fact today, I re­ceived the boost­er shot for the vac­cines I got when I went to Guatem­ala last year.”

What We're Following See More »
BREAKING WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AFTER TRUMP INSULTED THE SENATOR
McCain Family to Endorse Biden
49 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"The late Sen. John McCain's family plans to support former Vice President Joe Biden's White House bid, backing the Democrat not only in his party's crowded primary race but also in a general election matchup with President Trump, the Washington Examiner has learned. In an extraordinary snub to Trump, who derided McCain's Vietnam War service and mocked him even after his death last August at age 81, the McCain family is preparing to break with the Republican Party. McCain represented the party in Congress for 35 years and was chosen as its presidential nominee in 2008, losing to Barack Obama."

Source:
LEGAL BATTLE BETWEEN THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS LOOMS
IRS Resists Giving Congress Trump's Tax Returns
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin left little doubt Tuesday that the administration will reject a congressional request for President Donald Trump's tax returns by a self-imposed May 6 target for a "final decision," setting the stage for a legal battle that will test the limits of congressional oversight."

Source:
CALLS CONGRESS "VERY PARTISAN"
Trump Opposes White House Aides Giving Congressional Testimony
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Trump on Tuesday said he is opposed to current and former White House aides providing testimony to congressional panels in the wake of the special counsel report, intensifying a power struggle between his administration and House Democrats. In an interview with The Washington Post, Trump said that complying with congressional requests was unnecessary after the White House cooperated with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of Russian interference and the president’s own conduct in office."

Source:
GAG RULE WOULD HAVE KEPT CLINICS FROM REFERRING WOMEN TO ABORTION PROVIDERS
Judge Blocks Trump Abortion Rule
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"U.S. District Judge Michael J. McShane late Tuesday said he’ll grant a preliminary injunction against new federal restrictions that bar taxpayer-funded family planning clinics from referring patients to abortion providers, calling the rule a 'ham-fisted approach to public health policy.' Oregon is one of 20 states and the District of Columbia that challenged the Trump administration’s changes to the Title X family planning program in U.S. District Court in Oregon, along with Planned Parenthood affiliates and the American Medical Association."

Source:
WANTS IT BY MAY 1
Nadler Subpoenas Unredacted Report
5 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login