Laura Ingraham: Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton Should Run on the Same Ticket

The conservative radio host threw considerable shade at Bush ahead of his CPAC speech.

Radio host Laura Ingraham speaks at the Freedom Summit at The Executive Court Banquet Facility April 12, 2014 in Manchester, New Hampshire.
National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
Feb. 27, 2015, 4:10 a.m.

Jeb Bush will speak at the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence this af­ter­noon. But Laura In­gra­ham wasn’t go­ing to let him have an easy wel­come.

In her speech Fri­day morn­ing, the con­ser­vat­ive talk-show host opened with a warn­ing shot at Bush, ask­ing at­tendees to raise their hands if they were skep­tic­al of an­oth­er Bush pres­id­ency. The crowd ap­plauded.

“Jeb and Hil­lary could run on the same tick­et,” In­gra­ham con­tin­ued. “The idea that we should con­duct any kind of coron­a­tion … be­cause 50 rich fam­il­ies de­cide who will best de­cide their in­terests? No way, Jose.”

She went on to jab at Bush for a re­cent Wash­ing­ton Post story doc­u­ment­ing the plush spend­ing habits of his wife, Columba Bush. In­gra­ham joked that Bush’s mar­riage could help him ap­peal to wo­men voters. “What wo­man doesn’t love a man who gives her a blank check at Tiffany’s?” In­gra­ham said.

She also cri­ti­cized Bush for think­ing “the Amer­ic­an work­er is lazy” and that “we should re­pop­u­late De­troit with for­eign work­ers.”

In this way, In­gra­ham ex­pertly set the tone for the day at this large gath­er­ing of con­ser­vat­ives. That bore out later Fri­day morn­ing, when the crowd — largely made up of Rand Paul sup­port­ers ahead of his ap­pear­ance — loudly booed when Fox News‘ Sean Han­nity asked who in the crowd sup­por­ted Bush. Dur­ing her speech, In­gra­ham ap­pealed to the crowd while starkly re­mind­ing Bush that he won’t be able to simply show up and gain sup­port from the Re­pub­lic­an base.

“We don’t need a con­ser­vat­ive who comes to CPAC to check a box,” she said, say­ing that people come be­cause “they are con­ser­vat­ives.”

In­gra­ham also used her speech to bash me­dia out­lets that cri­ti­cized Gov. Scott Walk­er’s re­marks at CPAC on Thursday, in which he sug­ges­ted that tak­ing on thou­sands of pro-uni­on pro­test­ers in Wis­con­sin would pre­pare him for tak­ing on IS­IS. In­gra­ham said his crit­ics don’t have a sense of hu­mor.

Over­all, In­gra­ham gave per­haps the most full-throated de­fense of the con­ser­vat­ive move­ment at CPAC so far.

“For a mo­ment, don’t for­get where this move­ment came from. It came from men and wo­men who were told that con­ser­vat­ism was yes­ter­day’s news,” In­gra­ham said. “Con­ser­vat­ism is not dour or gloomy. We are an op­tim­ist­ic people. Don’t let any­one tell you oth­er­wise.”

This story was up­dated with de­tails from Sean Han­nity’s speech, and the re­sponse, later Fri­day morn­ing.

{{ BIZOBJ (slideshow: 890) }}

What We're Following See More »
TOOTHLESS?
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
29 minutes ago
THE LATEST
HAD SOUGHT INFO ON LOBBYISTS IN ADMINISTRATION
White House Snubs OGE’s Request for Info on Waivers
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."

Source:
NIKKI HALEY HEADING FOR ANKARA
Turkey Summons U.S. Ambassador
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
THOMAS JOINS COURT’S LIBERALS
Court Rules Against NC Voting Districts, Says They Were Racially Motivated
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."

Source:
UNANIMOUS DECISION
SCOTUS Rules Against Venue Shopping in Patent Cases
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login