NSA Spying Wins Another Rubber Stamp

Mass surveillance will continue for now, but is set to expire on June 1—unless Congress acts.

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Feb. 27, 2015, 12:38 p.m.

A fed­er­al court has again re­newed an or­der al­low­ing the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency to con­tin­ue its bulk col­lec­tion of Amer­ic­ans’ phone re­cords, a de­cision that comes more than a year after Pres­id­ent Obama pledged to end the con­tro­ver­sial pro­gram.

The For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court ap­proved this week a gov­ern­ment re­quest to keep the NSA’s mass sur­veil­lance of U.S. phone metadata op­er­at­ing un­til June 1, co­in­cid­ing with when the leg­al au­thor­ity for the pro­gram is set to ex­pire in Con­gress.

The ex­ten­sion is the fifth of its kind since Obama said he would ef­fect­ively end the Snowden-ex­posed pro­gram as it cur­rently ex­ists dur­ing a ma­jor policy speech in Janu­ary 2014. Obama and seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials have re­peatedly in­sisted that they will not act alone to end the pro­gram without Con­gress.

“While the ad­min­is­tra­tion waits for the Con­gress to act, it has con­tin­ued to op­er­ate the pro­gram with … im­port­ant modi­fic­a­tions in place,” White House press sec­ret­ary Josh Earn­est said in a state­ment re­leased late Fri­day.

More than a year’s worth of ef­forts to re­form the NSA stalled last year, as the Sen­ate came two votes short of ad­van­cing the USA Free­dom Act in Novem­ber. The meas­ure failed to over­come a fili­buster by Re­pub­lic­ans, many of whom warned any lim­it­a­tion im­posed on the NSA could bol­ster ter­ror­ist groups like the Is­lam­ic State.

It is widely ex­pec­ted that law­makers will re­in­tro­duce ver­sions of the Free­dom Act in the new Con­gress, but no bill has emerged so far. Core parts of the post-9/11 Pat­ri­ot Act will sun­set on June 1, in­clud­ing Sec­tion 215, which grants the NSA leg­al au­thor­ity to con­duct its con­tro­ver­sial drag­net sur­veil­lance pro­gram.

Amid the con­gres­sion­al in­ac­tion, the FISA Court has now re­newed the NSA’s most con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­gram five times — in March, June, Septem­ber, Decem­ber and now Feb­ru­ary — since Obama de­livered his pledge to end it in its cur­rent form.

“Con­gress has a lim­ited win­dow be­fore the June 1 sun­set to en­act le­gis­la­tion that would im­ple­ment the Pres­id­ent’s pro­posed path for­ward for the tele­phony metadata pro­gram, while pre­serving key in­tel­li­gence au­thor­it­ies,” Earn­est said in his state­ment. “The ad­min­is­tra­tion con­tin­ues to stand ready to work with the Con­gress on such le­gis­la­tion and would wel­come the op­por­tun­ity to do so.”

Some NSA crit­ics and even some law­makers, such as Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Demo­crat on the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, have called for Obama to end the pro­gram uni­lat­er­ally.

The in­tel­li­gence com­munity, un­der Obama’s dir­ec­tion, has im­ple­men­ted some changes to how it stores and col­lects U.S. and for­eign com­mu­nic­a­tions data, but pri­vacy ad­voc­ates have re­peatedly in­sisted those tweaks are not enough.

It re­mains un­clear if there is a path for­ward for sub­stan­tial NSA re­form in Con­gress, leav­ing sur­veil­lance crit­ics to worry law­makers may ul­ti­mately pass a clean reau­thor­iz­a­tion of the Pat­ri­ot Act.

The gov­ern­ment is re­quired to seek reau­thor­iz­a­tion of its phone re­cords pro­gram every 90 days, though the most re­cent or­der sur­passes the 90-day lim­it by a few days in or­der to reach June 1.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login