Democrats: Boehner Promised Us a Vote on a Clean DHS Bill Next Week

Deal or no deal, House leadership will be tested next week.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi reads a letter she sent to her colleagues in Congress urging support for a DHS stopgap funding bill.
National Journal
Alex Brown
Feb. 28, 2015, 8:18 a.m.

House con­ser­vat­ives were told a shut­down-avert­ing vote last night bought them a week re­prieve to strategize a new fight against Pres­id­ent Obama’s im­mig­ra­tion or­ders. Demo­crats be­lieve they’ve been prom­ised a vote on a full-year fund­ing bill by next Fri­day.

A week from now, one of those groups is go­ing to be very dis­ap­poin­ted — and likely ir­ate at the de­cep­tion of its own lead­er­ship.

House Demo­crats voted en masse Fri­day for a one-week con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to fund the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment, just hours after band­ing to­geth­er to kill a three-week fund­ing meas­ure. Their votes switched at the ur­ging of House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, who told mem­bers they would soon get a vote on the Sen­ate-passed full fund­ing bill.

“Your vote to­night will as­sure that we will vote for full fund­ing next week,” she wrote in a let­ter to col­leagues. Just what is be­hind that as­sur­ance was left un­said, but Demo­crats be­lieve Pelosi ex­trac­ted a prom­ise from House Speak­er John Boehner for a vote on full fund­ing next week.

“I think what changed was there was a com­mit­ment giv­en that if we passed the one-week ex­ten­sion, they would agree next week to bring up the Sen­ate clean fund­ing for DHS, so I be­lieve there was an agree­ment that was made,” said Demo­crat­ic Rep. Janice Hahn. “We took [Re­pub­lic­ans] at their word, so I hope it’s true.”

Mul­tiple Demo­crat­ic aides con­firmed lead­er­ship had prom­ised their bosses a vote on the Sen­ate-passed full fund­ing bill next week. Two seni­or Demo­crat­ic staffers ad­ded that they had heard from both caucus lead­er­ship and the White House that Boehner had giv­en them an agree­ment to al­low that vote to take place.

Pelosi’s of­fice would not con­firm or deny a deal with Boehner.

Re­ports of such an agree­ment were vehe­mently denied by the speak­er’s of­fice. “No such deal or prom­ise was made,” said Boehner spokes­man Mi­chael Steel. Of course, con­firm­ing an ar­range­ment to give Demo­crats the clean vote they want would surely draw out­rage from Boehner’s right flank.

Wheth­er one lead­er is ly­ing to their caucus or the two mis­un­der­stood each oth­er, their re­spect­ive caucuses went to vote Fri­day with vastly dif­fer­ent ideas of what the next week would hold.

Even Demo­crats who were tight-lipped about wheth­er Pelosi had told them of a deal said they had read — and be­lieved — re­ports of the ar­range­ment. Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Pelosi ally, was among many in the caucus who said the minor­ity lead­er would not have switched course on short-term fund­ing without earn­ing the best deal she could. “This wouldn’t have been ac­cep­ted if that wasn’t go­ing to be the case,” she said.

Still, Pelosi’s strategy was not com­pletely without Demo­crat­ic skep­tics. “She also as­sured Demo­crats who she whipped to vote no this af­ter­noon that, in the event of the fail­ure of the three-week clean [con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion], Mr. Boehner would have ‘no choice’ but to bring up the Sen­ate bill to­night. How’d that work out?” said Rep. Gerry Con­nolly. He called the prom­ised deal “an aw­fully thin reed on which to de­cide to vote for a one-week ex­ten­sion after you whipped Demo­crats to vote against a three-week ex­ten­sion.”

Mean­while, Re­pub­lic­ans, who have surely read those same re­ports, will be closely watch­ing Boehner to see if he in­deed brings a full bill to the floor. They were told the one-week ex­ten­sion would buy them time to force a con­fer­ence with the Sen­ate on the full-year fund­ing bill, which they could then use to push for riders that would un­der­mine Obama’s im­mig­ra­tion or­ders. Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id has already said his caucus will block any such ef­forts.

If the con­fer­ence is in­deed blocked and the House votes on full fund­ing, it will surely pro­voke out­rage from con­ser­vat­ives who be­lieve Boehner’s plan was to cave all along. Even Fri­day, 55 Re­pub­lic­ans voted against the one-week meas­ure, with many say­ing any “clean” fund­ing that does not fight Obama on im­mig­ra­tion is a con­ces­sion they could not make.

And while the GOP’s dis­trust of its lead­er­ship is well-doc­u­mented, it’s less clear what will hap­pen if next week comes and goes without a vote on full fund­ing. Demo­crats took a tough vote to block a three-week fund­ing bill, only to turn around and ap­prove the short­er plan. Mem­bers be­lieved they were get­ting the vote they wanted in re­turn, and if that doesn’t ma­ter­i­al­ize, they will be look­ing for an­swers. Wheth­er they’ll con­clude Boehner lied to Pelosi — or that Pelosi misled them — is an open ques­tion, and one they’re hop­ing won’t have to be answered.

Rachel Roubein and Daniel Newhauser contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Grants 111 More Commutations
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a release Tuesday afternoon, the White House announced that President Obama has commuted and/or reduced the sentences of another 111 convicted criminals, mostly convicted of drug possession or trafficking. About 35 were serving life sentences.

BUT HE’S NOT ADVOCATING FOR IT
Grassley Open to Lame Duck Hearings on Garland
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said Monday he'd now be willing to hold a hearing on Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in a lame-duck session of Congress. While he said he wouldn't push for it, he said if "Hillary Clinton wins the White House, and a majority of senators convinced him to do so," he would soften his previous opposition.

Source:
DEFINITELY MAYBE
Rubio Can’t Guarantee He’ll Serve a Full Term
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

We can call this the anti-Sherman-esque statement: If reelected, Marco Rubio ... might serve his whole term. Or he might not. The senator, who initially said he wouldn't run for a second term this year, now tells CNN that if reelected, he wouldn't necessarily serve all six years. “No one can make that commitment because you don’t know what the future is gonna hold in your life, personally or politically,” he said, before adding that he's prepared to make his Senate seat the last political office he ever holds.

Source:
DUTERTE BECAME PRESIDENT IN JUNE
Obama to Raise Multiple Issues in Meeting With Philippines Prez
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Since Rodrigo Duterte took over as president of the Philippines in June, he has made a serious of controversial statements and launched a war on drugs that has led to nearly 2000 deaths. He called the US ambassador to the Philippines, Philip Goldberg, "a gay son of a bitch." Next week, President Obama will meet with President Duterte at the East Asia Summit in Laos, where he " will raise concerns about some of the recent statements from the president of the Philippines," according to White House Deputy National Security advisor Ben Rhodes.

Source:
LATE SEPTEMBER
Conservatives Preparing ‘Dry Run’ for Constitutional Convention
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Convention of States Project, which seeks to force a constitutional convention under Article V of the Constitution, will hold a "dry run" in Colonial Williamsburg starting Sept. 21. "Several states have already followed the process in Article V to endorse the convention." Thirty-four are required to call an actual convention. "The dry run in Williamsburg is meant to show how one would work and focus on the changes and potential constitutional amendments that would be proposed."

Source:
×