Democrats: Boehner Promised Us a Vote on a Clean DHS Bill Next Week

Deal or no deal, House leadership will be tested next week.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi reads a letter she sent to her colleagues in Congress urging support for a DHS stopgap funding bill.
National Journal
Alex Brown
Add to Briefcase
Alex Brown
Feb. 28, 2015, 8:18 a.m.

House con­ser­vat­ives were told a shut­down-avert­ing vote last night bought them a week re­prieve to strategize a new fight against Pres­id­ent Obama’s im­mig­ra­tion or­ders. Demo­crats be­lieve they’ve been prom­ised a vote on a full-year fund­ing bill by next Fri­day.

A week from now, one of those groups is go­ing to be very dis­ap­poin­ted — and likely ir­ate at the de­cep­tion of its own lead­er­ship.

House Demo­crats voted en masse Fri­day for a one-week con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to fund the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment, just hours after band­ing to­geth­er to kill a three-week fund­ing meas­ure. Their votes switched at the ur­ging of House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, who told mem­bers they would soon get a vote on the Sen­ate-passed full fund­ing bill.

“Your vote to­night will as­sure that we will vote for full fund­ing next week,” she wrote in a let­ter to col­leagues. Just what is be­hind that as­sur­ance was left un­said, but Demo­crats be­lieve Pelosi ex­trac­ted a prom­ise from House Speak­er John Boehner for a vote on full fund­ing next week.

“I think what changed was there was a com­mit­ment giv­en that if we passed the one-week ex­ten­sion, they would agree next week to bring up the Sen­ate clean fund­ing for DHS, so I be­lieve there was an agree­ment that was made,” said Demo­crat­ic Rep. Janice Hahn. “We took [Re­pub­lic­ans] at their word, so I hope it’s true.”

Mul­tiple Demo­crat­ic aides con­firmed lead­er­ship had prom­ised their bosses a vote on the Sen­ate-passed full fund­ing bill next week. Two seni­or Demo­crat­ic staffers ad­ded that they had heard from both caucus lead­er­ship and the White House that Boehner had giv­en them an agree­ment to al­low that vote to take place.

Pelosi’s of­fice would not con­firm or deny a deal with Boehner.

Re­ports of such an agree­ment were vehe­mently denied by the speak­er’s of­fice. “No such deal or prom­ise was made,” said Boehner spokes­man Mi­chael Steel. Of course, con­firm­ing an ar­range­ment to give Demo­crats the clean vote they want would surely draw out­rage from Boehner’s right flank.

Wheth­er one lead­er is ly­ing to their caucus or the two mis­un­der­stood each oth­er, their re­spect­ive caucuses went to vote Fri­day with vastly dif­fer­ent ideas of what the next week would hold.

Even Demo­crats who were tight-lipped about wheth­er Pelosi had told them of a deal said they had read — and be­lieved — re­ports of the ar­range­ment. Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Pelosi ally, was among many in the caucus who said the minor­ity lead­er would not have switched course on short-term fund­ing without earn­ing the best deal she could. “This wouldn’t have been ac­cep­ted if that wasn’t go­ing to be the case,” she said.

Still, Pelosi’s strategy was not com­pletely without Demo­crat­ic skep­tics. “She also as­sured Demo­crats who she whipped to vote no this af­ter­noon that, in the event of the fail­ure of the three-week clean [con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion], Mr. Boehner would have ‘no choice’ but to bring up the Sen­ate bill to­night. How’d that work out?” said Rep. Gerry Con­nolly. He called the prom­ised deal “an aw­fully thin reed on which to de­cide to vote for a one-week ex­ten­sion after you whipped Demo­crats to vote against a three-week ex­ten­sion.”

Mean­while, Re­pub­lic­ans, who have surely read those same re­ports, will be closely watch­ing Boehner to see if he in­deed brings a full bill to the floor. They were told the one-week ex­ten­sion would buy them time to force a con­fer­ence with the Sen­ate on the full-year fund­ing bill, which they could then use to push for riders that would un­der­mine Obama’s im­mig­ra­tion or­ders. Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id has already said his caucus will block any such ef­forts.

If the con­fer­ence is in­deed blocked and the House votes on full fund­ing, it will surely pro­voke out­rage from con­ser­vat­ives who be­lieve Boehner’s plan was to cave all along. Even Fri­day, 55 Re­pub­lic­ans voted against the one-week meas­ure, with many say­ing any “clean” fund­ing that does not fight Obama on im­mig­ra­tion is a con­ces­sion they could not make.

And while the GOP’s dis­trust of its lead­er­ship is well-doc­u­mented, it’s less clear what will hap­pen if next week comes and goes without a vote on full fund­ing. Demo­crats took a tough vote to block a three-week fund­ing bill, only to turn around and ap­prove the short­er plan. Mem­bers be­lieved they were get­ting the vote they wanted in re­turn, and if that doesn’t ma­ter­i­al­ize, they will be look­ing for an­swers. Wheth­er they’ll con­clude Boehner lied to Pelosi — or that Pelosi misled them — is an open ques­tion, and one they’re hop­ing won’t have to be answered.

Rachel Roubein and Daniel Newhauser contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
1 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
1 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login