Illinois GOP Finds an Anti-Schock to Replace Aaron Schock

Darin LaHood’s family is steeped in politics, and he championed ethics reform in the state legislature. But some conservatives are wary of him.

Aaron Schock interviewed in his office on Arpil 26, 2012.
National Journal
March 25, 2015, 1:28 p.m.

Illinois Re­pub­lic­ans may elect a me­dia-shy, eth­ics-fo­cused polit­ic­al scion as their new­est rep­res­ent­at­ive later this year—in oth­er words, the an­ti­thes­is of resign­ing Rep. Aaron Schock, the man be­ing re­placed. But con­ser­vat­ives aren’t all sold on state Sen. Dar­in La­Hood, either, partly be­cause of his fam­ily’s polit­ic­al his­tory.

La­Hood, whose fath­er rep­res­en­ted Illinois’s 18th Dis­trict for more than two dec­ades, has emerged as the early fa­vor­ite to take over from Schock after his os­ten­ta­tious spend­ing habits brought the con­gress­man down. La­Hood could scare off all oth­er ser­i­ous con­tenders be­cause in many ways, he looks like a per­fect fit for a post-scan­dal spe­cial elec­tion.

Start with his fam­ily ped­i­gree. Former Rep. Ray La­Hood, who served as Pres­id­ent Obama’s first Trans­port­a­tion sec­ret­ary, rep­res­en­ted the Pe­or­ia-based dis­trict in un­der­stated fash­ion for more than a dec­ade, a sharp con­trast to the jet-set­ting, big-spend­ing life­style Schock show­cased on In­s­tagram. Be­fore Schock even an­nounced he would resign, Pe­or­ia’s Journ­al Star ed­it­or­i­al board noted that “these eth­ic­al ques­tions nev­er came up with” his pre­de­cessor.

Then there’s La­Hood the young­er’s for­tu­it­ous fo­cus on eth­ics re­form in the state le­gis­lature. La­Hood didn’t have much suc­cess, but it puts him in a per­fect po­s­i­tion to draw a con­trast with Schock, said state Sen. Jason Barick­man, a Re­pub­lic­an col­league who con­sidered but de­cided against a bid for Schock’s seat.

“He’s been out­spoken in call­ing for those re­forms,” Barick­man said. “This is an is­sue that po­ten­tially could dis­tin­guish Dar­in from oth­er can­did­ates.”

But La­Hood’s fa­mili­al and polit­ic­al leg­acy has a down­side, too, which liber­tari­an-lean­ing GOP polit­ic­al op­er­at­ive Mike Flynn said should come up dur­ing the cam­paign.

Al­though Dar­in La­Hood has es­tab­lished a re­l­at­ively con­ser­vat­ive re­cord in the state Sen­ate, his fath­er was a con­sist­ent mod­er­ate. He was one of only three Re­pub­lic­ans to re­fuse to sign then-House Speak­er Newt Gin­grich’s Con­tract with Amer­ica when he first ran for of­fice in 1994, and at the end of his time in the House, be­fore he joined Pres­id­ent Obama’s Cab­in­et, the Club for Growth’s score­card gave Ray La­Hood a life­time score of 36 per­cent.

Flynn, who is con­sid­er­ing run­ning for against Dar­in La­Hood, also noted that his status as the son of a law­maker and bur­eau­crat might not sit well with voters who saw Schock grow out of touch and who want a more down-to-Earth re­place­ment.

“His fath­er was a chief of staff in Con­gress forever, and then was in Con­gress forever,” Flynn said. “It’s like they live in the polit­ic­al world without any con­nec­tion to the real world.”

La­Hood’s of­fice de­clined to set up an in­ter­view and did not re­spond to ques­tions on what his fath­er’s leg­acy would mean in the race. Spokes­wo­man Kar­en Dis­har­oon de­fen­ded his le­gis­lat­ive re­cord in an emailed state­ment.

La­Hood “is dom­in­at­ing the polls be­cause con­ser­vat­ives are en­er­gized for him be­cause he fights for term lim­its, cut­ting gov­ern­ment spend­ing, and lower taxes,” she said. “As a former fed­er­al pro­sec­utor, he’s uniquely po­si­tioned to crack down on the D.C. spe­cial in­terests and lead the charge for eth­ics re­forms and trans­par­ency.”

And even po­ten­tial op­pon­ents ad­mit La­Hood’s strengths. Flynn said he’s def­in­itely a safer op­tion than Schock. “He is much more “¦ what you en­vi­sion of a politi­cian,” Flynn said.

“He does have high name re­cog­ni­tion. He has a lot of points in his fa­vor,” said state Rep. Dan Brady, an­oth­er po­ten­tial can­did­ate. Brady vo­lun­teered for Ray La­Hood’s cam­paign in the 1990s.

But La­Hood’s gov­ern­ment leg­acy will be a tar­get in the spe­cial elec­tion. At­tor­ney Mike Za­l­c­man, a GOP can­did­ate who waged an un­suc­cess­ful state House cam­paign in 2014 and is a long shot to make an im­pact on the con­gres­sion­al race, said he plans on fo­cus­ing his cam­paign on cri­ti­ciz­ing La­Hood’s priv­ileged po­s­i­tion in the party hier­archy.

“The red car­pet’s cer­tainly been rolled out for him,” Za­l­c­man said.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login