House GOP Looks to Bring Back Late-Term Abortion Bill

Negotiations are underway to change the measure and bring it back to the floor, but there’s no deal yet.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 24: U.S. Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC) speaks during a hearing on implementation of the Affordable Care Act before the House Energy and Commerce Committee October 24, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Developers who helped to build the website for people to buy health insurance under Obamacare testified before the panel on what had gone wrong to cause the technical difficulties in accessing the site. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Daniel Newhauser
Add to Briefcase
Daniel Newhauser
April 14, 2015, 3:15 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are look­ing to breathe new life in­to an an­ti­abor­tion bill that was pulled from House con­sid­er­a­tion earli­er this year over con­cerns that it was in­sens­it­ive to wo­men who be­come preg­nant as a res­ult of rape.

But find­ing a com­prom­ise will be dif­fi­cult, and in a sign of just how sens­it­ive the is­sue is, two camps in­volved in the ne­go­ti­ations are already on sep­ar­ate pages about what the bill’s re­write will look like.

Many House Re­pub­lic­an wo­men strongly ob­jec­ted to the bill when it came up in Janu­ary over a pro­vi­sion that re­quired wo­men to have re­por­ted a rape to law en­force­ment in or­der to be eli­gible for a late-term abor­tion. Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers’ hand­ling of the bill and their de­cision to pull it from the floor were seen as signs that they were strug­gling to gov­ern their his­tor­ic­ally large ma­jor­ity.

Now, one of the con­gress­wo­men in­stru­ment­al in scut­tling the bill says that she was shown a draft two weeks ago that she could sup­port.

“If it is brought up for a vote, I be­lieve as it stands right now “¦ I am in sup­port of it,” said Rep. Ren­ee Ellmers, chair­wo­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Wo­men’s Policy Com­mit­tee.

Ellmers said that in­stead of a re­quire­ment that rape vic­tims re­port the crime to law en­force­ment, the ver­sion she saw would man­date that the wo­man must in­form the doc­tor per­form­ing the abor­tion that she was raped in or­der to be eli­gible for a late-term abor­tion.

“The de­mand that it be re­por­ted to law en­force­ment was com­pletely un­real­ist­ic and only fur­ther vic­tim­ized the vic­tims of rape, and I think that’s something that we have to be very con­scien­tious about,” Ellmers said.

Ellmers ad­ded that the new lan­guage cla­ri­fies ex­cep­tions in the case of in­cest as well. Pre­vi­ously, the bill al­lowed only minors who were vic­tims of in­cest to be eli­gible for late-term abor­tions. Now, the bill would open up the pro­ced­ure to any wo­men who be­come preg­nant as a res­ult of in­cest, no mat­ter the age, she said.

“In­cest is in­cest. There can’t really be a cutoff age,” Ellmers said. “That was, I thought, not well thought out.” Ellmers said she has not yet spoken with all House Re­pub­lic­an wo­men about the changes, but she hopes to do so soon.

The prob­lem, however, is that the bill’s chief spon­sor said the lan­guage he is craft­ing is not quite what Ellmers de­scribed.

“We con­tin­ue to search for lan­guage that will uni­fy the pro-life base,” Rep. Trent Franks said in a state­ment. “However it is com­pletely pre­ma­ture to say what that fi­nal lan­guage will be. With that said, the draft be­ing dis­cussed now dif­fers in sub­stant­ive ways from” Ellmers’ de­scrip­tion.

Franks and his staff de­clined, however, to spe­cify how his draft is dif­fer­ent.

It is un­clear when the bill will come up, but House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy said on Monday that he is com­mit­ted to bring­ing the bill back to the floor.

The bill was also dis­cussed in a Tues­day morn­ing meet­ing of the Val­ues Ac­tion Team, a group of an­ti­abor­tion le­gis­lat­ors, and mem­bers were left with the dis­tinct im­pres­sion that it would see floor con­sid­er­a­tion this year, ac­cord­ing to Rep. John Flem­ing, the group’s vice chair­man.

Still, it is not yet clear that an­ti­abor­tion out­side groups would ac­cept new lan­guage. The groups had op­posed changes to the bill when it was con­sidered in Janu­ary, which is one of the reas­ons it could not be salvaged at the time. And soften­ing the rape re­port­ing lan­guage could leave the bill too weak for some mem­bers. Flem­ing, for in­stance, said he be­lieves the re­port­ing re­quire­ment should be in the bill. “You leave a huge loop­hole,” he said. “All you’ve got to do is say, ‘I’ve been raped,’ and no ques­tions are asked.”

The bill would in­sti­tute a fed­er­al ban on abor­tions past the 20th week of preg­nancy, with ex­cep­tions for rape, in­cest, and the life of the moth­er, a policy that most House Re­pub­lic­ans do sup­port.

What We're Following See More »
“KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY”
Inspector General Report Found McCabe Lied To Investigators
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Justice Department inspector general referred its finding that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe repeatedly misled investigators who were examining a media disclosure to the top federal prosecutor in D.C. to determine whether McCabe should be charged with a crime." The referral occurred "after the inspector general concluded McCabe had lied to investigators or his own boss, then-FBI Director James B. Comey, on four occasions, three of them under oath." The referral does "not necessarily mean McCabe will be charge with a crime ... although the report alleged that one of McCabe’s lies 'was done knowingly and intentionally.'"

Source:
GOP APPOINTEES RULE AGAINST TRUMP
Court Rules Against Policy Punishing Sanctuary Cities
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

A federal appeals court in Chicago "upheld a nationwide injunction against making federal grant funding contingent on cooperation with immigration enforcement." The three Republican appointees ruled that the Trump administration "exceeded its legal authority in trying to implement the new conditions without approval from Congress ... One judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals panel, Reagan appointee Daniel Manion, said he would narrow the injunction solely to protect Chicago. However, the two other judges assigned to the case said the nationwide injunction appeared to be justified."

Source:
BUT PLEDGES TO HAVE A VOTE
Grassley Delays Markup of Protect-Mueller Bill
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley "decided Thursday to delay markup" on a bill to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller until next week. But he remains steadfast in his support for a committee vote, despite Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's "pledge to kill it" if it gets to the floor.

Source:
POTENTIAL CONTEMPT CHARGE
Nadler: Goodlatte Could Subpoena Rosenstein
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee says Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., is poised to subpoena the Justice Department for former FBI Director James Comey’s memos, which the agency so far has failed to produce. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., warned such a move puts Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in jeopardy of being placed in contempt of Congress and the special counsel investigation of being shut down prematurely."

Source:
NO NEW FUNDING INCLUDED
House Ag Committee Passes Farm Bill
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
"On a party-line vote, the House Agriculture Committee approved a five-year farm bill on Wednesday that tweaks the supports now in place—a promise of certainty, leaders said, during a period of low commodity prices and threats of a trade war with agriculture on the front line." The bill includes no new funding over the last farm bill.
Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login