Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other members of the Democratic caucus showed the White House they are not going to let trade legislation pass without a fight, after facing criticism from the president for their opposition.
On Tuesday, Obama criticized the progressive favorite over her oppositional stance on the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership, saying: “I love Elizabeth. We’re allies on a whole host of issues. But she’s wrong on this.” The statements were part of a larger split between the White House and Democrats in Congress over trade agreements and the way they’re being handled.
In a response Wednesday, Warren hit back at the White House in a statement on her website, saying that the administration has been conducting the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations out of the public eye.
“The administration says I’m wrong—that there’s nothing to worry about,” she wrote. “They say the deal is nearly done, and they are making a lot of promises about how the deal will affect workers, the environment, and human rights. Promises—but people like you can’t see the actual deal.”
Warren also hit the administration on its desire to pass Trade Promotion Authority, also known as “fast-track authority,” which would make trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership subject to an up-or-down vote, without the ability to amend.
“If most of the trade deal is good for the American economy, but there’s a provision hidden in the fine print that could help multinational corporations ship American jobs overseas or allow for watering down of environmental or labor rules, fast track would mean that Congress couldn’t write an amendment to fix it,” she wrote.
Warren had previously penned an op-ed in The Washington Post on TPP, saying one aspect of the trade deal could weaken labor and environmental standards, which led to the administration responding to the concerns raised. Then again, last month after a conference call about the same subject, the White House put out a fact sheet disputing Warren’s statements.
What We're Following See More »
"Special counsel Robert Mueller's interest in Jared Kushner has expanded beyond his contacts with Russia and now includes his efforts to secure financing for his company from foreign investors during the presidential transition, according to people familiar with the inquiry. This is the first indication that Mueller is exploring Kushner's discussions with potential non-Russian foreign investors, including in China." At issue specifically is his quest for financing help on the beleaguered 666 Fifth Avenue building.
The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."
"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."
"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "