House GOP Will Try Again on Late-Term Abortion Bill

A measure that was pulled after a revolt by Republican women will return with new language.

Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) listens during a news conference for the launch of the Congressional HIV/AIDS Caucus on Capitol Hill on September 15, 2011 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
May 8, 2015, 12:20 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans will vote this week on a con­tro­ver­sial bill to lim­it late-term abor­tions, tak­ing a second pass at le­gis­la­tion that was pulled from floor con­sid­er­a­tion this year over con­cerns that it was in­sens­it­ive to wo­men who be­come preg­nant as a res­ult of rape.

At the time, many House wo­men and mod­er­ates com­plained to GOP lead­ers about a pro­vi­sion re­quir­ing wo­men to re­port the rape to law en­force­ment of­fi­cials to be eli­gible for a late-term abor­tion. Pro­ponents of the bill, however, ar­gued that without the lan­guage, wo­men could falsely claim they were raped in or­der to get an abor­tion.

As a com­prom­ise, new lan­guage that will be re­vealed as soon as Monday will re­move the re­port­ing re­quire­ment and re­place it with a two-day wait­ing peri­od. Abor­tion pro­viders would have to en­sure the rape vic­tim re­ceives med­ic­al treat­ment or coun­sel­ing at least 48 hours pri­or to per­form­ing the pro­ced­ure a spokes­man for Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy.

(RE­LATED: A Look at Late-Term Abor­tions, State by State

Yet Mc­Carthy’s of­fice would not an­swer Fri­day wheth­er the lan­guage also in­cludes changes that some Con­gress­wo­men were seek­ing on abor­tions in the case of in­cest. The ori­gin­al bill only al­lowed minors who be­come preg­nant through in­cest to be eli­gible for a late-term abor­tion. Rep. Ren­ee Ellmers, who has been out­spoken in op­pos­i­tion to the rape re­port­ing re­quire­ment, told Na­tion­al Journ­al last month that she be­lieved the re­sur­rec­ted bill opened up the pro­ced­ure to wo­men of any age who be­come preg­nant as a res­ult of in­cest.

If that change is not in­cluded in the new bill, it is un­clear how it will be re­ceived by Ellmers and oth­er mem­bers who have been crit­ic­al of the ori­gin­al meas­ure. Ellmers was not avail­able for com­ment by press time.

Still, sev­er­al mem­bers lauded the changed le­gis­lat­ive text, in­clud­ing Reps. Di­ane Black, Vicky Hartz­ler, and the bill’s spon­sor, Rep. Trent Franks.

“I am so grate­ful to all who have worked so hard to craft lan­guage that will now unite the pro-life base in a pos­it­ive and ef­fect­ive way,” Franks said in a state­ment. “This pro­pos­al is sub­stan­tially stronger than the ori­gin­al bill, and it places the fo­cus back upon pro­tect­ing moth­ers and their in­no­cent little pain-cap­able ba­bies, from the be­gin­ning of the sixth month un­til birth.”

The bill is ex­pec­ted on the House floor Wed­nes­day, co­in­cid­ing with the two-year an­niversary of the con­vic­tion of Ker­mit Gos­nell, a Phil­adelphia doc­tor was found to have per­formed scores of il­leg­al late-term abor­tions un­der de­plor­able con­di­tions and killed at least three live-born ba­bies. Two days after his con­vic­tion, he was sen­tenced to life in pris­on.

To tie in­to the an­niversary, the bill in­cludes pro­vi­sions deal­ing with in­fants born alive dur­ing an abor­tion pro­ced­ure, an in­formed con­sent form for wo­men seek­ing late-term abor­tions, and a right of civil ac­tion against abor­tion pro­viders who do not fol­low the law, as first re­por­ted by The Weekly Stand­ard.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login