EXCLUSIVE: Former JET, Ebony Editor on Suspicion that Woman Passed for Black, Led NAACP Chapter

“It takes more than a haircut to be Black. It takes more than being married to a black man to be Black. You can be empathetic and respectful of a culture without appropriating and impersonating it.”

Former JET and Ebony editor questions motivation behind alleged impersonation by Rachel Dolezal of Spokane, Wash.
National Journal
Juleyka Lantigua-Williams
Add to Briefcase
Juleyka Lantigua-Williams
June 12, 2015, 5:47 a.m.

Last night, a loc­al Wash­ing­ton state tele­vi­sion sta­tion broke news that the city of Spokane has launched an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to Rachel Dolez­al, a loc­al wo­man who iden­ti­fied her­self as “Afric­an-Amer­ic­an” in an ap­plic­a­tion to serve on a com­mis­sion. Why would that prompt an in­vest­ig­a­tion? Be­cause Dolez­al is not Afric­an-Amer­ic­an; she’s white. What’s more, Dolez­al is pres­id­ent of Spokane’s loc­al NAACP chapter. The news that a wo­man was “passing” as black in­stantly went vir­al on so­cial me­dia, ig­nit­ing a heated de­bate about iden­tity, race, and cul­ture in the 21st cen­tury. Next Amer­ica asked former Jet and Ebony ed­it­or Mitzi Miller to weigh in on some of the key is­sues and ques­tions sur­round­ing this de­vel­op­ing story.

What was your ini­tial re­ac­tion to the al­leg­a­tions that Rachel Dolez­al passed her­self off as black?

My re­ac­tion was: This is where we are in 2015. Now we have moved from cul­tur­al ap­pro­pri­ation to try­ing to pass. There’s something wrong here. There’s no need to im­per­son­ate a black per­son to be em­path­et­ic. She has neg­ated all the work she ever did while at the NAACP by the rev­el­a­tion that she was mas­quer­ad­ing as a black wo­man. She could have ac­com­plished the same things by be­ing her­self and col­lab­or­at­ing in the ef­forts she be­lieved in. Her de­cep­tion cre­ates a ven­eer of false­hood that can­not eas­ily be re­moved.

Can a per­son claim to be black by as­so­ci­ation?

That’s ri­dicu­lous. Un­less you have a men­tal dis­order, there’s no way to wake up con­fused about your eth­nic iden­tity. Dolez­al as­sumed what she per­ceived as the iden­tity of a black wo­man with clear in­tent to live out a life that was for­eign and dif­fer­ent from her own. The fact that she as­so­ci­ated her­self with black people and mar­ried a black man does not jus­ti­fy her ac­tions in any way.

“Jet and Ebony read­ers will find it very iron­ic that this wo­man who was born with the in­her­ent priv­ileges that the rest of us are striv­ing for would choose to be on the side of the un­der­dog.”

In some of the im­ages of Dolez­al mak­ing the rounds on so­cial me­dia, she is seen with braids, hoop ear­rings, and very curly hair. What is your re­sponse?

She was very thor­ough in her in­doc­trin­a­tion—she wore braids, teased her hair in­to an Afro, wore curls. She cer­tainly ap­pro­pri­ated from vari­ous eras and styles that were as­so­ci­ated with black wo­men. So she did her re­search. The sad part is that it feels like the ul­ti­mate mock­ery. It takes more than a hair­cut to be black. It takes more than be­ing mar­ried to a black man to be black. You can be em­path­et­ic and re­spect­ful of a cul­ture without ap­pro­pri­at­ing and im­per­son­at­ing it. Im­per­son­a­tion is not flat­ter­ing in any way.

In light of the grow­ing in­flu­ence of cam­paigns like #Black­LivesMat­ter and #Say­Her­Name, which fight to make the struggles faced by Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans in this coun­try more vis­ible, what do you make of Rachel Dolez­al’s ac­tions?

I sus­pect there is something emo­tion­ally dam­aging that happened in her life that pushed her to identi­fy with any oth­er cul­ture be­side her own. And there’s something to be said about the fact that it was her par­ents that outed her. My ini­tial ques­tion was, why would her own fath­er take to the me­dia and em­bar­rass his child in the man­ner that he has? Do­ing this has thrust her in­to the na­tion­al spot­light and erased her en­tire life as she sought to live it.

As a journ­al­ist who helmed two pub­lic­a­tions aimed at an Afric­an-Amer­ic­an audi­ence, what do you think the read­ers of Jet and Ebony might be think­ing as they learn about Dolez­al?

I think people of col­or are go­ing to find it very in­ter­est­ing. With everything go­ing on right now, with all the at­tacks on black chil­dren and black wo­men, there’s a palp­able ant­ag­on­ism against people of col­or in this coun­try. Jet and Ebony read­ers will find it very iron­ic that this wo­man who was born with the in­her­ent priv­ileges that the rest of us are striv­ing for would choose to be on the side of the un­der­dog. It’s ri­dicu­lous and iron­ic. Again, I go back to the sus­pi­cion that something was really messed up in her life and she had to find a way to cope. Ad­opt­ing an­oth­er iden­tity and cre­at­ing a life out of it was her an­swer.

Do you think her ac­tions taint the leg­acy of the NAACP’s work?

No. I don’t think any­thing she has done is im­port­ant enough. No single per­son can taint the leg­acy of an en­tire people’s struggle that stretches back through his­tory.

What do you think the NAACP should do?

They were lied to. To my know­ledge, they did not re­cruit her. Like any oth­er or­gan­iz­a­tion that is lied to by one of their rep­res­ent­at­ives, I’m sure they will take ap­pro­pri­ate ac­tion.

Should she apo­lo­gize? To whom?

Who is she apo­lo­giz­ing to? This is the way that she at­temp­ted to live her life. She chose to live a lie. I don’t think any­one was hurt by her choos­ing to rep­res­ent her­self as black. The losers here are her and her fam­ily be­cause they will have a hard time mov­ing on from this. Will she for­give her fath­er for out­ing her? And will they for­give her for deny­ing that she be­longs to them?

What We're Following See More »
ONLY 14 NO VOTES
House Approves Opioid Package
0 minute ago
THE DETAILS

"The House on Friday overwhelmingly passed sweeping bipartisan opioid legislation, concluding the chamber’s two-week voteathon on dozens of bills to address the drug abuse epidemic. The measure combines more than 50 bills approved individually by the House focusing on expanding access to treatment, encouraging the development of alternative pain treatments and curbing the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. It was passed 396-14, with 13 Republicans and one Democrat voting against the package."

Source:
NEVERMIND THE TWEETS
Trump Tells Congress North Korea Remains a Threat
22 minutes ago
THE LATEST

In a letter to Congress on Friday, President Trump wrote that he's continuing the national emergency status with respect to North Korea, citing the country's “provocative, destabilizing, and repressive actions," which "continue to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat” to the United States. In a series of tweets following his meeting with Kim Jong-un, Trump said Americans could sleep well at night because North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat.

Source:
ZERO-TOLERANCE FALLOUT CONTINUES
Navy Document Outlines Plans For Detention Camps
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Navy is preparing plans to construct sprawling detention centers for tens of thousands of immigrants on remote bases in California, Alabama and Arizona, escalating the military’s task in implementing President Donald Trump’s 'zero tolerance' policy for people caught crossing the Southern border." The document outlines plans for "temporary and austere" internment camps for 25,000 migrants "at abandoned airfields just outside the Florida panhandle," and in Alabama, for 47,000 people near San Francisco, and "as many as 47,000 people at Camp Pendleton" in California. The document estimates that operating a camp to detain 25,000 people for six months would cost approximately $233 million.

Source:
LASERS USED IN DJIBOUTI TOO
U.S. Military Aircraft Targeted By Lasers
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Lasers have targeted pilots of American military aircraft operating over the western Pacific Ocean more than 20 times in recent months," said U.S. officials. The lasers appeared to be coming from Chinese fishing boats in the South China Sea, said the officials, which is the setting of a "long-running dispute between China and Japan over the control of nearby islands ... The incidents likely will come up as part of a broader discussion of issues when Defense Secretary Jim Mattis visits Beijing next week and meets Chinese President Xi Jinping."

Source:
EMPHASIZES SECURITY AND JOBS
Trump Overturns Obama Orders on Oceans
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump has unveiled a new policy that depicts the world’s oceans as a resource ripe for expanded business opportunities, reversing the Obama administration's emphasis on protecting 'vulnerable' marine environments." Rather than emphasizing environmental protection, as Obama's policy did, "Trump’s directive speaks mostly to the oceans as a resource for promoting national security" and creating jobs.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login