Redistributing Wealth, a How-to Guide

Inequality: What can be done?

Inequality: What Can Be Done? by Anthony B. Atkinson.
National Journal
June 26, 2015, 1:01 a.m.

In­equal­ity: What Can Be Done?

by An­thony B. Atkin­son, Har­vard Uni­versity Press

WHAT IT’S ABOUT

(Har­vard Uni­versity Press)If a gov­ern­ment is ser­i­ous about ad­dress­ing eco­nom­ic in­equal­ity, says Atkin­son, there are a lot of things it can do. Past peri­ods of re­l­at­ive equal­ity in the United King­dom and oth­er de­veloped coun­tries were shaped by tax and trans­fer policy and pub­lic-in­vest­ment de­cisions—and those tools could be used suc­cess­fully again if the polit­ic­al will were there. Atkin­son, a Brit­ish eco­nom­ist, lays out 15 pro­pos­als for mov­ing the dis­tri­bu­tion of wealth back to­ward what it was in the more eco­nom­ic­ally equit­able 1950s and 1960s. (He fo­cuses on the United King­dom, but his ideas could be ap­plied in the United States as well.) He ad­mits up front that many of his sug­ges­tions are rad­ic­al: They in­clude rais­ing the top tax rate to 65 per­cent (the top mar­gin­al tax rate on earned in­come in the United States av­er­aged 75 per­cent from 1950 to 1979; it’s now about 40 per­cent) and provid­ing a sum of money (what he calls a “min­im­um in­her­it­ance”) to all cit­izens when they reach adult­hood.

TAR­GET D.C. AUDI­ENCE

Tax-policy wonks; eco­nom­ists; think tanks; fans of Thomas Piketty and Bernie Sanders; Eng­lish ma­jors (they’ll get a kick out of Atkin­son’s lit­er­ary ref­er­ences).

BEST LINE

“Com­pet­it­ive equal­ity of op­por­tun­ity means only that we all have an equal chance to take part in a race “¦ where there are un­equal prizes.”

TO BE SURE

Atkin­son starts with the premise that in­equal­ity is bad for so­ci­ety, and he goes to some lengths to ex­plain why he thinks so. But there are eco­nom­ists who dis­agree and who would ar­gue that the heavy-handed policies Atkin­son de­scribes would be fin­an­cially un­sus­tain­able and would hurt the eco­nomy in the long run.

ONE LEVEL DEEP­ER

Lib­er­al policy wonks will want to turn dir­ectly to Part 2, where Atkin­son lays out his pro­pos­als in de­tail. Their con­ser­vat­ive coun­ter­parts may want to do the same, for a bit of op­pos­i­tion re­search at the idea level. See: Atkin­son’s no­tion of a glob­al body for tax­ing the rich, no mat­ter where they live or keep their wealth.

THE BIG TAKEAWAY

Al­though tech­no­lo­gic­al change and glob­al­iz­a­tion are of­ten blamed for rising in­equal­ity, gov­ern­ment policy and so­cial norms—such as CEO pay scales—also strongly in­flu­ence the dis­tri­bu­tion of wealth.

What We're Following See More »
$19B INCLUDES NO IMMIGRATION-RELATED MONEY
Congress, White House Reach Disaster Aid Deal
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
OFFERED $16M IN LOANS FOR ADMINISTRATION JOB
Banker Indicted in New York for Bribery Scheme with Manafort
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
ANOTHER FIVE YEARS
Modi Wins Reelection as India's PM
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS
FAMILY WILL JOIN HIM
Trump Headed to UK Next Month
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T BLOCK SUBPOENA OF BANK RECORDS
Trump Loses in Court Again
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login