Mockery Isn’t Fixing This

We can’t bully our way to gun control.

Dec. 3, 2015, 9:20 a.m.

Mock­ery isn’t fix­ing this.

As a sup­port­er of stronger gun con­trol, this New York Daily News cov­er and the re­lated #God­Isn’tFix­ingThis Twit­ter storm make me wince. Only people who agree with me can pray for vic­tims of gun vi­ol­ence?

In the story that in­spired the cov­er, Rich Scha­piro con­trasts the re­sponses of pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates to the shoot­ings in San Bern­ardino, Cali­for­nia, that left 14 dead. Demo­crats called for stricter gun-con­trol laws and the GOP can­did­ates did not. “In­stead,” Scha­piro wrote, “the Re­pub­lic­ans were preach­ing about pray­er.”

He’s fac­tu­ally, if only nar­rowly, cor­rect. In my opin­ion, Scha­piro also is on right on policy: When mass shoot­ings be­come, stat­ist­ic­ally, a daily oc­cur­rence, reg­u­lat­ing the pub­lic’s ac­cess to guns is not only re­spons­ible, it’s con­sti­tu­tion­al.

Polit­ic­al lead­ers who do noth­ing about this scourge must be held ac­count­able. So why does the Daily News cov­er make me wince?

First, Re­pub­lic­ans are do­ing more than pray­ing. They’re not do­ing nearly enough, from my vant­age point, but if we’re go­ing to move bey­ond verbal wars and ac­tu­ally start fix­ing this prob­lem, the first step is to ac­know­ledge the oth­er side’s point of view. Un­der­stand it. Re­spect it. Then ex­ploit it.

For ex­ample, couldn’t a smart group of gun-con­trol ad­voc­ates seize on the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation’s talk­ing point about men­tal health and work to­ward ma­jor re­forms of the U.S. sys­tem?

Polls show wide­spread sup­port, even among Re­pub­lic­ans, for small steps like clos­ing loop­holes that weak­en back­ground checks and al­low known ter­ror­ists to buy guns. Rather than sur­render to the NRA’s cyn­ic­al might, as Pres­id­ent Obama and Demo­crats did after the Sandy Hook shoot­ings, why not keep press­ing?

I re­fuse to be­lieve that for all of the smart and ded­ic­ated polit­ic­al strategists who sup­port com­mon-sense gun con­trol, there’s no way to build a move­ment that com­petes polit­ic­ally and cul­tur­ally with the NRA.

Which brings me to my second prob­lem with the Daily News cov­er. Not only does it at­tack GOP pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates (again, I’m all for that), it in­sults any­body who op­poses gun con­trol and de­means their sym­path­ies for the vic­tims. It mocks their pray­ers.

That’s no way to win a cul­ture war.

Think about it. Mock­ery is the last re­sort of an in­sec­ure per­son, usu­ally a bully, who can’t get his or her way through more gentle per­sua­sion. Read this para­graph from a story in the lib­er­al Huff­ing­ton Post on why chil­dren bully their peers.

We at­tack oth­ers in or­der to feel good, or at least be­little someone as a way of mak­ing ourselves look bet­ter; find­ing fault or put­ting them down makes us feel su­per­i­or. This tends to hap­pen more when we are down ourselves, as misery loves com­pany; feel bad your­self and you in­vari­ably find fault in oth­ers.

Nailed it. The shoot­ings in Par­is, Col­or­ado, and Cali­for­nia made me miser­able. I’m down on hu­man­ity today. Down on my na­tion, down on its lead­er­ship, and down on a large per­cent­age of my fel­low cit­izens who re­fuse to bal­ance our right to bear arms against our right to reg­u­late them.

Misery loves com­pany, so why not rail about the im­pot­ency of pray­er? Be­cause it doesn’t work. And un­til we start elect­ing lead­ers who work to­geth­er to solve big prob­lems, pray­er may be all we’ve got.

What We're Following See More »
8 SCHOOLS INCLUDING YALE, STANFORD, GEORGETOWN
Dept. of Education Opens Probe into College Admissions Scandal
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
HAD BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY
House Intel Postpones Testimony by Felix Sater
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
PASSED 420-0 IN THE HOUSE
McConnell Blocks Vote on Making Mueller Report Public
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
CITES "VERY CONCERNING DISCREPANCIES"
Nadler Intends to Call Barr to Testify
20 hours ago
THE LATEST
PICTURE IS CLOUDIER ON OBSTRUCTION
Mueller: No Evidence of Collusion
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr. The summary also said that the special counsel’s team lacked sufficient evidence to establish that President Trump illegally obstructed justice, but added that Mr. Mueller’s team stopped short of exonerating Mr. Trump." Read Barr's summary here.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login