Why You Shouldn’t Pay Attention to Hillary Clinton’s Massive 2016 Lead

The former secretary of State leads in a field of two candidates two years out. Sound familiar?

National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Jan. 30, 2014, 4:11 a.m.

There’s a new poll out Thursday morn­ing, and it con­firms what Wash­ing­ton pun­dits have talked about for months and years: Hil­lary Clin­ton leads the Demo­crat­ic field for pres­id­ent in 2016. Duh.

The head­line for the Wash­ing­ton Post story on the poll reads, “For 2016, Hil­lary Clin­ton has com­mand­ing lead over Demo­crats.” What the head­line doesn’t men­tion is that her lead is over two oth­er Demo­crats named in the poll: Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden and Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren of Mas­sachu­setts. None of the three has con­firmed 2016 pres­id­en­tial as­pir­a­tions.

Of course, Clin­ton leads the field. She is the most widely talked about “can­did­ate” for pres­id­ent in 2016. But she hasn’t an­nounced her can­did­acy, nor has she set up any com­mit­tees.

Does this sound fa­mil­i­ar?

Gal­lup took a sim­il­ar poll around the same time out from the 2008 elec­tion, in Feb­ru­ary 2006. Clin­ton again led the Demo­crat­ic field. She led over such even­tu­al non­can­did­ates as John Kerry, Al Gore, Mark Warner, and Russ Fein­gold. Even­tu­al can­did­ates John Ed­wards and Joe Biden were also in­cluded in the poll, though. Even­tu­al win­ner Barack Obama was not.

There is, however, an im­port­ant dif­fer­ence between the 2006 poll and the one re­leased Thursday: Today, Clin­ton’s lead is much wider. She led her nearest “op­pon­ent” in the 2006, Kerry, by 39 per­cent to 15 per­cent. In the latest Wash­ing­ton Post/ABC News poll, Clin­ton leads Biden 73 per­cent to 12 per­cent.

And that’s partly be­cause there are cur­rently few­er vi­able can­did­ates in the Demo­crat­ic field. Who else could run? Bey­ond the three lis­ted in the poll, one of whom — War­ren — has already “en­dorsed” Clin­ton for 2016, there aren’t many more Demo­crats out there who seem will­ing to run just yet. Demo­crat­ic gov­ernors like Mary­land’s Mar­tin O’Mal­ley, New York’s An­drew Cuomo, and Mas­sachu­setts’ Dev­al Patrick have not hin­ted at cam­paigns, and their po­ten­tial na­tion­al ap­peal is pretty ques­tion­able at this point.

There could be oth­er Demo­crats out there brave enough to stand up against the Clin­ton Ma­chine, one of whom is former Montana Gov. Bri­an Sch­weitzer. But it re­mains to be seen who else could join the field. And there is only so much time left.

So, we have yet an­oth­er poll that shows Clin­ton lead­ing the field. As Guy Cecil, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, joked Thursday morn­ing, “I love that old polit­ic­al ad­age: The only poll that counts is the one three years be­fore the elec­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×