Brannon Attacks Tillis, Tillis Attacks Hagan At GOP Debate

Hagan holds small leads over top GOP candidates in NYT/Kaiser poll.

Andrea Drusch
See more stories about...
Andrea Drusch
April 23, 2014, 7:25 a.m.

North Car­o­lina House Speak­er Thom Tillis (R) fo­cused Tues­day night’s de­bate at Dav­id­son Col­lege on at­tack­ing Sen. Kay Hagan (D) and Obama­care, while phys­i­cian Greg Bran­non (R) used the plat­form to dif­fer­en­ti­ate from Tillis in the crowded primary. Amer­ic­an Cross­roads-backed Tillis has a strong lead on the rest of the pack, but so far not enough to reach the 40 per­cent ne­ces­sary to avoid a run­off. 

Start­ing with the first ques­tion, Bran­non slammed Tillis as weak on is­sues in­clud­ing Obama­care and Com­mon Core. The two sparred heatedly over gun con­trol is­sues, while pas­tor Mark Har­ris (R) and nurse Heath­er Grant (R) stayed mostly above the fray. Tillis called the group “all good con­ser­vat­ives.”

Miss­ing from the de­bate was any men­tion of the con­tro­versy over Tillis’s former staffers, who his cam­paign says were “forced” to resign after in­ap­pro­pri­ate re­la­tion­ships with lob­by­ists. He doubled down on that claim fol­low­ing the de­bate. (The Char­lotte Ob­serv­er)

HAGAN HANGING ON. A New York Times/Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion poll finds Hagan polling just slightly ahead of Tillis, 42% to 40% with 12% un­de­cided. Against Bran­non, the res­ults were sim­il­ar, with Hagan up 41% to 39%, 14% un­de­cided. Hagan’s ap­prov­al and dis­ap­prov­al num­bers were both at 44% (April 8-15, 900 RVs, +/- 4.0%). (re­lease)

AT A CROSS­ROADS. Amer­ic­an Cross­roads is up with a new ad tout­ing Tillis as a true con­ser­vat­ive and proven tax cut­ter. It doesn’t dir­ectly men­tion Hagan and Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC’s ads re­gard­ing the staffers, but says Demo­crats will “say any­thing” to stop Tillis. 

{{third­PartyEmbed type:you­tube id:3b­TiD67BROQ}}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
17 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
18 hours ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.