The Affordable Care Act could reduce the number of full-time workers in the United States by 2 million in 2017 and 2.5 million in 2024, according to a new report from the Congressional Budget Office.
Congressional Republicans pounced on the report as proof that Obamacare is every bit the “job-killer” they promised it would be. But it’s not that simple.
The report says the reduction comes “almost entirely” from a decrease in the amount of time laborers choose to spend at work, rather than a substantial decline in the amount of work businesses are offering.
The law’s incentives and subsidies may give some workers less of a reason to work. Under the Affordable Care Act, individuals who earn up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level qualify for assistance to buy health insurance. Some may want to keep their hours down in order to qualify; others may see the subsidized coverage as an opportunity to reduce their hours for other reasons.
The estimate of the effect of the law on the workforce, which was part of a regular update of the nonpartisan CBO’s 10-year budget and economic outlook released Tuesday, was a significant departure from earlier estimates. Previously, the CBO estimated that Obamacare would reduce household employment by 800,000 in 2021. According to the new report, employment would fall by 2.3 million that year. The report only covered the years 2014 to 2024, but the agency said the employment effects would likely continue after that time period.
Caveats aside, the new figures were fodder for a fresh round of Republican attacks on the health reform law. Congressional Republicans have sought to repeal or alter the Affordable Care Act since its passage in 2010; among the criticisms most frequently directed toward the law is that it will drive up costs for businesses and hurt job creation.
“The middle class is getting squeezed in this economy, and this CBO report confirms that Obamacare is making it worse,” House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a statement.
Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, referred to the report as “terrible news” in a separate statement. “A direct threat to the long-term health and prosperity of our nation, this law must be repealed,” Hatch said.
Both CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf and the White House cautioned that the new figures should be interpreted carefully. The White House focused on the employee choice aspect. “That is different from saying … the employer’s going to destroy a job because of the Affordable Care Act [and] now they can’t get it,” senior administration officials said in a call with reporters.
The full-time worker figure stems from the budget office’s calculation that Obamacare would reduce the total number of hours worked by 1.5 to 2.0 percent between 2017 and 2024, which is the equivalent of 2 to 2.5 million full-time workers.
The numbers changed substantially, Elmendorf said Tuesday, because the agency found new channels, like the requirement for employers to provide coverage for all full-time employees, through which the Affordable Care Act would reduce the labor supply. The CBO also drew on new evidence of how changes in tax rates and Medicaid expansions and contractions have affected the labor supply in the past.
The CBO’s estimates of the impact on the workforce are tied to how many people sign up for Obamacare under the newly created health insurance exchanges. Right now, CBO estimates that 6 million people will sign up this year. If more sign up, then the impact of the law on employment will be greater; if fewer people sign up, the effect will be smaller. As with all of the CBO’s forecasts, uncertainty abounds.
What We're Following See More »
In a speech that began a bit like a State of the Union address, President Obama said the "country is stronger and more prosperous than it was" when he took office eight years ago. He then talked of battling Hillary Clinton for the nomination in 2008, and discovering her "unbelievable work ethic," before saying that no one—"not me, not Bill"—has ever been more qualified to be president. When his first mention of Donald Trump drew boos, he quickly admonished the crowd: "Don't boo. Vote." He then added that Trump is "not really a plans guy. Not really a facts guy, either."
Tim Kaine introduced himself to the nation tonight, devoting roughly the first half of his speech to his own story (peppered with a little of his fluent Spanish) before pivoting to Hillary Clinton—and her opponent. "Hillary Clinton has a passion for children and families," he said. "Donald Trump has a passion, too: himself." His most personal line came after noting that his son Nat just deployed with his Marine battalion. "I trust Hillary Clinton with our son's life," he said.
Michael Bloomberg said he wasn't appearing to endorse any party or agenda. He was merely there to support Hillary Clinton. "I don't believe that either party has a monopoly on good ideas or strong leadership," he said, before enumerating how he disagreed with both the GOP and his audience in Philadelphia. "Too many Republicans wrongly blame immigrants for our problems, and they stand in the way of action on climate change and gun violence," he said. "Meanwhile, many Democrats wrongly blame the private sector for our problems, and they stand in the way of action on education reform and deficit reduction." Calling Donald Trump a "dangerous demagogue," he said, "I'm a New Yorker, and a know a con when I see one."
Vice President Biden tonight called President Obama "one of the finest presidents we have ever had" before launching into a passionate defense of Hillary Clinton. "Everybody knows she's smart. Everybody knows she's tough. But I know what she's passionate about," he said. "There's only one person in this race who will help you. ... It's not just who she is; it's her life story." But he paused to train some fire on her opponent "That's not Donald Trump's story," he said. "His cynicism is unbounded. ... No major party nominee in the history of this country has ever known less."
According to the most recent Gallup poll, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are equally disliked. The poll, conducted between July 18 and July 25, shows both major party candidates for president are viewed favorably by 37 percent of respondents and unfavorably by 58 percent of respondents. This poll is bad news for Clinton, who has received better favorable and unfavorable ratings in nearly every poll over the last year.